NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion: Quality of Care
ST. Thomas University NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion: Quality of Care-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the ST. Thomas University NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion: Quality of Care assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion: Quality of Care
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the ST. Thomas University NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion: Quality of Care depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion: Quality of Care
The introduction for the ST. Thomas University NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion: Quality of Care is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion: Quality of Care
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion: Quality of Care assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion: Quality of Care
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion: Quality of Care
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion: Quality of Care assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NUR 512 Module 7 Discussion: Quality of Care
Healthcare organizations are ethically and professionally mandated to provide and sustain high-quality care. However, many variances occur at different times depending on the workload, organizational resources, and severity of patient issues, among other factors. To address such variances and sustain high performance, the Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) should collaborate with other care providers to measure and monitor care quality and the achieved outcomes. Understanding this process, tools, and systems needed is critical to standard care that addresses patient needs comprehensively.
In a typical healthcare organization, APNs and other providers rely on process, outcome, and structural measures to determine whether the delivered care meets the desired standards. According to Jazieh (2020), process measures reflect care providers’ compliance with actions implemented to achieve quality improvement goals. A suitable example is the percentage of people receiving preventive care services. The presence of such interventions demonstrates the providers’ commitment to improve and sustain health. Outcome measures are the indicators used to determine whether healthcare interventions improve patients’ health or other treatment-associated effects (Buck, 2022; Snowdon et al., 2023). For example, the rate of hospital-acquired infections is a highly reliable reflection of the impact of healthcare services for patients at a given time. Since outcomes depend on numerous factors, outcome measures guide care providers in risk adjustment and process standardization to enhance care quality. Structural measures have much to do with an organization’s capacity in terms of systems and processes. For instance, APNs can assess the nurse-to-patient ratio to determine variance in care quality and expected outcomes. A high ratio increases workload and hampers patient outcomes.
Accurate measurement and monitoring of care quality and outcomes is usually data-driven. In this case, healthcare professionals and organizational leaders should have adequate and accurate data to make informed choices. Typically, a comparative analysis of data from clinical records can help APNs determine variances and formulate interventions for higher care quality and outcomes. Data could be sourced from clinical records and is essential for outcome and collective evaluation of the effectiveness of procedures. Care experiences can also guide APNs in determining variances and opportunities for improving quality. Interactions with patients regarding communication, patient-provider interactions, and timeliness of care can help APNs determine gaps between the delivered and expected outcomes. Positive patient care experiences accurately reflect high-quality care (Wong et al., 2020). On the other hand, dissatisfaction denotes gaps that should be addressed to optimize processes and achieve better results.
Care quality measurement and monitoring should be continuous and designed to achieve safe and healthy patient care environments. Based on the gaps that emerge at different times, APNs should collaborate with colleagues and leaders to improve outcomes guided by quality improvement frameworks/models. For instance, the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach can be used to implement and evaluate healthcare interventions. Planning involves selecting and defining the components of a measure, while doing involves collecting and monitoring the measured data (Jazieh, 2020). In this study step, care providers analyze the situation and decide about the needed changes. The last step (act) involves implementing the desired changes (Chen et al., 2021). The inference is that care quality measurement is goal-driven and outcome-oriented. Hence, APNs should measure and monitor it purposefully to address performance gaps that hamper care quality.
References
Buck, J. A. (2022). The limits of using outcomes as quality measures. Psychiatric Services, 73(6), 693-694. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202000873
Chen, Y., VanderLaan, P. A., & Heher, Y. K. (2021). Using the model for improvement and plan‐do‐study‐act to effect smart change and advance quality. Cancer Cytopathology, 129(1), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.22319
Jazieh, A. R. (2020). Quality measures: Types, selection, and application in health care quality improvement projects. Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 3(4), 144–146. https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-20-X6
Snowdon, D. A., Srikanth, V., Beare, R., Marsh, L., Parker, E., Naude, K., & Andrew, N. E. (2023). A landscape assessment of the use of patient reported outcome measures in research, quality improvement and clinical care across a healthcare organisation. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09050-1
Wong, E., Mavondo, F., & Fisher, J. (2020). Patient feedback to improve quality of patient-centred care in public hospitals: a systematic review of the evidence. BMC Health Services Research, 20, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05383-3
NUR 512 Module 6 Discussion APN Business Planning STU
Strategic Planning for Advanced Practice Nurses with a Systems Thinking Perspective
With the progression of psychiatric nursing, the significance of the role of Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) in mental health care has become progressively important. The APN’s practices must stay viable and successful by engaging in strategic business planning. This case study will illustrate the process of APN business planning from a systems thinking perspective, pointing out the continuum that affects their practices. It will explain how successful business planning is approached holistically concerning the healthcare system.
Understanding Systems Thinking
Systems thinking involves seeing a situation or problem as part of a larger, more interrelated system (Li et al., 2021). In the context of APN business planning, this means recognizing the dynamic relationships and interdependencies among various components, such as organizational structures, regulatory frameworks, financial realities, and professional collaborations. By applying systems thinking, APNs can create business plans that recognize the complexity and interconnectedness of these factors.
Analyzing Organizational Structures
APNs can build successful business plans by understanding the organizational structure they practice. An understanding of administrative hierarchies, decision-making processes, and communication channels within a healthcare organization is necessary to successfully develop business plans (Joseph & Gaba, 2020). Aligning business plans with an organizational structure makes for efficient integration, effective collaboration with other healthcare professionals, and the delivery of mental healthcare services at an optimal level.
Considering Regulatory Frameworks
APN business planning requires understanding regulatory frameworks that can vary depending on the practice environment. State and federal regulations shape the scope of practice, reimbursement policies, and licensure requirements for APNs. Analyzing these regulations is necessary to ensure compliance and identify opportunities for advocacy from a systems-thinking perspective (Li et al., 2021). APNs promote legal and ethical practice in an increasingly complex healthcare environment by aligning business plans with regulatory requirements.
Financial Considerations in Business Planning
When creating an APN practice that will last, the first step lies in a firm foundation of financials. Through the lens of a systems thinker, a detailed analysis of budgeting, reimbursement models, and resource allocation is necessary (Li et al., 2021). APNs must balance delivering high-quality mental health care while staying financially viable. Partnering with someone knowledgeable in financial planning or an administrator is crucial in this phase to develop a realistic and sustainable financial model for the practice.
Professional Collaboration and Networking
The interconnectedness of healthcare systems emphasizes the significance of professional collaboration for APNs. Developing associations with healthcare professionals nurtures interdisciplinary relationships and increases the spectrum of mental healthcare services. Partnering with physicians, psychologists, social workers, and others improves referral networks and adds to enhanced client mental health outcomes. Systems thinking supports this collaboration as part of shaping a business plan that is comprehensive and effective (Ahlström et al., 2020).
Conclusion
In summary, APNS needs to approach strategic business planning from a systems thinking perspective and be aware of the complexity of the healthcare landscape. Understanding organizational structure, policies and regulations, financial accountability, and collaborations will allow APNs to develop responsive business plans. As behavioral healthcare redesign evolves, APNS must be flexible enough to adapt their strategies to align with the people served and enrich the outcomes impacting mental health.
References
Ahlström, H., Williams, A., & Vildåsen, S. S. (2020). Enhancing systems thinking in corporate sustainability through a transdisciplinary research process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120691
Joseph, J., & Gaba, V. (2020). Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: A retrospective and road map for research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 267-302. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0103
Li, Q., Zhang, L., Zhang, L., & Jha, S. (2021). Exploring multi-level motivations towards green design practices: A system dynamics approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 64, 102490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102490