NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan
Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan – Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 550 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NUR 590 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan
Evidence-based practice (EBP) significantly improves patient outcomes and processes while reducing costs. Its potential to address healthcare quality and safety issues underscores its value and why nursing professionals should continually embrace practice change. Generally, EBP and quality improvement evaluation is a judicious exercise of determining whether projects and programs achieved the desired change (Schuler et al., 2021). Within nursing, the main focus areas are care quality, safety, and costs. Quantitative and qualitative data help nurses evaluate projects and determine their effectiveness. The purpose of this paper is to describe the evaluation plan of the project recommending a two-weekly physical exercise program to improve functional performance and independence among older adults with type 2 diabetes.
Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal
EBP projects are outcome-driven initiatives for improving patient care. Old age is associated with a gradual decline in physical strength and corresponding loss of functional capacity. Accordingly, the project seeks to enhance functional performance/fitness and independence among older adults with type 2 diabetes. In support of such a program, Wickramarachchi et al. (2023) underlined the significance of physical activity in preventing the loss (10%-40%) of muscle mass and joint motion among older adults. The proposed project seeks to help participants improve flexibility, muscle strength, balance, and body movement. Wickramarachchi et al. (2023) further mentioned that increasing muscular strength through physical activity helps to prevent balance disorders associated with aging and the ensuing accidental falls. Therefore, the project is critical to enhancing functional performance, independent living, and the overall quality of life in the target population.
Data Collection Tools
The nature of the proposed project necessitates a quantitative design. Bazen et al. (2021) described quantitative data as numerical, allowing researchers and evidence-based proponents to test hypotheses deductively. The most effective data collection tool for this approach is questionnaires. They will help to collect numerical data and quantify outcomes. According to O’Connor et al. (2022), questionnaires’ validity and reliability are achieved by their clear and consistent wording and enabling researchers to collect rich and large amounts of primary data from participants. Questionnaires are appropriate for the project since outcomes will be compared to baseline to determine its success.
ALSO READ:
NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final Paper
Statistical Test for the Project
The impact of an intervention should be adequately measured to justify the resources and time used in its implementation. Among many statistical tests appropriate for the project, inferential statistics is the most suitable to enable the project leader to make valid conclusions about the project’s effectiveness in addressing the clinical issue. In particular, the range (percentage differences in health changes and experiences) before and after the project will be a reliable reference. According to Sharma (2022), inferential statistics helps researchers to test hypotheses and make judicious generalizations about the survey data. A similar approach will provide accurate and quality data to deduce whether the project is clinically significant.
Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool
Using the questionnaires, participants will answer specific questions about how physical exercises improved key aspects of functional performance and independence. For an effective program, these aspects are flexibility, muscle strength, balance, and body movement (Lii et al., 2023). To calculate the range, the health statuses (greatly improved, improving, struggling, and no change) will be compared before the intervention (baseline), at four weeks, and after the intervention (eight weeks). Each health status will be rated using a Likert Scale of 1-4, and the total under each column will be converted into a percentage. A range of over 50% will indicate a successful project that should be maintained to sustain outcomes.
Strategies for Outcomes that are Nonpositive
Although EBP project leaders look forward to positive results, it is possible that the implemented change will not meet the desired outcomes. According to Lengnick-Hall et al. (2022), performance gaps may indicate poor implementation, hence the need for a comprehensive outcome evaluation. Here, questions will be asked concerning how, when, and where the recommended activities occurred. The other question area is barriers and facilitators that influenced results. For instance, some participants may be unable to cope with the intensity of the exercise program due to their health state, motivation, and lack of support. This analysis will be the basis for understanding whether the project will be redone or better outcomes can be achieved by executing some modifications. A potential modification is increasing the length of the project or the frequency of the weekly exercises (from 2 to 3 times).
Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution
The project should be maintained if it achieves the desired results. In this case, it should be continued if it improves the participants’ functional performance and independence (clinically significant results). Continuous monitoring, support, and guidance are necessary to sustain positive outcomes. It can be extended in case of positive results, but improvements in some areas could maximize outcomes. A revision is needed when outcome evaluation demonstrates issues regarding how, where, and when the project was implemented. Such a revision includes adding another physical exercise component, such as endurance training, which improves muscle strength (Markov et al., 2023). The project should be discontinued if the participants are no longer interested or have no resources to sustain it. Such an exercise can also be discontinued when the participants can do everything independently, including data collection, analysis, and decision-making.
