NURS 6512 DIGITAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: FOCUSED EXAM: COUGH

Walden University NURS 6512 DIGITAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: FOCUSED EXAM: COUGH– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 6512 DIGITAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: FOCUSED EXAM: COUGH assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS 6512 DIGITAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: FOCUSED EXAM: COUGH

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 6512 DIGITAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: FOCUSED EXAM: COUGH depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS 6512 DIGITAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: FOCUSED EXAM: COUGH

The introduction for the Walden University NURS 6512 DIGITAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: FOCUSED EXAM: COUGH is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NURS 6512 DIGITAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: FOCUSED EXAM: COUGH

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 6512 DIGITAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: FOCUSED EXAM: COUGH assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 6512 DIGITAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: FOCUSED EXAM: COUGH

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NURS 6512 DIGITAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: FOCUSED EXAM: COUGH

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 6512 DIGITAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: FOCUSED EXAM: COUGH assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NURS 6512 DIGITAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: FOCUSED EXAM: COUGH

SUBJECTIVE DATA:  

Chief Complaint (CC): “I have been coughing a lot.” 

History of Present Illness (HPI):  

Danny Rivera is an 8-year-old Puerto Rican boy that presented to the Shadowville Elementary nurse’s office with complaints of cough. He provides subjective data about his health problem. He is responsive and answers appropriately the questions asked during the assessment. Danny reports that he has been coughing a lot for the last three days. The cough is wet, productive, leading to slimy clear phlegm. The cough worsens at night affecting his sleep, as he reports he did not get enough sleep the previous night. The cough lasts a few seconds.  

Danny resides in the same house with his grandfather who is a smoker, exposing him to cigar smoke. Danny reports that her mother gave her a table spoonsful of a purple-ish medicine, which soothed his cough. He has no history of using any home remedies for cough. He recently took syrup prescribed by his doctor for cough. He takes multivitamins daily. Danny is usually physically active. However, the cough has reduced his ability to engage in active physical activity, as he feels fatigued. The cough has also affected his ability to concentrate in class since he does not get enough sleep at night. Danny also reported worsening running nose ever since the cough started. The patient reports sore throat but denies sneezing.   

Medications: Danny reports that his mother gave him a purple-ish medicine to sooth his cough this morning. He is not on any other medication. 

Allergies: Danny does not have any history of food, drug, or environmental allergic reactions. 

Past Medical History (PMH): Danny has a history of pneumonia. He also has a frequent experience of cold, since his rose is runny most of the times. 

Past Surgical History (PSH):Danny has no history of surgeries 

Sexual/Reproductive History: Danny is an 8-year-old boy with unremarkable sexual or reproductive history.  

Personal/Social History: Danny resides with his mother and grandfather. He is a student. He likes engaging in active physical activity. His grandfather smokes cigarette, exposing him to harmful smoke at home. 

Immunization History: Danny’s immunization history is up-to date.  

Significant Family History (Include history of parents, Grandparents, siblings, and children): There is a history of asthma (his grandfather).  

Review of Systems:  

General: The patient is alert, responsive, and answers asked questions appropriately. He reports fatigue and denies fevers and chills.  

HEENT: Danny denies headache, vision changes, dizziness, watery eyes, eye redness, eye pain, and sinus pain. The patient reports sore throat, running nose, and itchy nose at times.  

Respiratory: The client denies difficulty in breathing. He reports wet productive cough. He also reports occasional sneezing 

OBJECTIVE DATA:  

Physical Exam: 

Vital signs: Not given  

General: The patient is alert and oriented to self, place time. He is well groomed for the occasion.  

HEENT: The sclera is white with most and pink conjunctiva with no discharge. The nasal cavities are pink with clear discharge. The turbinate is patent. The ears have no abnormal visible findings with cone of light being 7.00, no discharge, and tympanic membranes being pearly grey. The oral mucosa appears moist and pink with erythematous tonsils. The posterior oropharynx appears pink with cobble stoning in the posterior oropharynx texture. There is no postnasal drip. 

