NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison
Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison – Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison
Individuals and communities require optimal health to optimize their productivity and well-being. As care providers, change agents, and evidence-based practice (EBP) implementers, nursing professionals play a valuable role in addressing nursing practice problems. The interventions they propose are guided by translational research, which moves basic science discoveries into clinical practice (Molloy & Bearer, 2021). The purpose of this graphic organizer is to compare qualitative and quantitative translational research on a nursing practice problem.
Nursing Practice Problem:
Practice problems in nursing adversely affect the work environment, increase healthcare costs, and hamper nurses’ productivity, among other effects. The high prevalence of type 2 diabetes among older adults is a significant nursing practice problem due to its regrettable impacts, such as increased patient visits, high healthcare costs, and the high risk for cardiovascular disease (Cigolle et al., 2022; Evans et al., 2022). If not effectively controlled, the increased patient visits could threaten nurses’ health and well-being due to a high workload. According to Kirwan et al. (2021), type 2 diabetes inhibits functional performance and independence among older adults. Therefore, interventions tailored to improve functional capacity and independence and other positive outcomes are crucial for improved health and reduced clinical visits.
Qualitative Article
| Criteria | Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link Che, S., Meng, M., Jiang, Y., Ye, X., & Xie, C. (2022). Perceptions of exercise and exercise instruction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and sarcopenia: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatrics, 22(1), 892. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03519-0 |
| Methodology | The researchers conducted a qualitative study using a descriptive phenomenological approach. In phenomenological studies, researchers seek to understand an issue from the participants’ lived experiences (Alhazmi & Kaufmann, 2022). In a similar design, Che et al. (2022) conducted a series of personal semi-structured interviews among the participants to get an in-depth description of the phenomena related to how patients with type 2 diabetes and sarcopenia perceived physical exercises. |
| Goals | Physical exercises are valuable in helping older adults with type 2 diabetes increase muscle mass and strength. Therefore, the study explored how patients with type 2 diabetes and sarcopenia perceived exercise and exercise instruction from their perspective. Understanding their perceptions would help healthcare providers to understand benefits, tailor physical exercises according to patient needs, and address barriers to participation in such exercises. |
| Data Collection | Che et al. (2022) invited patients to participate in the interviews, each lasting approximately 15-35 minutes. The patients were adequately informed about the purpose, format, time to be taken, and other essentials to ensure informed consent. Data collection and analysis occurred simultaneously via an interview guide focusing on four main aspects. The first aspect was knowledge, attitudes, and everyday practices regarding exercise. Questions in this area explored the connection between physical exercises and improving blood glucose and how patients perceived and engaged in them. The second area was attitudes toward exercises, where patients answered whether they believed and accepted that exercises help treat diabetes mellitus. The third area was on practices of exercises to evaluate the type of exercises patients engage in. The second aspect was motivations, and the third aspect was barriers to exercise. The fourth aspect was attitudes toward exercise instruction. |
ALSO READ:
NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison
NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: PICOT Paper
NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project: Evaluation of Literature Table
NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review
NUR 550 Benchmark – Diverse Population Health Policy Analysis
NUR 550 Summary of Current Course Content Knowledge
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Identification of Nursing Practice Problem NUR 550
Quantitative Article
| Criteria | Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link Kirwan, M., Chiu, C. L., Hay, M., & Laing, T. (2021). Community-Based Exercise and Lifestyle Program Improves Health Outcomes in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 6147. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116147 |
| Methodology | Kirwan et al. (2021) conducted a pre-post evaluation study that compared the outcomes of a program at baseline and at eight weeks after completion. The program (Beat It) was designed to improve critical health aspects among older adults with type 2 diabetes, particularly anthropometric and physical fitness outcomes. Broadly, Beat It included twice-weekly supervised group exercises and an education program. The exercise program included aerobic, resistance, flexibility, and balance training. A total of 588 individuals participated. |
| Goals | Translational research is usually goal-driven to produce results that benefit populations and patients. In this study, researchers evaluated the efficacy of Beat It, which was largely a community-based exercise and lifestyle intervention. The results of the research would inform researchers and healthcare providers about the value of physical exercises in improving health outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes. Such knowledge would be the foundation of health promotion in healthcare organizations and communities. |
| Data Collection | Researchers collected multiple data sets to evaluate the effectiveness of the Beat It program. The first component was sociodemographic variables, such as age, gender, and residence. Height and weight were also measured to calculate body mass index (BMI) and compare values before and after the study. The values were used to categorize participants as healthy, obese, or overweight. Other data were the waist circumference. Researchers also used arm curls and medicine ball throw tests to assess participants’ strength, flexibility, and aerobic capacity. |
Conclusion
Translational research on type 2 diabetes prevention and management is extensive and applies different approaches. As revealed in the graphic organizer, researchers have explored the effectiveness of physical exercises on health outcomes such as functional capacity and independence among older adults with type 2 diabetes. Moving such scientific discoveries to clinical practice can help nursing professionals improve health outcomes among patients by implementing physical exercise programs tailored according to patient needs. Doing so could reduce clinical visits related to type 2 diabetes, improve care quality, and contribute immensely to the safety and health of the work environment.
