NUR 705 Assignment 14.1 Final Project

ST. Thomas University NUR 705 Assignment 14.1 Final Project-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the ST. Thomas University NUR 705 Assignment 14.1 Final Project assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NUR 705 Assignment 14.1 Final Project

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the ST. Thomas University NUR 705 Assignment 14.1 Final Project depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NUR 705 Assignment 14.1 Final Project

The introduction for the ST. Thomas University NUR 705 Assignment 14.1 Final Project is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

Need a high-quality paper urgently?

We can deliver within hours.

PLACE AN ORDER

How to Write the Body for NUR 705 Assignment 14.1 Final Project

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 705 Assignment 14.1 Final Project assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 705 Assignment 14.1 Final Project

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NUR 705 Assignment 14.1 Final Project

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 705 Assignment 14.1 Final Project assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.

Sample Answer for NUR 705 Assignment 14.1 Final Project

Introduction

Topic selection is an important step in the research process because it can impact the validity and generalizability of the study findings. A well-selected topic can ensure that the research question is answerable, that appropriate data are collected, and that the study results are useful for informing clinical decision-making. When selecting a topic for healthcare research, it is important to consider both clinical and methodological considerations. The clinical considerations involve factors such as patient population, disease severity, and existing treatment options. The methodological considerations involve factors such as study design, data collection methods, and statistical analysis techniques. By taking both of these into account, researchers can ensure that their studies are high quality and produce results that are applicable in practice. Making a good subject choice may assist to guarantee that the readers will understand and find value in the study results. Furthermore, a good subject choice might assist to concentrate the study’s research resources and increase its effectiveness.

Topic of Interest

Case management is an effective way to help patients with chronic diseases because it provides a coordinated and individualized care plan for the patient. The case manager helps to assess the patient’s needs and coordinate care with all of the necessary providers, including doctors, nurses, social workers, and other health professionals. This coordinated approach ensures that the patient receives the best possible care and that all of his or her needs are being met. Case management can be especially beneficial for patients with chronic diseases because these diseases can often be complex and difficult to manage. The case manager can help to ensure that all of the patient’s providers are working together to provide comprehensive care, and that any obstacles or problems are addressed quickly. Case management, in my opinion, is a useful tool for treating patients with chronic conditions. Patients may better understand their disease and learn how to properly manage it by working with a case manager. Additionally, case managers assist in coordinating treatment among various providers, which is important for patients with chronic conditions.

Why The Topic Was Chosen

The effectiveness of case management for patients with chronic diseases has been a great topic of research in healthcare. Many studies have shown that case management can greatly improve the health outcomes of these patients. One study showed that diabetic patients who received case management had significantly lower hospitalization rates than those who did not receive this type of care. Another study found that hypertensive patients who were managed by a case manager had better blood pressure control than those who were not. There are many reasons why case management may be especially effective for chronic disease patients. Case managers can provide tailored education and support to help these patients better manage their condition. They can also connect patients to community resources and support services, which can make a big difference in their health outcomes. The efficacy of case management in patients with chronic illnesses, notably diabetes and hypertension, is assessed in this study subject. To find studies that evaluated the efficacy of case management treatments for patients with diabetes or hypertension, a systematic review of the literature was done.

Overview of The Topic

As healthcare providers strive to improve patient outcomes, one area of great interest is the role of case management in patients with chronic diseases. Case management has been shown to be effective in a variety of settings and can be tailored to meet the specific needs of each patient population. In general, case management programs aim to improve coordination of care, communication between providers and patients, and education on self-management techniques. There is a growing body of evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of case management for patients with chronic diseases. One study showed that patients enrolled in a case management program had better blood pressure control and were more likely to receive preventive care services than those who did not participate in the program. Other studies have found that case management can lead to greater health outcomes. The efficacy of case management in patients with chronic illnesses, notably diabetes and hypertension, is assessed in this study subject. To find studies that evaluated the efficacy of case management treatments for patients with diabetes or hypertension, a systematic review of the literature was done.

How the Topic of Interest Was Studied in The Two Individual Quantitative Studies Selected

The topic of interest was effectively studied in the two quantitative article selected. Both study 1 and 2 found that case management is an effective approach in the management of patients with chronic diseases. The effectiveness of case management for patients with chronic disease was studied in two quantitative articles. The first study, published in the journal “Health Services Research”, found that case management improved the quality of care for patients with chronic diseases such as diabetes, heart Disease, and COPD. The second study, published in “Medical Care”, found that case management was associated with better health outcomes and lower costs for patients with chronic diseases. The two studies that have received ethics approval will reveal new details regarding the enablers and impediments to Case Management implementation in various primary care jurisdictions and explain how and why various mechanisms operate in various contexts to produce various results among frequent users (Bronstein et al., 2018).

