NRS 493 Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval

Grand Canyon University NRS 493 Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NRS 493 Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NRS 493 Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval                                                                  

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NRS 493 Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NRS 493 Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval                                                                

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NRS 493 Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval  is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NRS 493 Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval                                                                

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NRS 493 Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NRS 493 Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval                                                                

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NRS 493 Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval                                                                  

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NRS 493 Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NRS 493 Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval

Nursing practice and profession is founded on the intent to enhance patient outcomes and satisfaction through the delivery of quality care using evidence-based practice (EBP) interventions. Based on collaboration with the preceptor in the practicum site, one issue or problem of concern is hospital acquired pressure injuries or ulcers. Studies (Tervo-Heikkinen et al., 2021; Smith et al., 2018; 2022; Mortada et al., 2020) demonstrate that hospital acquired pressure injuries are common yet preventable conditions that impact care delivery and quality patient outcomes. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) asserts that over 2.5 million individuals develop pressure ulcers while in hospitals (Pitman et al., 2019). The purpose of this paper is to present the identified Capstone project topic for subsequent approval. The paper addresses the setting or context of the issue, describes its prevalence and effects, significance of the problem to nursing practice and provides a proposed solution.

Setting

The setting and context of the problem, hospital acquired pressure injuries or ulcers, is hospital, especially in critical and progressive care units. The critical care unit serves 20 patients who require close monitoring and changing of positions because of immobility and delicate nature of their condition. Critically ill patients often show poor tissue tolerance because of hypo-perfusion, poor nutrition and immobility as well as insufficient oxygenation of tissues. These individuals have a ten-fold higher risk for getting hospital acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs).

Description of the Issue

Despite several an array of preventive approaches, hospital acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) continue to be prevalent, particularly in critical and progressive care units. According Pitman et al. (2019), the prevalence rates of HAPIs in critical care units range from 3% to as high as 53% in comparison to 2% to 8.3% in medical-surgical units. Despite the significant variation, these injuries prevent increased cost burden and possible comorbidities that lengthens one’s stay in hospitals and other selected facilities like long-term care areas (Alderden et al., 2019). Pressure injuries range in severity, from early injuries without open wounds to advanced wounds that entail deep skin breakdown as well as bones, muscles and even tendon. As such, treating pressure injuries at different stages of their diagnosis is critical to attaining better patient outcomes.

Impact of the Hospital Acquired Pressure Injuries

As stated, HAPIs are critical quality care issues that affect millions of patients leading to deaths and increased cost of care. Organizations consider HAPI rates as a measure of the quality of nursing care offered and evaluates the financial penalties when they happen (Rivera et al., 2019). The implication is that these adverse events cause suffering and poor patient outcomes yet most of them are preventable or avoidable. As stated earlier, hospital acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs0 affect over 2.5 million patients in the U.S. and cost between $9 and $11 billion, with a further 60,000 people dying because of direct effects of having these conditions.

Significance of the Problem

HAPIs lower the quality of care and patient outcomes. Nursing practice leverages best practices, especially in preventive measures to improve patient care. As such, this issue is important for nurses to develop preventive measures and work collaboratively in the setting where it occurs (Rivera et al., 2019). Nursing practice focuses on better interventions to offer best care but having these injuries leads to increased cost of care and susceptibility to other comorbidities.

Proposed Solution

The proposed solution to reduce the prevalence of HAPI in critical care unit is having pressure injury prevention (PIP) bundle that standardizes the preventive measures. Studies show that using PIP bundle allows providers to implement a host of strategies that include patient education and even technological interventions to reduce and eliminate the incidence of HAPIs (Gaspar et al., 2019; Coyer et al., 2022). The use of PIP bundle includes having staff-focused interventions as well as patient-focused strategies that reduce the susceptibility of patients to HAPIs.

Conclusion

Hospital acquired pressure injuries are a critical concern for healthcare organizations and providers. These injuries lead to over 60,000 deaths every year in the United States and cost about $11 billion. Nursing practice is about offering quality care to patients. Therefore, implementing PIP bundle allows nurses to reduce the prevalence of HAPIs, especially in critical care units (CCUs).

References

Alderden, J., Drake, K. P., Wilson, A., Dimas, J., Cummins, M. R., & Yap, T. L. (2021).

Hospital acquired pressure injury prediction in surgical critical care patients. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01371-z

Coyer, F., Cook, J. L., Doubrovsky, A., Campbell, J., Vann, A., McNamara, G., … & Fulbrook,

152. (2022). Implementation and evaluation of multilayered pressure injury prevention strategies in an Australian intensive care unit setting. Australian Critical Care, 35(2), 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2021.03.005

Gaspar, S., Peralta, M., Marques, A., Budri, A., & Gaspar de Matos, M. (2019). Effectiveness on

hospital‐acquired pressure ulcers prevention: a systematic review. International wound journal, 16(5), 1087-1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13147

Mortada, H., Malatani, N., Awan, B. A., & Aljaaly, H. (2020). Characteristics of hospital

acquired pressure ulcer and factors affecting its development: a retrospective study. Cureus, 12(12). DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11992

Pittman, J., Beeson, T., Dillon, J., Yang, Z., & Cuddigan, J. (2019). Hospital-acquired pressure

injuries in critical and progressive care: avoidable versus unavoidable. American journal of critical care, 28(5), 338-350. DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2019264.

Rivera, J., Donohoe, E., Deady-Rooney, M., Douglas, M., & Samaniego, N. (2020).

Implementing a Pressure Injury Prevention Bundle to Decrease Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in an Adult Critical Care Unit: An Evidence-Based, Pilot Initiative. Wound Management & Prevention, 66(10), 20-28. DOI: 10.25270/wmp.2020.10.2229

Smith, S., Snyder, A., McMahon Jr, L. F., Petersen, L., & Meddings, J. (2018). Success in

hospital-acquired pressure ulcer prevention: a tale in two data sets. Health Affairs, 37(11), 1787-1796. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0712

Tervo‐Heikkinen, T. A., Heikkilä, A., Koivunen, M., Kortteisto, T. R., Peltokoski, J., Salmela,

S., … & Junttila, K. (2022). Pressure injury prevalence and incidence in acute inpatient care and related risk factors: a cross‐sectional national study. International wound journal, 19(4), 919-931. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13692