References
Alhazmi, A. A., & Kaufmann, A. (2022). Phenomenological qualitative methods applied to the analysis of cross-cultural experience in novel educational social contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785134
Che, S., Meng, M., Jiang, Y., Ye, X., & Xie, C. (2022). Perceptions of exercise and exercise instruction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and sarcopenia: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatrics, 22(1), 892. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03519-0
Cigolle, C. T., Blaum, C. S., Lyu, C., Ha, J., Kabeto, M., & Zhong, J. (2022). Associations of age at diagnosis and duration of diabetes with morbidity and mortality among older adults. JAMA Network Open, 5(9), e2232766-e2232766. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.32766
Evans, M., Chandramouli, A. S., Faurby, M., Matthiessen, K. S., Mogensen, P. B., & Verma, S. (2022). Healthcare costs and hospitalizations in US patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: a retrospective database study (OFFSET). Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, 24(7), 1300–1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14703
Kirwan, M., Chiu, C. L., Hay, M., & Laing, T. (2021). Community-Based Exercise and Lifestyle Program Improves Health Outcomes in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 6147. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116147
Molloy, E. J., & Bearer, C. F. (2021). Translational research is all-encompassing and lets everyone be a researcher. Pediatric Research, 90(1), 2-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-01225-4
Sample Answer 2 for NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison
Nursing Practice Problem:
Infections like hospital-acquired infections (nosocomial infections) among older patients lead to poor patient outcomes and reduce quality of care. Patients suffering from hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) have longer stays in hospitals and may get disease comorbidities. In worst cases, HAIs can cause death. These infections include catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABIs) and surgical site infections. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), over 1.4 million patients get infected each year with about 98,000 patients or one in every 17 dying (Stewart et al., 2021). Old age, length of stay (LOS) in hospitals, immunosuppression, and multiple underlying comorbidities, and frequent visits to healthcare facilities are critical risk factors for HAIs. Hospitalization among older patients is important in managing acute conditions but also increases susceptibility to multiple nosocomial infections, including anti-microbial pathogens.
Hand hygiene measures and education can lower and prevent pathogens, including hospital-acquired infections among older patients in inpatient settings. Healthcare providers should advocate measures aimed at prevention and management of the HAIs to improve patient’s confidence and experience during their stay. Hand washing with soap and water and use of alcohol-based sanitizers are critical measures that nurses and other healthcare providers can implement to reduce and prevent infections. Hand hygiene measures reduce the prevalence of pathogens among all stakeholders in healthcare, including nurses and patients.
Providers implement effective evidence-based practice (EBP) interventions to address hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) by comparing different studies on hand hygiene measures. These measures focus on not only reducing but also preventing hospital acquired infections. Providers leverage evidence using different translational research studies, both qualitative and quantitative, to implement EBP interventions to reduce HAIs, especially among hospitalized older patients (Powell-Jackson et al., 2020). Through research methodologies and designs, providers can determine the effectiveness of the selected interventions to reduce and prevent infections and guarantee positive patient outcomes (Zarbin, 2020). The purpose of this translational research organizer is to compare qualitative translational article and quantitative translational article in hospital acquired infections based on various parameters that include methodologies, goals, and data collection approaches.
