NUR 550 Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design

Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NUR 550 Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design                           

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NUR 550 Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design                         

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NUR 550 Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design                         

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 550 Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 550 Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design                         

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NUR 550 Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design                           

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 550 Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NUR 550 Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design

Re: Topic 4 DQ 1

When performing research studies, especially translational research studies, it is important to conduct the study in a way that it reveals results that are both accurate to the situation being studied and that the results are consistent when applied in similar situations. Reliability and validity are used to determine if a research study and its measurement methods meet these qualifications. Validity refers to how precise the measurements are, and reliability refers to how consistent they are. (Bachelor Print, n.d.) The resilience scale (RS) that was one of the instruments used in the study performed by Schultz et al (2022) was validated in 1993 by being translated into Portuguese and found to be reliable when used in a cross-cultural resilience research study. The research study shows high construct validity because there is a strong relationship between elements such as, having high control over work environment and high social support being associated with resilience, which may lead to decreased occupational stress exposure elements and increased resilience (Schultz, et al. 2022).

References:

Bachelor Print. (n.d.). Reliability vs. Validity – Understanding the Differences.

 https://www.bachelorprint.com/methodology/reliability-vs-validity/ 

Schultz, C. C., Colet C., Rieth Benetti, E. R., Tavarse, J. P., Stumm, E. M. F., & Treviso, P. (2022). Resilience and the reduction of occupational stress in Nursing. Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem, 30. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.5866.3636

Sample Answer 2 for NUR 550 Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design

Reliability and validity are two important concepts in research design that are often used to evaluate the quality of a study. Reliability refers to the consistency of a measure or procedure. A reliable measure is one that produces consistent results over time. For example, if a researcher were to measure a person’s height using a ruler, the ruler would be considered reliable if it consistently produces the same measurement each time it is used to measure the same person’s height. Validity refers to the accuracy of a measure or procedure. A valid measure is one that accurately reflects what it is intended to measure (Rose & Johnson, 2020). For example, if a researcher were to use a questionnaire to measure a person’s happiness, the questionnaire would be considered valid if it accurately reflects the person’s happiness. It is important for researchers to consider both reliability and validity when designing a study, as both are essential for producing accurate and reliable results. A study may be reliable but not valid, or valid but not reliable. It is generally considered best practice for a research study to be both reliable and valid.

This systematic review examines the effectiveness of alarming and alerting devices in reducing falls in long-term care (LTC) facilities. The authors of the review conducted a literature search to identify relevant studies that have been published on the topic. They found that while there are many perceptions against the use of alarming devices in LTC facilities, including that they are annoying, costly, and a waste of time for staff, there is also evidence showing the benefits of these devices. Alarming devices can be a key intervention in the safety of residents who are prone to falls, but their effectiveness depends on proper implementation and education for all parties involved, as well as proper oversight of their use (Mileski et al., 2019). The review also notes that new technology is changing the perceptions of these devices, and that education is a key component for staff, residents, and families in understanding their use.

In the case mentioned, the validity of the studies included in the review would depend on the quality of the individual studies and the measures used to assess the effectiveness of alarming and alerting devices in reducing falls in LTC facilities. The study shows that when they are used effectively, they help in reducing falls. The reliability of the studies would depend on the consistency of the results they obtained and whether they would produce the same results if they were repeated. Similar studies have also show that when alarms are used effectively falls are reduced. The research is therefore reliable and valid.

References

Mileski, M., Brooks, M., Topinka, J. B., Hamilton, G., Land, C., Mitchell, T., Mosley, B., & McClay, R. (2019). Alarming and/or alerting device effectiveness in reducing falls in long-term care (LTC) facilities? A systematic review. Healthcare, 7(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7010051

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6473316/

Rose, J., & Johnson, C. W. (2020). Contextualizing reliability and validity in qualitative research: Toward more rigorous and trustworthy qualitative social science in Leisure Research. Journal of Leisure Research, 51(4), 432–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2020.1722042

Sample Answer 3 for NUR 550 Distinguish between reliability and validity in research design

Accurate and in-depth research should inform interventions to improve patients’ and the population’s health. As a result, translational research should provide reliable and valid results as it promotes knowledge transfer from basic research to clinical care. In research, validity involves the accuracy of results, while reliability is the consistency of a measure of results or data (Ahmed & Ishtiaq, 2021). In other words, validity denotes how well the data represents the true findings among participants and those not participating in a study. Reliability is achieved when similar results can be obtained consistently using the same methods under similar conditions (Phillips et al., 2021). Both factors are fundamental in research since they are used to evaluate the quality of results in terms of methods and the true relationship between different variables.

Translational research should prioritize validity and reliability to guide clinicians in achieving higher health outcomes during its implementation. Kirwan et al. (2021) explored the effectiveness of Beat It (a physical exercise and education program) in improving health outcomes among older adults with type 2 diabetes. Commonly, researchers enhance data validity and reliability by combining methodologies/tools in the data collection process. Similarly, Kirwan et al. (2021) used various data collection methods like body mass index (BMI) calculation, waist circumference measuring, and arm curls or the medicine ball throw test to measure upper body strength. Similar data was collected from all participants using the same tools and compared before and after the program. All participants were also asked to evaluate the program’s efficacy using a five-point Likert scale. Data comparison revealed significant improvements in waist circumference, balance, and aerobic capacity, indicating that the tools could measure as intended. The high validity and reliability of the results indicate accurate research that can be implemented in clinical settings and communities to improve type 2 diabetes management.

References

Ahmed, I., & Ishtiaq, S. (2021). Reliability and validity: Importance in medical research. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 71(10), 2401–2406. https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.06-861

Kirwan, M., Chiu, C. L., Hay, M., & Laing, T. (2021). Community-based exercise and lifestyle program improves health outcomes in older adults with type 2 diabetes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 6147. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116147

Phillips, S. M., Summerbell, C., Hobbs, M., Hesketh, K. R., Saxena, S., Muir, C., & Hillier-Brown, F. C. (2021). A systematic review of the validity, reliability, and feasibility of measurement tools used to assess the physical activity and sedentary behaviour of pre-school aged children. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 18(1), 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01132-9