NUR 630 Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data

Grand Canyon University NUR 630 Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data – Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University  NUR 630 Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NUR 630 Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data                           

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University  NUR 630 Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NUR 630 Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data                           

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University  NUR 630 Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data  is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NUR 630 Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data                           

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 630 Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 630 Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data                           

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NUR 630 Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data                           

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 630 Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NUR 630 Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data

Presentation’s Outline

Regardless of size, resources, and other factors, health care facilities should consistently pursue high performance. Quality measures guide hospitals in evaluating performance and determining the scope and type of interventions required to enhance performance. The purpose of this presentation is to examine data related to hospital-acquired infection rates at ABC Health. Understanding this data and its implications is crucial for stakeholders to collaborate and define the desired goal for improvement. The main presentation areas include conclusions drawn for each measure, trends, and comparisons with the national benchmark. Other areas include an outline of priority quality measures, quality improvement metric, monitoring strategies, and using data for quality improvement.

Conclusions for SSIs from Colon Surgery (SSI: Colon)

In the current practice, surgical site infections (SSIs) continue to threaten patient safety and care quality. According to McFarland et al. (2023), SSIs are the second-most occurring hospital-associated infections after urinary tract infections. As displayed in this graph, SSI: colon rates rose sharply from 2012 to 2013 before increasing steadily from 2013 to 2015. Generally, there is a threatening increase in infection rates, posing a significant risk to patients undergoing colon surgery at ABC Health. Hou et al. (2020) reported that a single incidence of SSIs after surgery can double the danger of postoperative mortality. Therefore, multimodal interventions to prevent the rising infection rates for SSI colon are crucial in the facility.

Conclusions for CLABSI

Organizational leaders should know all issues hampering care quality and increasing facility management costs. Awareness of the rates of CLABSI can help them design effective control measures and reduce costs. As shown in the graph, CLABSI rates at ABC Health during the five years are somewhat within the same range (2.234, 2.089, 3.128, 3.063, and 3.422). Despite this performance, the goal should always be providing care without an incidence of HAI. This data could imply that the present interventions for controlling CLABSI are ineffective. Therefore, a change is necessary, but intervention designers and implementers should be effectively guided by data, scientific evidence, and priorities.

Conclusions for CAUTI

Hospitals should be safe sites for patients and care providers. A reliable way of achieving this goal is to implement measures to prevent HAIs as much as possible. CAUTI infection rates data for ABC Health is encouraging since it shows a consistent decline over the five years. Such a decline implies increased patient safety, more satisfaction, and other outcomes of reduced infection rates. Musco et al. (2022) suggested that most facilities rely on care bundles to prevent CAUTI, consisting of multiple interventions to address various clinical indicators. From the data on CAUTI at ABC Health, it can be deduced that measures used to prevent CAUTI from 2011 to 2015 were effective.

Conclusions for SSI: Hysterectomy

A facility recording high rates of surgical site infections from abdominal hysterectomy (SSI: Hysterectomy) should be worried about its procedures and the standard of the care environment. As the graph demonstrates, SSIs from abdominal hysterectomies at ABC Health increased steadily from 2011-2015 (1.148, 2.132, 2.094, 3.697, 4.608). Although there was an insignificant decline during the 2012-2013 period, overall data demonstrates a high-risk area since there has been no considerable decline over the years. Shigematsu et al. (2022) associated high infection rates after abdominal hysterectomy with prolonged operative time (lasting over 3 hours), excess blood loss, and the general condition of the patient. Therefore, examining these risk factors could help ABC Health to prevent further increases in the rates due to the resultant harm.

Trends Over the 5-Year Period

Hospitals should use quality measures to guide performance improvement. As the data shows, the rates for SSI colon have steadily increased in the past three years. CLABSI rates also reveal some increment in the same period, which is different for CAUTI, whose rates have declined. However, there is no data to allow a comprehensive analysis of CAUTI. SSI: hysterectomy rates are also on a gradual increment in the last three years. From these trends, it is obvious that risk factors that increase HAIs at ABC Health were high from 2013 to 2015. If not effectively controlled, there is a likelihood of recording similar or worse data after 2015.

Comparison with the National Benchmark: SSI Colon

Hospitals should always weigh their performance internally and externally. Willmington et al. (2022) underlined the importance of national benchmarks since they allow care facilities to identify their strengths and weaknesses at all system levels. Compared to the national benchmark, ABC Health did well from 2011 to 2013 since the infection rates were lower or equal to the national benchmark. Unfortunately, that was not the case in 2014 and 2015 since the rates were higher than the national benchmark, indicating a poorer performance than other facilities. As a result, intensified control measures are crucial in this area and others where infection rates exceed the national benchmark.