Respiratory: The breath sounds are present in all the areas with absent adventitious sounds. The lung sounds are clear with fremitus symmetrical bilaterally. Lung function tests: : FEV1: 1.549 L, FVC 1.78 L (FEV1/FVC: 87%) 

Cardiology: Auscultation of the bronchoscopy negative with no extra sounds. There is resonance on chest wall percussion with no dullness. 

Lymphatics: No lymphadenopathy 

Diagnostics/Labs: The additional laboratory and diagnostic investigations needed to develop diagnoses include nasal culture and chest x-ray should the patient demonstrate worsening symptoms. The chest x-ray may be needed to rule out other causes such as tuberculosis and pneumonia if the symptoms worsen. 

ASSESSMENT: 

Danny’s priority diagnosis is common cold. Common cold is a term used to refer to mild upper respiratory illness. The disease has viral origin. It is self-limiting disease that mainly affects the upper respiratory tract. In severe cases, patients may develop spread of the viral infection to other organs and complications such as those caused by the bacteria. Patients affected by common cold present the hospital with complaints that include sneezing, nasal discharge and stuffiness, sore throat, cough, and fatigue. The additional symptoms that patients may exhibit include hoarseness, headache, lethargy, and myalgia. The symptoms often last between 1 and 7 days with them peaking within 2-3 days of the infection (Ibrahim et al., 2021; Montesinos-Guevara et al., 2022; Wilson & Wilson, 2021). Danny has present with symptoms that align with those of common cold. For example, he complains of cough, sore throat, and running nose for the last three days, hence, common cold being his primary diagnosis.  

Danny’s secondary diagnosis is rhinosinusitis. Rhinosinusitis is a disorder characterized by the inflammation of the nasal cavities and passages. Patients develop this condition following their exposure to potential causes such as smoke, lowered immunity, and asthma. Patients often report symptoms such as nasal congestion, toothache, loss of smell, halitosis, postnasal drip, and runny nose (Chandy et al., 2019; Utkurovna et al., 2022). Danny is frequently exposed to tobacco smoke, which may have led to the development of rhinosinusitis. However, the absence of additional symptoms such as postnasal drip, toothache, loss of smell, and sinus pain or pressure, makes rhinosinusitis the least likely cause of his problem.  

The last differential diagnosis that should be considered for the patient is whooping cough or pertussis. Pertussis is a disorder of the upper respiratory system that is characterized by severe hacking cough accompanied by whooping breath sounds. The disease is highly contagious and requires immediate patient isolation to prevent its spread in the population. The symptoms associated with whooping cough include cough, fever, red, watery eyes, nasal congestion, and runny nose. The affected populations are increasingly predisposed to complications such as pneumonia, seizures, brain damage, and dehydration (Zhang et al., 2020). However, pertussis is Danny’s least likely diagnosis because of the lack of hacking, whooping cough and red, watery eyes. 

Also Read:

LAB ASSIGNMENT: ASSESSING THE ABDOMEN

DIGITAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: ASSESSING THE HEART, LUNGS, AND PERIPHERAL VASCULAR SYSTEM

ASSESSING MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN

CASE STUDY ASSIGNMENT: ASSESSING NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS

DIGITAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: COMPREHENSIVE (HEAD-TO-TOE) PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT

LAB ASSIGNMENT: ASSESSING THE GENITALIA AND RECTUM

References 

Chandy, Z., Ference, E., & Lee, J. T. (2019). Clinical Guidelines on Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Children. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, 19(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-019-0845-7 

Ibrahim, A. E., Elmaaty, A. A., & El-Sayed, H. M. (2021). Determination of six drugs used for treatment of common cold by micellar liquid chromatography. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 413(20), 5051–5065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-021-03469-3 

