NUR 705 Assignment 6.1 Quantitative Article Critique 1 Part I

ST. Thomas University NUR 705 Assignment 6.1 Quantitative Article Critique 1 Part I-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the ST. Thomas University   NUR 705 Assignment 6.1 Quantitative Article Critique 1 Part I  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for   NUR 705 Assignment 6.1 Quantitative Article Critique 1 Part I                                                                            

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the ST. Thomas University   NUR 705 Assignment 6.1 Quantitative Article Critique 1 Part I  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for   NUR 705 Assignment 6.1 Quantitative Article Critique 1 Part I                                                                          

The introduction for the ST. Thomas University   NUR 705 Assignment 6.1 Quantitative Article Critique 1 Part I  is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for   NUR 705 Assignment 6.1 Quantitative Article Critique 1 Part I                                                                          

After the introduction, move into the main part of the   NUR 705 Assignment 6.1 Quantitative Article Critique 1 Part I  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for   NUR 705 Assignment 6.1 Quantitative Article Critique 1 Part I                                                                          

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for   NUR 705 Assignment 6.1 Quantitative Article Critique 1 Part I                                                                            

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the   NUR 705 Assignment 6.1 Quantitative Article Critique 1 Part I  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NUR 705 Assignment 6.1 Quantitative Article Critique 1 Part I

The DNP project topic under consideration is “effectiveness of case management for patients with chronic diseases.” Some of the diseases in this case include conditions lasting more than one year and require continuous medical attention (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2022). They include diabetes, cancer, and heart disease and significantly limit the patient’s ability to manage activities of daily living. The quantitative article that relates to the DNP topic is:

Davis, K. M., Eckert, M. C., Hutchinson, A., Harmon, J., Sharplin, G., Shakib, S., & Caughey, G. E. (2021). Effectiveness of nurse–led services for people with chronic disease in achieving an outcome of continuity of care at the primary-secondary healthcare interface: A quantitative systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 121, 103986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103986

A Summary of How the Article Relates to Your Potential DNP Project Topic

According to the article, there is evidence that nurse-led services can improve the continuity of care for people with chronic disease, especially at the primary-secondary healthcare interface. A study in the United Kingdom found that patients who saw the same nurse over time had better continuity of care and communication, and improved health outcomes. Another study found that nurses who provided more coordinated care had lower hospitalization rates and improved patient satisfaction. There are a number of factors that contribute to the effectiveness of nurse-led services for people with chronic disease. Firstly, nursing staff need to have access to comprehensive information about their patients’ medical histories in order to provide appropriate care. Secondly, there needs to be good communication between all members of the healthcare team.

The article relates to the DNP project, first, it identifies or determine the effectiveness of nurse-led services for individual with chronic diseases in achieving the outcome of continuity of care at both the primary and secondary healthcare interface. Secondly, the approaches and the objectives of this quantitative article align with the topic’s objectives. Finally, the article focuses on the effectiveness of case management for patients with chronic diseases, this provides elaborate and comprehensive information that can be applied in the DNP project.

The Search Terms and the filters Used

Some of the search terms applied in search of the article include: effectiveness of case management for patients, chronic diseases, effectiveness in the management of chronic diseases, patient managements, and the management of chronic disease. The methodological search filters were used to accurately determine the article, some of the methodological filters used include type of the article, quantitative, the study type, and the topic for research.

The Method Used in Reviewing Search Results

The process of reviewing search results is an important step in ensuring accuracy and completeness. When reviewing search results, it is important to consider various factors such as date, source, relevance, and quality. -Date: The date of the result is an important factor to consider when reviewing accuracy. A result that is outdated may no longer be accurate. For example, a search for “restaurants near me” may bring up different results if the search is conducted on a different day. -Source: The source of the result also affects its accuracy. A result from a credible source is more likely to be accurate than one from an unknown or untrustworthy source.

Reference

CDC. (2022). About chronic diseases. https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/about/index.htm#:~:text=Chronic%20diseases%20are%20defined%20broadly,disability%20in%20the%20United%20States.