Comparison with the National Benchmark: CLABSI

CLABSI infection rates at ABC Health provide interesting figures compared to the national benchmarks. In 2011 and 2012, the hospital rates were worse than the national benchmark. In 2013, the rates were slightly better than the national benchmark before recording same figures in 2014 and 2015. On average, the rates are within the same range as the national benchmark, underscoring the need for intensified efforts to achieve a significant decline. Beville et al. (2021) advised health care professionals to consider reducing central line day by removing nonessential catheters, increasing multidisciplinary rounds, and other appropriate interventions. Similar measures are needed for the hospital rates to be lower than the national benchmark.

Comparison with the National Benchmark: CAUTI

CAUTIs increase health care costs and hospitalizations if not effectively controlled in care facilities. Compared to the national benchmark, CAUTI rates at ABC Health are better than the national benchmark over time. The reason being, the measure exceeded the national benchmark only in 2011 before equaling it in 2012 and recording a significant reduction in 2014 and 2015. Undeniably, a performance better than the national benchmark depends on the interventions a care facility uses to control infections. For CAUTI, the care bundle is widely used in many hospitals and has positive outcomes (Gupta et al., 2023). Therefore, ABC Health should continue with its CAUTI management strategies and integrate others that can lower the rates significantly.

Comparison with the National Benchmark: SSI Hysterectomy

Data provide an accurate reflection of hospital performance for stakeholders. On average, it can be deduced that ABC Health’s performance for SSI: hysterectomy is worse than the national benchmark over the years. This is because it only performed better than the national benchmark in 2011 before equaling it in 2012 and 2013. Next, the hospital’s performance declined in 2014 and 2015, indicating an increased risk for patients. Pangan et al. (2022) underlined the need for care facilities to implement the hysterectomy bundle to prevent SSIs from abdominal hysterectomy. Its essential components are chlorhexidine bathing and incisional skin preparation in the intraoperative phase and patient education in the post-operative phase.

Priority Quality Measures

Health care facilities prioritize intervention areas based on the severity of an issue, resources available, and evidence-based practice (EBP). After examining the data, priority quality measures should be SSI: colon and SSI: hysterectomy. As discussed in their respective sections, the rates for these measures have been increasing over time during the reference period. Besides, their average performance is worse than the national benchmark, indicating the need for rapid and sustainable interventions to control the current risk and mitigate future threats. Importantly, SSIs are critical outcome measures since they are effects of poor processes, such as long surgical hours, inadequate post-procedure hygiene, and poor orientation of nurses (Shigematsu et al., 2022; Tesfaye et al., 2022). Addressing them is crucial for higher outcomes in this facility.

Quality Improvement Metric and Related Measures

High patient outcomes are achieved through a concerted effort to address performance gaps. As Krishnappa et al. (2022) stated, health care professionals should work towards achieving specific goals within a particular timeline while using appropriate models. Doing so ensures effective utilization of health resources and performance tracking to facilitate adjustments as situations necessitate. Reducing SSI: hysterectomy is an appropriate quality improvement metric since it is specific, measurable, and time-bound. Apart from patient education, higher performance can be achieved by an incessant desire to promoting a safety culture, hand hygiene practices, and skin infection before and after procedures. Continuous vigilance of at-risk patients can also help ABC Health to respond to issues proactively.

Monitoring the Metric

Evidence-based interventions to address performance gaps are resource- and time-intensive. Therefore, implementers should monitor performance appropriately and modify the process as situations prompt. A patient education program for reducing SSI: hysterectomy can be effectively monitored progressively and at the end of the process. Progressive monitoring tools include checklists assessing whether everything progresses as planned. Patients can also be interviewed about their experiences with the intervention to evaluate its feasibility. Summative evaluation can provide reliable quantitative data about the effectiveness of the intervention. A suitable approach is a comparative analysis of the SSI: hysterectomy rates before and after patient education to determine whether the expected rate reduction was attained.