Qualitative Article
Criteria | Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link Knudsen, A. R., Hansen, M. B., & Møller, J. K. (2023). Individual hand hygiene improvements and effects on healthcare-associated infections: a long-term follow-up study using an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system. Journal of Hospital Infection, 135, 179-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2023.02.017
|
Methodology
| The authors employed an observational approach consisting 2 cohorts for about 2 years. The cohorts included those exposed and unexposed groups to infections and were monitored using an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system (EHHMS) to enhance compliance with hand hygiene |
Goals
| The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of two week feedback interventions provided through the electronic hand hygiene monitoring system (EHHMS) to sustain hand hygiene protocols and enhance them, improve individual responsiveness, and prevent hospital-acquired bloodstream infections. |
Data Collection
| The authors collected data using an electronic system by observing hand hygiene measures among providers or participants. The feedback came from the area with low hand hygiene compliance and followed a three-step process. |
Quantitative Article
Criteria | Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link Leistner, R., Kohlmorgen, B., Brodzinski, A., Schwab, F., Lemke, E., Zakonsky, G., & Gastmeier, P. (2023). Environmental cleaning to prevent hospital-acquired infections on non-intensive care units: a pragmatic, single-center, cluster randomized controlled, crossover trial comparing soap-based, disinfection and probiotic cleaning. EClinicalMedicine, 59. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101958
|
Methodology
| In this study, the authors used a randomized controlled trial approach in one center or setting to determine the effectiveness of environmental cleaning; including hand hygiene, to lower and prevent hospital acquired infections (HAIs). The authors conducted a pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled crossover trial involving 18 non-critical care units to determine the effects of their interventions on hospital-acquired infections. |
Goals
| The goal of the study was to determine the impacts of three diverse surface cleaning strategies, including hand hygiene to lower and reduce incidences of healthcare-associated infections. |
Data Collection
| The authors gathered data using information from patients in the different ward at a university hospital in Berlin, Germany. The study leveraged patient information at the facility to build data for in-depth analysis. |
Comparisons: Similarities and Differences
The two studies focus on interventions to reduce and prevent hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) among older patients in different settings. Both studies implement measures by translating existing evidence into practice to determine the efficacy and effectiveness of various approaches to reduce infections in inpatient settings. Similarly, both studies employ methodologies to enable them implement the various interventions at hand. The implication is that these two studies use different methods; one being observational qualitative approach and the other being randomized controlled trial based on quantitative approach.
Conversely, the studies are different as one is qualitative and the other quantitative. Knudsen et al. (2023) explore the intervention feedback for two weeks while Leistner et al., (2023) show the effects of three strategies implemented to reduce and prevent hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) in all the two studies, the researchers deploy different methods to determine the efficacy of their interventions. As such, while they implement interventions based on their setting, the different approaches demonstrate that various types of translational research that providers can use to address a clinical practice problem like infections.
Conclusion
Translational research studies deploy different methods or approaches that providers can implement to attain targeted results or patient outcomes. In this case, the two article are categorical that hospital acquire infections (HAIs) prevention strategies in any setting focus on reducing the disease burden and improving outcomes. The evidence from the articles shows that providers can implement interventions that align with their practice settings and the level of acuity of the problem.
References
Powell-Jackson, T., King, J. J., Makungu, C., Spieker, N., Woodd, S., Risha, P., & Goodman, C. (2020). Infection prevention and
control compliance in Tanzanian outpatient facilities: a cross-sectional study with implications for the control of COVID-19. The Lancet Global Health, 8(6), e780-e789. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30222-9.
Stewart, S., Robertson, C., Pan, J., Kennedy, S., Haahr, L., Manoukian, S., & Reilly, J. (2021). Impact of healthcare-associated infection on length of stay. Journal of hospital infection, 114, 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.02.026
Zarbin, M. (2020). What constitutes translational research? Implications for the scope of translational vision science and technology.
Translational vision science & technology, 9(8), 22-22. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.9.8.22