Montesinos-Guevara, C., Buitrago-Garcia, D., Felix, M. L., Guerra, C. V., Hidalgo, R., Martinez-Zapata, M. J., & Simancas-Racines, D. (2022). Vaccines for the common cold. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 12. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002190.pub6 

Utkurovna, S. G., Farkhodovna, S. Z., &Furkatjonovna, B. P. (2022). OPTIMIZATION OF THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE RHINOSINUSITIS IN CHILDREN. Web of Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal, 3(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GYBM7 

Wilson, M., & Wilson, P. J. K. (2021). The Common Cold. In M. Wilson & P. J. K. Wilson (Eds.), Close Encounters of the Microbial Kind: Everything You Need to Know About Common Infections (pp. 159–173). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56978-5_10 

Zhang, J.-S., Wang, H.-M., Yao, K.-H., Liu, Y., Lei, Y.-L., Deng, J.-K., & Yang, Y.-H. (2020). Clinical characteristics, molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of pertussis among children in southern China. World Journal of Pediatrics, 16(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-019-00308-5 

Sample Answer 2 for NURS 6512 DIGITAL CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: FOCUSED EXAM: COUGH

SUBJECTIVE DATA:

 Chief Complaint (CC): “I guess I’m kind of sick. . . I’ve been coughing a lot’

History of Present Illness (HPI): The affected person A young boy named Danny Riviera, who is only 8 years old, visits the medical center because he has been coughing for the past few days. According to what he says, the cough is very clear and has a watery quality to it. His cough is worse at night, which prevents him from getting adequate rest. As a consequence of this, he has trouble concentrating in class and often comes home exhausted. It’s painful in his right ear. The decision his mother made to use over-the-counter cough medicine, which only provided temporary relief, was made. Danny claims that he has a cold and that he suffers from a runny nose on a regular basis. Additionally, he inhales his father’s secondhand smoke on a regular basis. Within the past year, he has also been diagnosed with pneumonia. However, he does not have a fever, difficulty breathing, abdominal pain, chest tightness, or chills. He also does not have chest tightness.

Medications: The patient acknowledges that they do take their medications at home. In addition to that, he takes a vitamin every day. In addition to that, he takes a medication for coughing that is purple.

Allergies: NKDA

Past Medical History (PMH): Denies asthma diagnosis. Identifies immunizations as being up to date. Previous symptoms include chronic coughing and pneumonia.

Past Surgical History (PSH): None reported.

Sexual/Reproductive History:

Personal/Social History: Identifies himself as a member of a household that also includes his parents and grandparents. avers having a sense of well-being while at home. Describes a park with a playground in the neighborhood. It is reported that the father smokes in the house.

Immunization History: Immunizations are current.

Significant Family History: He is supported by his biological parents as well as both sets of grandparents.

Review of Systems:

General: During the course of the interview, the patient appears exhausted and coughs several times. Additionally, he seems to be steady.

HEENT: The mucus membrane is wet, and the discharge from the nose is clear. However, the back of his throat is red and clogged with mucus. His eyes are lifeless, and the conjunctiva around them is a pinkish hue. It seems as though the right tympanic membrane is inflamed and red. The lymph nodes in the patient’s right cervical region appear enlarged, and they have a certain degree of tenderness.

Respiratory: Lacks acute distress, has an increased respiratory rate at the age of 28, clear breath sounds on auscultation, and speaks in complete sentences; bronchoscopy is negative. When you percussed his chest wall, you could hear a resonant tone, and his fremitus was normal and bilaterally consistent.

                Cardiovascular/Peripheral Vascular:

                Psychiatric:

                Neurological:

                Lymphatics:

OBJECTIVE DATA:

                Physical Exam:

Vital signs:

General: During the course of the interview, the patient appears exhausted and coughs several times. Additionally, he seems to be steady.