Using Data for Quality Improvement

Quality improvement is a continuous process focused on achieving better outcomes for patients, care providers, and health care facilities. According to Shah (2019), data helps nursing staff and leaders gain deeper insight into an issue and understand its meaning. Similarly, data from progressive and summative evaluations of the intervention can be useful in assessing its feasibility and identifying improvement areas. Data would also be helpful in evaluating the scope of future quality improvement programs, such as patient education and hand hygiene projects. Since some issues require multidimensional interventions, data is also essential in analyzing whether a single intervention or different programs are needed to address quality issues in the facility.

Summary

Quality improvement should be prioritized in health care facilities to optimize patient outcomes. The quality measures for ABC Health focus on HAIs, which significantly affect patient safety, care quality, and patient satisfaction. As graphically analyzed in the various sections, there is a threatening increase in rates for most measures except CAUTI. Therefore, ABC Health should prioritize some areas for immediate interventions. SSI: colon and SSI: hysterectomy should be the priority measures due to the increment in rates over the five years. The quality improvement metric (QIM) can be subjected to both progressive and summative monitoring to provide data for addressing performance gaps related to HAIs and other measures.

References

™Beville, A. S. M., Heipel, D., Vanhoozer, G., & Bailey, P. (2021). Reducing central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) by reducing central line days. Current Infectious Disease Reports, 23(12), 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-021-00767-w

™Gupta, P., Thomas, M., Mathews, L., Zacharia, N., Ibrahim, A. F., Garcia, M. L., … & El Hassan, M. (2023). Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections in the cardiac intensive care unit with a coordinated strategy and nursing staff empowerment. BMJ Open Quality, 12(2), e002214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002214

™Hou, T. Y., Gan, H. Q., Zhou, J. F., Gong, Y. J., Li, L. Y., Zhang, X. Q., … & Zhang, Y. (2020). Incidence of and risk factors for surgical site infection after colorectal surgery: a multiple-center prospective study of 3,663 consecutive patients in China. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 96, 676-681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.124

™Krishnappa, V., George, E., Oravec, M., Jones, R., Lee, A., & Sweet, D. (2022). Quality improvement project to improve providers’ goal-setting activity for chronic disease self-management. Journal of Healthcare Quality Research, 37(2), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhqr.2021.10.003

™McFarland, A., Manoukian, S., Mason, H., & Reilly, J. (2023). Impact of surgical-site infection on health utility values: a meta-analysis. British Journal of Surgery, znad144. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad144

™Musco, S., Giammò, A., Savoca, F., Gemma, L., Geretto, P., Soligo, M., Sacco, E., Del Popolo, G., & Li Marzi, V. (2022). How to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a reappraisal of Vico’s theory-is history repeating itself?. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(12), 3415. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123415

™Pangan, A., Castellano-Flynn, P., & Bowman, D. (2020). Creation of a hysterectomy bundle to reduce surgical site infections: a Standardized Approach. American Journal of Infection Control, 48(8), S42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.043

™Shah, A. (2019). Using data for improvement. BMJ, 364. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l189

™Shigematsu, K., Samejima, K., Kizaki, Y., Matsunaga, S., Nagai, T., & Takai, Y. (2022). Factors associated with surgical-site infection after total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery, 5(4), 131-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lers.2022.09.001

™Tesfaye, T., Dheresa, M., Worku, T., Dechasa, D. B., Asfaw, H., & Bune, A. J. (2022). Surgical site infection prevention practice and associated factors among nurses working at public hospitals of the western part of southern nation, nationalities, and peoples’ region, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Surgery, 9, 1013726. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1013726

™Willmington, C., Belardi, P., Murante, A. M., & Vainieri, M. (2022). The contribution of benchmarking to quality improvement in healthcare. A systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07467-8

Sample Answer 2 for NUR 630 Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data

Instituting a just culture within a healthcare organization requires management action on multiple fronts. These fronts include integrating just culture principles into daily work practices and processes, building awareness, and implementing policies supporting a just culture. The two elements of a just culture I regard most difficult to achieve are patient safety and human behavior. 

Building awareness is critical in ensuring the staff members understand the entire concept of a just culture related to human behavior. A strategy that will make this achievable is surveying managers, staff, medical leaders, and administrators through various questions that seek to determine their thoughts about the organization’s response to a particular behavior by a clinician if it led to harm (Marx, 2019). For instance, such behavior could be a medication error or bringing unauthorized equipment into the surgical room for utilization in surgery. The survey results will indicate how people consider being judged when their behavioral choice harms (Marx, 2019). Raising awareness should accompany it through educational sessions for all staff to better understand a just culture along with its practical and helpful principles and tools that they can use.  The staff will also learn to classify behavioral choices as at-risk behavior, error, or reckless behavior. 

