NUR 590 When reviewing the literature for your evaluation plan and different types of evidence for your project, what gaps in the findings did you encounter?

Grand Canyon University NUR 590 When reviewing the literature for your evaluation plan and different types of evidence for your project, what gaps in the findings did you encounter?-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 When reviewing the literature for your evaluation plan and different types of evidence for your project, what gaps in the findings did you encounter? assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NUR 590 When reviewing the literature for your evaluation plan and different types of evidence for your project, what gaps in the findings did you encounter?                           

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 When reviewing the literature for your evaluation plan and different types of evidence for your project, what gaps in the findings did you encounter? depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NUR 590 When reviewing the literature for your evaluation plan and different types of evidence for your project, what gaps in the findings did you encounter?                         

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 When reviewing the literature for your evaluation plan and different types of evidence for your project, what gaps in the findings did you encounter? is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NUR 590 When reviewing the literature for your evaluation plan and different types of evidence for your project, what gaps in the findings did you encounter?                         

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 590 When reviewing the literature for your evaluation plan and different types of evidence for your project, what gaps in the findings did you encounter? assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 590 When reviewing the literature for your evaluation plan and different types of evidence for your project, what gaps in the findings did you encounter?                         

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NUR 590 When reviewing the literature for your evaluation plan and different types of evidence for your project, what gaps in the findings did you encounter?                           

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 590 When reviewing the literature for your evaluation plan and different types of evidence for your project, what gaps in the findings did you encounter? assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NUR 590 When reviewing the literature for your evaluation plan and different types of evidence for your project, what gaps in the findings did you encounter? 

Re: Topic 6 DQ 1

Southern New Hampshire University defines a research gap as “a question or a problem that has not been answered by any of the existing studies or research within your field. A research gap can exist when there is a concept or new idea that hasn’t been studied at all. Sometimes you’ll find a research gap if all the existing research is outdated and in need of new/updated research. Or, perhaps a specific population has not been well studied” (2023). While performing the literature review for my project on decreasing CKD prevalence through education and awareness, I found both quantitative and qualitative articles that support my theory but there were some gaps in research also.   Based on my analysis of the literature, I found that there are gaps in the areas of specific interventions tailored to increasing disease awareness and health promotion in the African American community. Further research is needed on the factors associated with poorer health-related quality of life in the African American CKD population. Identifying and prioritizing research gaps is an essential part of any research and helps researchers understand areas of uncertainty within the research problem (Dhanya, 2022).

Dhanya, A. (2022). How to Identify Gaps in Research: Tips to Speed Up the Process. https://researcher.life/blog/article/identify-gaps-in-research-tips/

Southern New Hampshire University. (2023). What is a Research Gap and How do I Find One? https://libanswers.snhu.edu/faq/264001

Sample Answer 2 for NUR 590 When reviewing the literature for your evaluation plan and different types of evidence for your project, what gaps in the findings did you encounter? 

There are several gaps identified while reviewing literature that could affect my project and future research. My project’s topic is about nurse telephone post hospital discharge follow-ups to reduce early unplanned readmissions among older adult patients. One of the gaps is inconsistent outcomes as some researchers established that phone follow-up is associated with reduced readmissions while others did not find significant impact of this intervention (Chang et al., 2023; Loon‐van Gaalen et al., 2021).  This shows the need of standardized and more rigorous methodologies across studies on telephone follow-ups.  Another issue is lack of standardized follow-up protocols in terms of calls content, timing, and frequency. For instance, there are studies that involved immediate follow-up calls post-discharge (hours to few days) and others that spaced calls for a relatively longer period (more than a week) (Chang et al., 2023; Loon‐van Gaalen et al., 2021). These differences in protocols makes it challenge to establish the most effective follow-up strategy. Moreover, there are several confounding factors that can influence early unplanned readmissions among older patients; these include age (some are much older), comorbidities, support systems, type of health condition, season (e.g., flu season), polypharmacy, and socioeconomic status (Glans et al., 2020). Therefore, future research must consider these factors for better understanding to whom are the telephone follow-ups most beneficial.  In summary, future research should find standardized protocols, employ tailored approaches for different patient categories, and perform cos -effectiveness analysis of the intervention to provide rationale for allocating resources for the initiative.