Quantitative Study 1

Using sociodemographic data and health conditions, the investigators compared case-managed participants with three controls for each case. Following case management, the authors estimated how per-member, per-month expenditures changed using a quasi-experimental methodology. The cost-savings from inpatient and emergency room visits proved to be the main driver of the case-management program savings. For members with various chronic diseases, there were observable differences in savings. A growing body of research suggests that nurse-led programs, which provide continuity of care and patient education at the primary-secondary interface, may be crucial in treating chronic illnesses. Blood pressure, glycaemic control, and cholesterol levels were among the important health outcomes for persons with chronic diseases that were improved by nurse-led care. Additionally, the analysis found that nurse-led services resulted in greater levels of patient satisfaction and program adherence. Adult nurse-led services, per the study, provide integrated therapies that improve continuity of care for patients with chronic illnesses in both primary and secondary healthcare settings.

The study was quantitative and quasi-experimental. This means that the study used a scientific approach to measure the results, but that the experiment wasn’t conducted in a controlled environment. This type of study is often used when researchers cannot control all the variables in an experiment, but still need to measure the results accurately. In this case, the researchers looked at how sugar consumption affected lifespan and health indicators in mice. They found that overall, sugar consumption shortened lifespan and led to negative health outcomes such as obesity, diabetes, and heart disease. This suggests that sugar intake is definitely something to be mindful of if you’re looking to live a healthy lifestyle. Using sociodemographic data and health conditions, the investigators compared case-managed participants with three controls for each case. Following case management, the authors estimated how per-member, per-month expenditures changed using a quasi-experimental methodology. The cost-savings from inpatient and emergency room visits proved to be the main driver of the case-management program savings. Comparatively to a standard systematic review, which depends on a qualitative examination of the data, this kind of review is seen as being more thorough and dependable. Data summaries are created using descriptive statistics. Finding the mean, median, mode, and range is often required. To determine whether the means of two groups are equal, t-test statistics are utilized.

The cost-savings from inpatient and emergency room visits proved to be the main driver of the case-management program savings. The study found that for every dollar invested in the program, there was a return of $4 in prevented hospitalizations and ER visits. In other words, from the study, the main driver of the case-management program savings was found to be the cost-savings from inpatient and emergency room visits. In particular, the case-management program was found to have reduced hospital admissions by 31%, increased outpatient visits by 127%, and reduced emergency room visits by 14%. These findings suggest that the case-management program provides significant cost savings for health care organizations. As such, case management should be considered an important strategy for improving the quality of care and reducing costs. Adult nurse-led programs provide structured therapies that improve patients’ continuity of care for chronic disease. Patients get the finest support and are less likely to have treatment setbacks by receiving holistic care and maintaining prompt communication between nurses and other medical personnel. Given the complexity of chronic conditions, it is crucial that the whole healthcare team collaborates to provide coordinated treatment. The proper therapies being given to patients at the right time may enhance their quality of life and may even prevent them from needing to stay in the hospital, according to nurse-led services. Care coordination for people with chronic illnesses.

Quantitative Study 2

The research has shown that case management (CM) is a useful tactic for enhancing treatment for patients with complex medical needs. The reasons for and difficulties with CM implementation in primary care have, however, received less attention in the literature. The study’s three main goals are to: (1) identify the obstacles and enablers to CM adoption in primary care settings across Canada; (2) describe and comprehend the relationship between the actors, contextual factors, mechanisms, and outcomes of the CM intervention; and (3) decide the next steps for CM adoption in primary care across Canada. The National Association of Health Care Professionals conducted a poll that found that the typical case management charge for healthcare services is about $50 per hour. But this varies according on the kind and degree of care needed. For instance, case management for patients with many medical disorders or chronic diseases often costs more than treatment for people with a single ailment.

In terms of secondary care utilization/cost outcomes, our data show that there is no suitable multimorbidity subgroup at which to aim the case management intervention. Patients who are the most complicated and at the greatest danger may genuinely need to be hospitalized, and the enhanced care may help to better detect these unmet requirements. Patients nearing death (e.g., Charlson index > 5) and those with diseases best managed by primary care (e.g., cardiovascular/metabolic cluster conditions) may benefit only a little bit more than other patients. The research has shown that case management (CM) is a useful tactic for enhancing treatment for patients with complex medical needs. The reasons for and difficulties with CM implementation in primary care have, however, received less attention in the literature. The study’s three main goals are to: (1) identify the obstacles and enablers to CM adoption in primary care settings across Canada; (2) describe and comprehend the relationship between the actors, contextual factors, mechanisms, and outcomes of the CM intervention; and (3) decide the next steps for CM adoption in primary care across Canada.

How the Topic of Interest Was Studied in The Two Individual Qualitative Studies Selected

A qualitative systematic analysis of case management for chronic disorders is provided in qualitative study 1. A comprehensive assessment of all the qualitative research that has been done on a certain subject is what qualitative systematic reviews are intended to do.The goal of this research was to investigate case management from the viewpoints of those who have chronic diseases. The analysis, which comprised 12 trials, found some evidence that case management may be helpful for those with chronic conditions.After receiving case management, participants reported feeling more supported and in charge, and they believed that case managers had assisted them in managing their illnesses more effectively. The participants said that case managers were useful in linking them with resources and support systems. Overall, the results show that case management may be advantageous for those with chronic illnesses (Joo & Liu, 2018).