Once every organizational member has grasped the concept of a just culture and the leadership buys into it, the organization can incorporate it into daily work. Hence, a strategy to achieve the patient safety element of a just culture is through integration of just culture into organizational processes and practices (Bates & Singh, 2018). The leadership should not introduce a just culture as a new initiative but look at the challenges faced and apply just culture principles to that situation. For instance, if its priority is to reduce the harm associated with patient misidentification that results in errors, the organization should focus on how it would work with its staff to understand and classify behavioral choices as reckless, at-risk, or error, along with organization response to such behavior (Bates & Singh, 2018). Thus, the healthcare organization can incorporate just culture into its performance improvement initiatives such as patient identification, hand washing, and other safety measures.

References

Bates, D. W., & Singh, H. (2018). Two Decades Since to Err is Human: An Assessment of Progress and Emerging Priorities in Patient Safety. Health Affairs, 37(11), 1736–1743. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0738 

Marx, D. (2019). Patient Safety and the Just Culture. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 46(2), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2019.01.003

Sample Answer 3 for NUR 630 Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data

Introduction

To guarantee that Medicare recipients get high-quality treatment, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implements quality measurements in programs such as quality improvement, pay for reporting, and public reporting (Kim et al., 2020). These measurements assess the procedures, results, patient perceptions, and organizational structures associated with providing effective, safe, efficient, patient-centered, equitable, and timely care. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) incorporates these measurements into its improvement, public reporting, and pay-for-reporting initiatives. The purpose of this presentation is to conduct an analysis of healthcare data about hospital-associated infections and to establish the presenting techniques that are most successful for concerned parties. The presentation also includes data on hospital quality measures from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) over five years, focusing on four quality metrics at the site, detecting patterns, and offering information that may be put into action.

Background

The National Nosocomial Infections Monitoring System was established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 1970, which was a critical turning point in the history of the monitoring and reporting of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in the United States. Since the 1960s, there has been a substantial advancement in the development of HAIs in the United States. Following the publication of the Institute of Medicine study in 1999 that highlighted HAIs as avoidable harms, legislative regulations for public HAI reporting came into existence. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) started implementing payment changes in 2005, and in 2010, they included HAI prevention as part of the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. Both of these events further highlighted the significance of proper HAI reporting. Electronic surveillance techniques gradually replace traditional manual surveillance methods, increasing efficiency and reliability. Furthermore, developments in data interoperability can enhance digital quality measurements and patient safety metrics in the future.

Overview

Surgical Site Infections (SSI) from colon surgery and abdominal hysterectomy, Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI), and Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI) are the four key hospital quality measures that are highlighted in the data that was collected by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for ABC Health over a period of five years. The findings indicate that there is a wide range of performance in comparison to the national standards. The scores for CAUTI are consistently lower than the benchmarks, which suggests improved performance in infection management. On the other hand, SSI from colon surgery and CLABSI exhibited scores that exceeded benchmarks over some periods, indicating regions of concern (Kim et al., 2020). The results suggest that the hospital’s performance in quality metrics could be more consistent, which calls for continuous review and attempts to improve the situation.

Conclusion: SSI: Colon

The performance of ABC Health on the Surgical Site Infection from colon surgery (SSI: Colon) metric has shown a tendency that is cause for worry throughout the last five years. 2011 saw the beginning of the national standard, which began at 2.234 and varied until it reached 2.548 by 2015. On the other hand, the ratings awarded to ABC Health have not considerably improved over the years, with the highest score ever recorded being 3.555 in 2015, which is much higher than the national standard. This suggests that there is a continuing problem with surgical site infections in colon procedures, and it also indicates that more treatments are required to improve patient outcomes in this area (Weiner-Lastinger et al., 2019).

Conclusion: CLABSI

Conversely, the Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) metric has remained stable for ABC Health, with scores roughly matching the national standard. The standard was 2.234 in 2011 and stabilized at 3.422 in 2015, while ABC Health’s scores varied, although consistently hovered around the benchmark, with a score of 3.063 in 2014. This indicates that ABC Health has consistently controlled CLABSI, reflecting excellent infection control measures (Serra-Burriel et al., 2020).

