NU 631 Week 3 Discussion 1: Identifying Research Gaps by Interviewing an Expert Clinician

Regis University NU 631 Week 3 Discussion 1: Identifying Research Gaps by Interviewing an Expert Clinician– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Regis University NU 631 Week 3 Discussion 1: Identifying Research Gaps by Interviewing an Expert Clinician   assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NU 631 Week 3 Discussion 1: Identifying Research Gaps by Interviewing an Expert Clinician              

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Regis University NU 631 Week 3 Discussion 1: Identifying Research Gaps by Interviewing an Expert Clinician  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NU 631 Week 3 Discussion 1: Identifying Research Gaps by Interviewing an Expert Clinician              

The introduction for the Regis University NU 631 Week 3 Discussion 1: Identifying Research Gaps by Interviewing an Expert Clinician  is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NU 631 Week 3 Discussion 1: Identifying Research Gaps by Interviewing an Expert Clinician              

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NU 631 Week 3 Discussion 1: Identifying Research Gaps by Interviewing an Expert Clinician assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NU 631 Week 3 Discussion 1: Identifying Research Gaps by Interviewing an Expert Clinician              

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NU 631 Week 3 Discussion 1: Identifying Research Gaps by Interviewing an Expert Clinician              

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NU 631 Week 3 Discussion 1: Identifying Research Gaps by Interviewing an Expert Clinician  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NU 631 Week 3 Discussion 1: Identifying Research Gaps by Interviewing an Expert Clinician

My interviewee is a master’s prepared nurse with fourteen years of experience in psychiatric care. After going through all the information that she shared during the interview, I identified three themes that evoked my interest and curiosity and provided food for thought in terms of determining a potential evidence-based practice (EBP), quality improvement (QI), or novel research project. First, an interviewed practitioner believes that there are several gaps in mental health care that can benefit from further research. In her opinion, there is room for exploring new approaches to managing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), and substance use. When studying the literature discussing research priorities and the gaps in evidence synthesis, I learned that the topics related to treatment of substance use, TBI, PTSD, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and depression call for further research and evidence synthesis (Hempel et al., 2019).
Second, the interviewee believes that social determinants of mental health should be addressed to more effectively treat psychiatric conditions and reduce their prevalence. In this regard, I found to be interesting an article by Qin and Hsieh (2020) where the authors discuss the barriers associated with treatment gaps in mental healthcare. These barriers include stigma, high costs, inadequate resources, low treatment effectiveness, and insufficient use of technology (Qin & Hsieh, 2020). The third gap identified by the interviewee is inadequate attention to mental health promotion and prevention of psychiatric conditions. This point evoked my particular interest. Compton and Shim (2020) explain that the concepts of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention are relevant and applicable in psychiatry. Despite learning about the aforementioned gaps in research and practice, I still find it challenging to select a topic for a research proposal. I realize that the topic of interest should researchable and realistically manageable within the framework of a QI, EBP, or research project.

References

Hempel, S., Gore, K., & Belsher, B. (2019). Identifying research gaps and prioritizing
psychological health evidence synthesis needs. Medical Care, 57(10 S3), S259-S264.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001175
Compton, M.T., & Shim, R.S. (2020). Mental illness prevention and mental health promotion:
When, who, and how. Psychiatric Services, 71(9), 981-983. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201900374
Qin, X., & Hsieh, C.R. (2020). Understanding and addressing the treatment gap in mental
healthcare: Economic perspectives and evidence from China. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 57, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958020950566

Also Read

NU 631 Week 1 Discussion 2: Time to Dissect Research Studies

Sample Answer 2 for NU 631 Week 3 Discussion 1: Identifying Research Gaps by Interviewing an Expert Clinician

The information your interviewee provided about psychiatric care is a great perspective and approach to mental health. There are limited resources and services for the mental health field. Mental health is more prevalent now with more awareness but continues with a negative stigma. Many mental illnesses such as anxiety, bipolar, depression, paranoia, and eating disorders are increasing in number each year. Progressive action and treatment must continue to be implemented to decrease the number of people affected. Yes, there are many gaps in the mental health system, and as your interviewee stated, it’s essential to examine the social determinants, which are major contributing factors to mental illness. Mama, when exploring your clinical research area of interest, you should evaluate why some of these gaps exist. What are some of the top reasons why it is difficult to manage mental illnesses? Is there a correlation to funding, cost, or does it relate to limited mental health professionals, or is it related to being labeled a stressful burnout profession? One way to improve burnout and decrease staff members developing their own mental illness from work would be having organizations set up also to meet the needs of staff members offering a relief room (Chorna, V., Makhniuk, V., Pshuk, N., Gumeniuk, N., Shevchuk, Y., & Khliestova, S., 2021, p116). Taking mental health breaks within any setting can be beneficial. There are two separate entities; social determinants that lead to mental illness in individuals, then barriers limit the ability to receive care and treatment once an individual is diagnosed. I think some helpful tips that would be useful for my clinical research would be evaluating preventative measures in place or should be implemented to benefit the solution to a problem of interest. According to Breslau, J., Pritam, R., Guarasi, D., Horvitz-Lennon, M., Finnerty, M., Yu, H., & Leckman-Westin, E. (2019), “Qualitative investigations focusing on comparing successful and unsuccessful implementers of the program could provide some answers” (p. 1284). It is essential to understand what types of strategies and ideas have already been implemented regarding a research topic.

References

Breslau, J., Pritam, R., Guarasi, D., Horvitz-Lennon, M., Finnerty, M., Yu, H., & Leckman-Westin, E. (2019). Predictors of Receipt of Physical Health Services in Mental Health Clinics. Community Mental Health Journal, 55(8), 1279–1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019-00399-4

Chorna, V., Makhniuk, V., Pshuk, N., Gumeniuk, N., Shevchuk, Y., & Khliestova, S. (2021). Burnout in Mental Health Professionals and the Measures to Prevent It. Georgian Medical News, 310, 113–118.