NUR 590 Compare two organizational readiness tools

Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Compare two organizational readiness tools-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Compare two organizational readiness tools assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NUR 590 Compare two organizational readiness tools                           

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Compare two organizational readiness tools depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NUR 590 Compare two organizational readiness tools                         

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Compare two organizational readiness tools is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NUR 590 Compare two organizational readiness tools                         

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 590 Compare two organizational readiness tools assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 590 Compare two organizational readiness tools                         

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NUR 590 Compare two organizational readiness tools                           

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 590 Compare two organizational readiness tools assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NUR 590 Compare two organizational readiness tools

Re: Topic 2 DQ 1

One readiness assessment an organization can you is teamSTEPPS, the organization I work at actively uses this readiness tool and I was unaware of what it truly meant until I started reading into it. Essentially teamSTEPPS assesses an organization on weather they are ready for change based upon thirteen yes or no questions using four different categories. These four categories are defined need, readiness for change in culture, time, resources, and personnel, and finally sustainability of the change. If an organization or team has more than nine questions with a yes, that organization is conducive of change. If an organization answers yes to 6-8 questions, the organization has some room for improvement and may not be conducive to change. If an organization answers yes on 1-5 questions, it is likely that the organization needs significant work to raise the readiness level of the institution (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2015).

Another readiness assessment tool is Discussion-Oriented Organizational Self-Assessment (DOSA), unlike teamSTEPPS this organizational readiness tool does not measure readiness for change as well. The DOSA is a self assessment much like teamSTEPPS, however DOSA’s self assessment revolves around capacity areas such as external relations, financial resource management, human resource management, organizational learning, service delivery and strategic management (Dearing, 2018). This self assessment although good in business practice, does not specifically look at the readiness for change which is essential in EBP implementation.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2015, August). Readiness assessment. AHRQ. https://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/readiness/index.html

Dearing J. W. (2018). Organizational Readiness Tools for Global Health Intervention: A Review. Frontiers in public health, 6, 56. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00056

Sample Answer 2 for NUR 590 Compare two organizational readiness tools

I compared the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) with the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA) to select the most appropriate tool for my organization, AdventHealth. The CFIR identifies five domains affecting implementation: outer setting, inner setting, intervention characteristics, characteristics of individuals, and implementation process. Most survey items in CFIR map to the inner setting domain, covering readiness for implementation, networks and communication, implementation climate, structural characteristics, and culture. CFIR offers a comprehensive understanding of organizational readiness, particularly in healthcare settings, by assessing various factors influencing implementation (Miake-Lye et al., 2020).

On the other hand, ORCA is a validated instrument with proven scale reliability, specifically designed to measure organizational-level readiness for effecting evidence-based changes in clinical practice. It assesses readiness among residents participating in a team-based quality improvement (QI) training curriculum, focusing on empowerment, management, QI, and QI leadership. ORCA has been successfully used in residency programs to assess and incorporate changes, making it relevant and applicable to healthcare organizations like AdventHealth (Crittendon et al., 2020).

Given AdventHealth’s focus on quality improvement and commitment to whole-person health, ORCA is the most appropriate. Its emphasis on QI leadership and management aligns well with AdventHealth’s objectives. Furthermore, its practical application in healthcare settings, particularly residency programs, demonstrates its relevance and effectiveness. ORCA’s comprehensive assessment of readiness factors, including management and leadership skills, resonates with AdventHealth’s holistic approach to care.

References

Crittendon, D. R., Cunningham, A., Payton, C., Mills, G., Kelly, S., LaNoue, M., & Arenson, C. (2020). Organizational readiness to change: Quality Improvement in Family Medicine Residency. PRiMER, 4. https://doi.org/10.22454/primer.2020.441200

Miake-Lye, I. M., Delevan, D. M., Ganz, D. A., Mittman, B. S., & Finley, E. P. (2020). Unpacking organizational readiness for change: An updated systematic review and content analysis of assessments. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4926-z

NUR-590 Topic 1 DQ 2 Sample Answer

Having a spirit of inquiry refers to people who have the drive to find to find the best evidence based practice solutions to help drive decision making (Bell, 2021).  Having members of your team that have this drive is a must in order to encourage a culture that is evidence based practice based.  As an advanced practice nurse, we normally take on a leadership role which requires for us to lead by example.  This is where it would benefit the team for us to lead with the spirit of inquiry in the interventions that we put into place.  Nurse practitioners are another example of an advanced practice nurse.  These type of advanced practice nurses have different roles than the type of nurse we are currently going to school for.  In the 2022 edition of Nursing Scope and Standards of Practice defined one of their roles as a champion for scientific inquiry (Brunt, 2023).  This ideal help them to drive their practice in the direct care of patients, which is something that we wont always encounter in the work that we do.  Regardless of the specifics of our job description, as advanced care nurses leading with evidence based practice interventions will give us the best outcomes.  

References: 

Bell, S. (2021). Step 0: The Spirit of Inquiry. Neonatal Netw. Step 0: The Spirit of Inquiry – PubMed (nih.gov)   

Brunt BA, Morris MM. (2023). Nursing Professional Development Evidence-Based Practice. Stat Pearls. Nursing Professional Development Evidence-Based Practice – StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf (nih.gov)