Conclusion: CAUTI

The Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI) metric indicates a favorable trend for ABC Health. The national standard started at 1.879 in 2011 and decreased to 1.231 by 2015. ABC Health’s scores have persistently fallen below the national threshold, with a peak score of 0.466 in 2015. This indicates that ABC Health has effectively executed methods to lower CAUTI rates, reflecting a dedication to enhancing patient safety and treatment quality in this domain (Maurer et al., 2020).

Trends

ABC Health demonstrated fluctuating patterns throughout the five years in four quality metrics. The score for Surgical Site Infection after colon surgery (SSI: Colon) increased from 0.174 in 2012 to 2.487 in 2014, reflecting a favorable trend although remaining over the national standard of 2.548. Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) scores varied, commencing at 2.845 in 2011 and stabilizing at 3.063 in 2014, aligning with the national standard. Catheter-associated urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI) showed a notable reduction from 2.814 in 2011 to 0.567 in 2014, much below the national standard of 1.089. The Surgical Site Infection rate after abdominal hysterectomy (SSI: Hysterectomy) increased from 1.148 in 2011 to 3.697 in 2014, above the national standard of 2.512. ABC Health has significantly improved in decreasing infection rates, especially CAUTI (Sheetz & Ryan, 2019).

Comparisons

During the five years, ABC Health’s performance regarding Surgical Site Infection (SSI) from colon surgery (HAI_3_SIR) reveals a troubling tendency compared to the national standard. In 2015, the hospital’s score of 3.555 was significantly above the national standard of 2.548, indicating a greater prevalence of infections than the norm. This pattern aligns with prior years, during which the hospital’s scores were above the norm, shown by 2014’s score of 2.487 compared to a benchmark of 2.319. The data indicates that ABC Health needs to comply with national criteria for this specific quality metric, raising concerns over surgical techniques and infection control methods (Gardner et al., 2023).

Conversely, ABC Health’s performance concerning Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI) (HAI_2_SIR) has significantly surpassed expectations, maintaining scores constantly under the national average. 2015, the hospital scored 0.466, much lower than the national norm of 1.231. The pattern of decreasing scores persisted in prior years, shown by 2014 when the score was 0.567 compared to a standard of 1.089. The consistent performance demonstrates that ABC Health has successfully implemented steps to diminish the occurrence of CAUTIs, reflecting a robust dedication to patient safety and infection control in this domain (Sheetz & Ryan, 2019).

The Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) metric (HAI_1_SIR) indicates a varied performance for ABC Health. In 2015, the hospital’s score aligned with the national norm of 3.422, indicating satisfactory performance. Upon reviewing prior years, the results have varied, recording a score of 3.063 in 2014 against the same criterion. This discrepancy suggests that while ABC Health has achieved the criterion in some years, there remains potential for improvement to guarantee that the hospital regularly meets or surpasses national criteria. The Surgical Site Infection rate from abdominal hysterectomy (SSI: Hysterectomy) (HAI_4_SIR) exhibits fluctuation, with scores fluctuating from 1.148 in 2011 to 3.697 in 2014, underscoring the need for continuous assessment and improvement of surgical protocols to reduce infection rates. ABC Health’s performance on various quality indicators reveals numerous strengths and shortcomings, necessitating focused initiatives to enhance patient outcomes (Hsu et al., 2020).

Prioritization

When assessing the quality metrics at ABC Health, emphasis should be placed on Surgical Site Infections (SSI) resulting from colon surgery and Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI). The SSI following colon surgery is 3.555, markedly above the national standard of 2.548, indicating a crucial area for improvement. Likewise, CLABSI scores 3.422, aligning with the national norm; yet, it necessitates scrutiny owing to its possible implications for patient safety. Conversely, Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI) and Surgical Site Infections (SSI) after abdominal hysterectomy have lower ratings than their benchmarks, indicating a reduced level of urgency. Improving scores in SSI and CLABSI may result in better patient outcomes, decreased infection rates, and increased overall hospital quality metrics, establishing them as priority indicators for ABC Health (Reeves et al., 2019).

Quality Improvement Metric

The suggested measure seeks to enhance treatment procedures, results, and patient experiences in colon surgery. The emphasis is on minimizing SSIs and CLABSIs via standardized surgical practices and perioperative care. Essential measures include compliance with preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, surgical hand cleanliness, and adherence to central line insertion protocols. Outcome measures include SSI rates per 100 colon operations, readmission rates, CLABSI rates per 1,000 central line days, and the duration of hospital stay linked to CLABSI. Balancing measures include surveilling undesired outcomes such as heightened antibiotic resistance or patient distress (Hsu et al., 2020). A comprehensive data-gathering system is implemented, accompanied by regular audits and feedback sessions. Interventions include routine training for healthcare personnel on infection prevention methods, standardization of procedures, and patient involvement. The measure will be assessed for precision and employee involvement.