Conclusion
EBP is crucial to improving patient outcomes. Within nursing, change leaders determine the success of EBP projects through quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods evaluation. A quantitative approach through questionnaires is the most appropriate evaluation approach for the proposed project. Positive results are expected after the eighth week. To accomplish this, participants are supposed to exercise consistently, collaborate with the project leader, and seek support as situations necessitate.
References
Bazen, A., Barg, F. K., & Takeshita, J. (2021). Research techniques made simple: an introduction to qualitative research. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 141(2), 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2020.11.029
O’Connor, S. (2022). Designing and using surveys in nursing research: a contemporary discussion. Clinical nursing research, 31(4), 567-570. https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738211064739
Lengnick-Hall, R., Gerke, D. R., Proctor, E. K., Bunger, A. C., Phillips, R. J., Martin, J. K., & Swanson, J. C. (2022). Six practical recommendations for improved implementation outcomes reporting. Implementation Science, 17(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01183-3
Markov, A., Hauser, L., & Chaabene, H. (2023). Effects of concurrent strength and endurance training on measures of physical fitness in healthy middle-aged and older adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 53(2), 437-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01764-2
Lii, Y. Y., Tai, Y. C., Wang, H. Y., Yeh, I. C., Chiu, Y. C., Hou, C. Y., & Tsai, F. H. (2023). The impact of exercise training on physical activity among elderly women in the community: a pilot study. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 11(18), 2601. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182601
Schuler, E., Mott, S., Forbes, P. W., Schmid, A., Atkinson, C., & DeGrazia, M. (2021). Evaluation of an evidence-based practice mentorship programme in a paediatric quaternary care setting. Journal of Research in Nursing, 26(1-2), 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987121991417
Sharma, S. (2022). Nursing research and statistics – e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Wickramarachchi, B., Torabi, M. R., & Perera, B. (2023). Effects of physical activity on physical fitness and functional ability in older adults. Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine, 9, 23337214231158476. https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214231158476
Evidence-based practice (EBP) projects generate varying findings about a particular intervention for a clinical problem. Ravinetto and Singh (2020) described dissemination as the targeted distribution of research information and materials to a specific public health or clinical practice audience. Since this distribution promotes large-scale implementation of the findings to maximize its benefits, particular attention to the dissemination strategies is critical. Commonly, dissemination strategies vary with the type and purpose of the research. They could be internal through report summaries to the targeted audience, using the organization’s education pages, and organization-wide presentations. A suitable strategy for organization-wide presentation is in-person meetings and communications with the organizational staff (Ashcraft et al., 2020). External dissemination includes printing in both mainstream and social media. For instance, the findings can be published in peer-reviewed journals or presented during nursing associations’ conferences (Matas, 2023). The choice of each strategy depends on effectiveness, cost, timing, and the targeted end users.
Stakeholders include individuals interested in the research findings and can maximize its benefits, which is the primary objective. For the proposed project (weekly exercise program to improve functional performance and independence among older adults), the organizational leaders and nursing colleagues are appropriate internal reviewers. They can provide informed judgment regarding the value of the project and what could be addressed before publishing it on external sites. As Ross-Hellauer et al. (2020) posited, communication with the audience should focus on passing information to facilitate research uptake and understanding. Formal and informal methods will be used interchangeably to engage the targeted audience/stakeholders. They include in-person meetings for direct interaction and feedback, emails (electronic communication) for project summaries, and phone calls to guide and engage those requiring more clarification on specific project areas.
References
Ashcraft, L. E., Quinn, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2020). Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review. Implementation Science, 15, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01046-3
Matas, J. (2023). Publication and dissemination of research results. In A Guide to Responsible Research (pp. 93-105). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Ravinetto, R., & Singh, J. A. (2023). Responsible dissemination of health and medical research: some guidance points. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 28(3), 144-147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2022-111967
Ross-Hellauer, T., Tennant, J. P., Banelytė, V., Gorogh, E., Luzi, D., Kraker, P., Pisacane, L., Ruggieri, R., Sifacaki, E., & Vignoli, M. (2020). Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research. PLoS Computational Biology, 16(4), e1007704. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.100770