HEENT: The head is atraumatic and has a normocephalic shape. The mucus membrane is wet, and the discharge from the nose is clear. However, the back of his throat is red and clogged with mucus. His eyes are lifeless, and the conjunctiva around them is a pinkish hue. It seems as though the right tympanic membrane is inflamed and red. The lymph nodes in the patient’s right cervical region appear enlarged, and they have a certain degree of tenderness.

Respiratory: Lacks acute distress, has an increased respiratory rate at the age of 28, clear breath sounds on auscultation, and speaks in complete sentences; bronchoscopy is negative. When you percussed his chest wall, you could hear a resonant tone, and his fremitus was normal and bilaterally consistent.

Cardiology: In S1 and S2, there were no murmurs, gallops, or rubs.

Lymphatics: When palpated, the lymph nodes in the right cervical region are tender.

Psychiatric: No mental issues noted.

Diagnostics/Labs (Include any labs, x-rays, or other diagnostics that are needed to develop the                 differential diagnoses.)

ASSESSMENT:

Based on the findings of the completed physical examination and the observations that were made, the following possible diagnoses can be made.

1. Common cold: The patient complains of having a stuffy nose and a sore throat, which are both symptoms of a common cold. This observation was also supported by the findings of a physical examination, which showed that the patient had swollen lymph nodes.
2. Streptococcus throat infection: The patient’s complaint of a sore throat suggests that they may have strep throat. On the other hand, symptoms like nausea, vomiting, headaches, and fever did not present themselves at any point.

iii. Rhinitis is another condition that could have been causing the patient’s symptoms, as they included stuffy nose, sore throat, and drainage from the nose. In addition to this, the patient has a history of recurrent ear infections throughout their lifetime.

1. Allergies and asthma: The patient does not have a history of allergic reactions. Nevertheless, it is possible that this condition will occur. This condition may have been the cause of the persistent cough. On the other hand, the patient does not exhibit any symptoms of wheezing, chest pain or tightness, or difficulty breathing.

NURS 6512 Lab Assignment Assessing the Abdomen Sample

Assessing the Abdomen  

Gastrointestinal disorders are common encounters in nursing practice with considerable public health impacts. Nurses and other healthcare providers should perform comprehensive history taking and physical examinations to develop accurate diagnoses and care plans. Therefore, this essay examines J.R.’s case study. J.R. presented to the hospital with complaints of having generalized abdominal pain that began three days ago. He has been experiencing diarrhea that has been unresponsive to any treatments adopted by the patient.  The essay analyzes additional subjective and objective information that should be obtained from the client if subjective and objective data supports the assessment, diagnostic tests, and possible differential diagnoses.  

Additional Subjective Information 

Additional subjective information should be obtained to guide the development of an accurate diagnosis. First, information about the things that might have led to the abdominal pain should be obtained. This includes data such as diet, alcohol consumption, or possible trauma that could have led to the symptoms. Information about previous experiences of stomach pain should also be obtained. A previous history of stomach pain will help the nurse determine if the condition is acute or chronic. In addition, the nurse should determine if JR experienced a similar pain when he experienced gastrointestinal bleeding four years ago. Information on previous treatments for the GI bleed should be obtained to guide the current management. The nurse should also seek information about the characteristics of stomach pain (Maret-Ouda et al., 2020). For example, information on whether the pain radiates elsewhere should have been obtained to rule out causes such as pancreatitis.  

Information about the character of the diarrhea should also be obtained. Information such as blood-stained diarrhea would help the nurse to develop a potential diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Associated symptoms such as vomiting should also be obtained. This is important because symptoms such as projectile vomiting will indicate potential problems such as pyloric stenosis. Information about changes in the client’s weight over the past few months should also be obtained. Unintentional weight loss could indicate other health problems such as cancer of the gastrointestinal system. Information on changes in appetite should also be sought. Early satiety could indicate problems such as hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. The nurse should also obtain information about the factors that relieve, precipitate, or worsen the stomach pain. For example, a diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease will be made if the symptoms worsen 15-30 minutes after eating (Sverdén et al., 2019). A diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease will be made if the symptoms worsen when JR lies down and improves with sitting upright.  