Monitoring

To efficiently oversee the metrics of Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) and Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs), a multidisciplinary team must be formed to analyze data and provide constructive comments to clinical teams routinely. Using dashboards and visual aids will enable the presentation of real-time infection rates, promoting openness and accountability (Reeves et al., 2019). Consistent meetings will foster a safety culture and ongoing improvement, allowing candid talks about obstacles and achievements. Furthermore, regular assessments of intervention efficacy will provide essential modifications to methods while acknowledging achievements and disseminating best practices within the organization, which will sustain momentum in infection reduction.

Summary

Evaluating ABC Health’s performance over five years presents a nuanced perspective on hospital quality metrics, especially regarding infection rates. Surgical Site Infections (SSI) after colon surgery continue to be a substantial issue, with rates continuously above national standards, highlighting the need for enhanced surgical protocols. In contrast, the hospital has shown proficient care of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI), continuously attaining lower rates than the national standard. Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) results have varied but aligned with the national baseline 2015, indicating consistent performance. Enhancing patient outcomes and overall hospital quality necessitates prioritizing improvements in SSI and CLABSI and implementing standardized procedures and monitoring systems.

References

• Gardner, C., Rubinfeld, I., Gupta, A. H., & Johnson, J. L. (2023). Inter-hospital transfer is an independent risk factor for Hospital-Associated infection. Surgical Infections, 25(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2023.077
• Hamadi, H., Borkar, S. R., Moody, L., Tafili, A., Wilkes, J. S., Franco, P. M., McCaughey, D., & Spaulding, A. (2020). Hospital-Acquired Conditions Reduction Program, patient safety, and magnet designation in the United States. Journal of Patient Safety, 17(8), e1814–e1820. https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000000628
• Hsu, H. E., Wang, R., Broadwell, C., Horan, K., Jin, R., Rhee, C., & Lee, G. M. (2020). Association between Federal Value-Based Incentive Programs and Health Care–Associated infection rates in Safety-Net and Non–Safety-Net hospitals. JAMA Network Open, 3(7), e209700. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9700
• Kim, K. M., Max, W., White, J. S., Chapman, S. A., & Muench, U. (2020). Do penalty-based pay-for-performance programs improve surgical care more effectively than other payment strategies? A systematic review. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 60, 623–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.060
• Maurer, N. R., Hogan, T. H., & Walker, D. M. (2020). Hospital- and System-Wide Interventions for Health Care-Associated Infections: A Systematic Review. Medical Care Research and Review, 78(6), 643–659. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558720952921
• Nelson, R. E., Hatfield, K. M., Wolford, H., Samore, M. H., Scott, R. D., Reddy, S. C., Olubajo, B., Paul, P., Jernigan, J. A., & Baggs, J. (2020). National estimates of healthcare costs associated with Multidrug-Resistant bacterial infections among hospitalized patients in the United States. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 72(Supplement_1), S17–S26. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1581
• Reeves, A. B. G., Lewis, J. W., Trogdon, J. G., Stearns, S. C., Weber, D. J., & Weinberger, M. (2019). Association between statewide adoption of the CDC’s Core Elements of Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia rates and Clostridioides difficile infection in the United States. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 41(4), 430–437. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2019.352
• Serra-Burriel, M., Keys, M., Campillo-Artero, C., Agodi, A., Barchitta, M., Gikas, A., Palos, C., & López-Casasnovas, G. (2020). Impact of multi-drug resistant bacteria on economic and clinical outcomes of healthcare-associated infections in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 15(1), e0227139. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227139
• Sheetz, K. H., & Ryan, A. (2019). Accuracy of quality measurement for the Hospital Acquired Conditions Reduction Program. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29(7), 605–607. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009747
• Weiner-Lastinger, L. M., Abner, S., Edwards, J. R., Kallen, A. J., Karlsson, M., Magill, S. S., Pollock, D., See, I., Soe, M. M., Walters, M. S., & Dudeck, M. A. (2019). Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with adult healthcare-associated infections: Summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2015–2017. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 41(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2019.296