NUR 705 Assignment 3.1 Levels of Measurement in Article

ST. Thomas University NUR 705 Assignment 3.1 Levels of Measurement in ArticleStep-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the ST. Thomas University NUR 705 Discussion 3.1 Random Sampling  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NUR 705 Discussion 3.1 Random Sampling                                                                            

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the ST. Thomas University NUR 705 Discussion 3.1 Random Sampling  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NUR 705 Discussion 3.1 Random Sampling                                                                          

The introduction for the ST. Thomas University NUR 705 Discussion 3.1 Random Sampling  is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NUR 705 Discussion 3.1 Random Sampling                                                                          

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 705 Discussion 3.1 Random Sampling  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 705 Discussion 3.1 Random Sampling                                                                          

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NUR 705 Discussion 3.1 Random Sampling                                                                            

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 705 Discussion 3.1 Random Sampling  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.

Sample Answer for NUR 705 Assignment 3.1 Levels of Measurement in Article

A dependent variable is a variable whose value depends on the value of one or more other variables (the independent variables). In other words, the dependent variable is a function of the independent variables (Diel et al., 2021). For example, in the study, levels of depression, fatigue, aerobic endurance, muscular strength, and quality of life (QOL) among patients with cancer (the dependent variable) depended on the level of participation in a 12-session exercise program (independent variable).

From the study, A 12-session cancer rehabilitation exercise program was found to result in significant improvements in self-reported physical and psychological functioning, including vitality, fatigue, anxiety, and depression. The study also showed a decrease in IL-6, TNF-α, and CRP levels (indicators of inflammation) (Smith & Broomhall, 2016). The results of this study suggest that a 12-session cancer rehabilitation exercise program is an effective intervention for improving the self-reported physical and psychological functioning of cancer patients. It is important to note that the results of this study are correlational; therefore, it cannot be determined whether the improvements in self-reported physical and psychological functioning were due to the exercise program or some other factor.

From the study, the independent variable is the level of participation in a 12-session exercise program while the dependent variables include levels of depression, fatigue, aerobic endurance, muscular strength, and quality of life (QOL) among patients with cancer. The level of measurement is a way of classifying data according to the type of information they represent. There are three levels of measurement: nominal, ordinal, and interval/ratio. From the above case, the dependent variable is ordinal while the independent variable is nominal. For the independent variable, the measurement was done during a 6- to 10-week exercise program that occurred twice weekly (Smith & Broomhall, 2016). In particular, the six-minute walk test was conducted using the track in the exercise room; each lap was 90 feet. For the dependent variable, aerobic endurance was measured with the six-minute walk test (Smith & Broomhall, 2016). On the other hand, Muscular strength was measured with the hand grip strength test and muscular endurance with the 30-second sit-and-stand test while depression was measured using PHQ-9 scale.

In conclusion, from the study, the independent variable had significant impacts on the dependent variables. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that participating in a 12-session exercise program will improve depression, fatigue, aerobic endurance, muscular strength, and quality of life (QOL) in patients with cancer.

References

Diel, A., Weigelt, S., & MacDorman, K. F. (2021). A Meta-analysis of the Uncanny Valley’s Independent and Dependent Variables. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 11(1), 1-33. https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3470742

Smith, T. M., & Broomhall, C. N. (2016). Physical and psychological effects of a 12-session cancer rehabilitation exercise program. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 20(6), 653. https://www.proquest.com/openview/4ba25367b3aa0162c1519e88b4606985/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=33118