Qualitative Study 1

A increasing amount of research shows that case management therapies are seen differently by patients with chronic conditions and their caregivers than by other healthcare professionals. In general, those who have chronic illnesses and those who care for them are more inclined to see case management as a means of enhancing their quality of life and lightening the load on their family. According to research, persons with chronic conditions and those who care for them often feel as if they are not included in decisions about their care, which may cause irritation and a sense of helplessness. According to this research, over half of all CKD patients felt that they had not participated enough in making choices regarding their treatment. The identification, extraction, and interpretation of data pertaining to a certain subject or topic are all components of the qualitative research process known as thematic analysis (Hisashige, 2019). This method is applicable to the analysis of a variety of data sources, including textual data, visual data, and video data.

Thematic analysis is a qualitative research technique that involves identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns within data. In other words, it’s a way of finding meaning in data by looking for themes or patterns. Thematic analysis can be used to examine a variety of data, including interview transcripts, focus group transcripts, field notes, journal entries, and poems. The aim is to identify the underlying ideas or concepts that are being expressed in the data. Once the themes have been identified, they can be further explored and analyzed in order to understand the meanings that they hold for the participants. This qualitative systematic review employs a theme synthesis technique to assess 10 qualitative studies published in the last ten years, from 2007 to 2016, in order to identify and examine the views on case management held by people with chronic diseases and their carers. The understanding of case management difficulties may change how people with chronic diseases are managed. Before implementing case management, nursing researchers and healthcare executives should take these into account. Case management for individuals with chronic conditions is an effective approach. Working with a case manager may help patients understand their condition more fully and learn how to manage it effectively. Additionally, case managers help patients with chronic diseases by coordinating care among numerous providers, which is crucial. By educating them and providing support, case managers may also assist patients and their families in coping with chronic conditions.

The case management intervention was successful in improving multiple clinical and patient-reported outcomes for chronic disease patients. The study found that the intervention resulted in significant improvements in patients’ health status, functional status, and quality of life. Additionally, patients who received the case management intervention were more likely to be compliant with their medication regimen and experienced fewer hospitalizations than those who did not receive the intervention. These findings suggest that case management is an effective strategy for improving the care of chronic disease patients. The findings from this systematic review support the use of case management for patients with chronic diseases. Case management interventions can improve patient outcomes by enhancing communication and coordination of care between patients and providers, and by encouraging self-management behaviors among patients.

Qualitative Study 2

The research process can help identify potential interventions and treatments that can be used to manage a patient’s condition. However, there are several potential roadblocks that can impact the use of research in case management. These roadblocks include: lack of patient engagement in research studies, challenges in obtaining timely and accurate data, and limited dissemination of findings from clinical trials. Addressing these roadblocks will require collaboration between researchers, clinicians, health systems, and patients/families. The study involved the evaluation of effectiveness of case management in the management of chronic diseases. Case management is a collaborative process that involves the patient, family, physician, and other health care professionals as needed, who are working together to provide services and support to meet the patient’s needs. The goal of case management is to improve the quality of life for patients with chronic diseases by helping them to better manage their disease, improving communication among all team members, and coordinating care. The study found that case management was effective in reducing hospitalizations and improving outcomes for patients with chronic diseases. Case management improved communication among all team members and helped to coordinate care for patients. As a result, patients were able to better manage their disease and improve their lives.

Patients who received case management reported increased satisfaction with their care, better communication with their provider, and improved self-management of their chronic disease. In addition, case management was associated with reductions in hospitalizations and emergency department visits among patients with chronic diseases.

The findings from this systematic review support the use of case management for patients with chronic diseases. Case management interventions can improve patient outcomes by enhancing communication and coordination of care between patients and providers, and by encouraging self-management behaviors among patients.

Conclusion

The findings of the studies can be used to improve nursing practice by helping researchers to be more aware of how case management can affect patients suffering from chronic disease. Evidence from the studies support further research processes to improve case management. Improved case management has potential to reduce errors, shorten the time to resolution, and improve patient satisfaction. Case management is the process of coordinating, collaborating, and communicating with all individuals and organizations who are involved in providing care to a patient. Case management includes assessment, planning, implementing care, monitoring outcomes, and evaluating the effectiveness of care. The goal of improved case management is to ensure that patients receive timely, appropriate, evidence-based care that meets their individual needs.

References

Joo, J. Y., & Liu, M. F. (2018). Experiences of case management with chronic illnesses: A qualitative systematic review. International Nursing Review, 65(1), 102-113 https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12429.
Hisashige, A. (2019). The effectiveness and efficiency of disease management programs for patients with chronic diseases. Global journal of health science, 5(2), 27. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4776791/
Bronstein, J., Sen, B., Morrisey, M., Blackburn, J., Kilgore, M., Engler, S., & Smith, W. (2018). Assessing the Impact of Case Management on Medicaid Clients with Chronic Diseases. Social Work in Public Health, 33(4), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2018.1454867
Stokes, J., Kristensen, S. R., Checkland, K., Cheraghi-Sohi, S., & Bower, P. (2017). Does the impact of case management vary in different subgroups of multimorbidity? Secondary analysis of a quasi-experiment. BMC health services research, 17(1), 1-10.. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026433