References

Chang, P. C., Li, Y. C., Chen, H. J., Huang, H. C., Chen, W., Kuo, Y. C., & Fan, S. Y. (2023). Effectiveness of Using Telephone Follow-Up Intervention on the Unplanned Readmission of Older Adult Patients within 14 Days of Being Discharged from Hospital. International Journal of Gerontology, 17(4). Available at https://doi.org/10.6890/IJGE.202310_17(4).0003

Glans, M., Kragh Ekstam, A., Jakobsson, U., Bondesson, Å., & Midlöv, P. (2020). Risk factors for hospital readmission in older adults within 30 days of discharge – a comparative retrospective study. BMC Geriatrics, 20(1).  Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01867-3

Loon‐van Gaalen, M., Linden, M. C., Gussekloo, J., & Mast, R. C. (2021). Telephone follow‐up to reduce unplanned hospital returns for older emergency department patients: A randomized trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 69(11), 3157–3166. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17336

Sample Answer 3 for NUR 590 When reviewing the literature for your evaluation plan and different types of evidence for your project, what gaps in the findings did you encounter? 

Literature evaluation is an essential aspect of the Evidence-Based Project (EBP) as it sheds light on the topic with findings from current research. When analyzing the literature associated with my EBP, a few gaps were identified. Most studies were carried out using smaller samples that may not guarantee the true reflection of the entire population. Some studies were carried out strictly in rural or urban settings which may have children with different characteristics or learning abilities. While other studies considered eliminating children with parents who worked in healthcare settings that could influence their understanding on the importance hand hygiene (HH) some of them did not eliminate them hence an inaccurate reflection of the effect of HH education among elementary school children. Researchers need to be cognizant of the fact that a small sample size may not give a true reflection of the research findings therefore, there is need to have an adequate sample size. More et al. (2022) recommended the need to carry out the study on a larger sample to get a generalized view on the population. In addition to this, researchers need to purposefully select their sample bearing in mind the variables that may affect the reliability of the study findings such as level of education or knowledge. Klar et al. (2022) recommended that research involving children should be increased. I gathered that ensuring research that focuses on elementary school children should be a driving factor to the researchers. Finally, the location of the study must be considered bearing in mind how it affects the overall outcome of the study.

References

Klar, K., Knaack, D., Kampmeier, S., Hein, A. K., Goerlich, D., Steltenkamp, S., Weyland, U., & Becker, K. (2022). Knowledge about hand hygiene and related infectious disease awareness among primary school children in Germany. CHILDREN-BASEL, 9(2). https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.3390/children9020190

More, M. V., Ingale, S. A., Pawar, A. A., & Potdar, N. J. (2022). Hand hygiene practices among school children in selected schools, at karad, Taluka. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 13, 1555–1562. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S01.185

Sample Answer 4 for NUR 590 When reviewing the literature for your evaluation plan and different types of evidence for your project, what gaps in the findings did you encounter? 

A literature review is a critical component of research as it allows a researcher to obtain the current evidence regarding the issue of focus and, at the same time, identify gaps that can then form the basis of future research (Hickman et al.,2018). In nursing research, such gaps are key to formulating new research approaches and processes, which can then be used to improve patient outcomes related to the identified clinical issue. During the literature review for the evaluation plan and different types of evidence for the project, various gaps were encountered worth mentioning and exploring.

One of the gaps found in the literature is the lack of a sufficient number of studies where the use of automated fall detectors led to a statistically significant improvement in the rates of falls. From the literature reviewed, it was noted that even though studies showed the clinical significance of the use of automated fall detectors in preventing patient falls, most of such results are not statistically significant (Tanwar et al.,2022). Such an observation has a substantial influence on other researchers. For example, when the findings are not statistically significant, using such an intervention as a guideline, evidence-based practice, or a gold standard for that particular issue is difficult.

The other gap that was identified was the non-homogeneity of the study designs used. The study designs applied in the use of automated fall detectors largely varied from study to study. For instance, different studies focused on a varied number of participants which makes it difficult to draw comparisons (Singh et al.,2020). The designs used were also largely varied, ranging from experimental to non-experimental studies, which also pauses a challenge when drawing comparisons.  As such, the gap can influence researchers to come up with guidelines that can be used to promote homogeneity of research in a particular issue to help arrive at comparable and more valid findings.

References

Hickman, L. D., DiGiacomo, M., Phillips, J., Rao, A., Newton, P. J., Jackson, D., & Ferguson, C. (2018). Improving evidence-based practice in postgraduate nursing programs: A systematic review: Bridging the evidence-practice gap (BRIDGE project). Nurse Education Today, 63, 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.015

Singh, A., Rehman, S. U., Yongchareon, S., & Chong, P. H. J. (2020). Sensor technologies for fall detection systems: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 20(13), 6889-6919. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.2976554

Tanwar, R., Nandal, N., Zamani, M., & Manaf, A. A. (2022, January). Pathway of trends and technologies in fall detection: a systematic review. In Healthcare (Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 172). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010172