Additional Objective Information 

The nurse should obtain additional objective information from JR to make an informed diagnosis and develop a patient-centered care plan. Firstly, information about JR’s general appearance should be documented. This includes information such as his grooming, weight, alertness, and orientation. A comprehensive review of all the body systems should have also been done. For example, the assessment of the respiratory system is inadequate. Information such as the presence or absence of nasal flaring, wheezes, crackles, rhonchi, and peripheral or central cyanosis should have been documented (Katz et al., 2022). The assessment of the cardiovascular system should have extended to information such as the presence or absence of jugular venous distention or peripheral edema.  

The information in the assessment of the gastrointestinal system is inadequate. Additional information such as the presence or absence of abdominal scars, organomegaly, pulsations, ascites, and visible blood vessels should have been documented. This is important because information such as palpable abdominal pulsations would indicate aortic abdominal aneurysm. Information about any abdominal pain on palpation and the location of the pain should have also been obtained and pain rating on a pain rating scale.  The nurse should have also assessed the skin for capillary refill, turgor, cyanosis, and edema (Haque & Bhargava, 2022). Low capillary refill and poor skin turgor could indicate problems with circulation and hydration.  

If Subjective and Objective Data Supports the Assessment 

Subjective assessment data is the information a patient gives about their health problems. Subjective data supports JR’s assessment. Some of the subjective data include his chief complaints, history of the chief complaints, past medical history, medications, allergies, family, and social history. Objective data refers to the information that the healthcare provider obtains during assessment. Healthcare providers use methods such as inspection, palpation, percussion, and auscultation to obtain objective data (Malik et al., 2023). Objective data supports JR’s case study. Examples of objective data in the case study include vital signs and findings reported in the assessment of the heart, lungs, skin, and abdomen.  

Appropriate Diagnostic Tests 

Some diagnostic tests should be performed to develop JR’s accurate diagnosis. An occult stool test should be performed to determine if the client’s problem is due to an infection and rule out GI bleeding. A complete blood count test would also be performed to rule out an infection. Stool culture might also be performed to determine the accurate cause of JR’s problem. Antigen tests might also be performed to detect antigens associated with parasites and viruses that cause gastrointestinal problems such as gastroenteritis. A fecal fat test might be needed to rule out malabsorption problems in the client (Chen et al., 2021). Radiological investigations such as abdominal ultrasound and x-rays might be performed to rule out causes such as appendicitis and carcinoma.  

Accepting or Rejecting the Current Diagnosis 

I will accept the current diagnosis of left lower quadrant pain. The objective findings reveal the presence of left lower quadrant pain. This provisional diagnosis should guide the additional investigations performed to develop an accurate diagnosis. I also accept gastroenteritis as the other diagnosis for JR. Patients with gastroenteritis experience symptoms such as diarrhea, abdominal pain and cramping, nausea, vomiting, and loss of appetite (Chen et al., 2021).  JR has these symptoms; hence, gastroenteritis is his other provisional diagnosis.  

Three Possible Differential Diagnoses 

Diverticulitis is the first differential diagnosis that should be considered for JR. Diverticulitis is an inflammation of the sigmoid colon that causes left lower quadrant pain. The pain worsens when a patient eats. The accompanying symptoms include diarrhea, constipation, bloating, nausea, and the passage of bloodstained stool (Sugi et al., 2020). Diagnostic investigations will rule in or out diverticulitis as the cause of JR’s problems.  

The second differential diagnosis that should be considered for JR is peptic ulcer disease. Peptic ulcer disease is a condition that develops from the destruction of the stomach wall lining by pepsin or gastric acid secretion. It affects the distal duodenum, lower esophagus, or jejunum. Patients often experience epigastric pain 15-30 minutes after a meal. A diagnosis of duodenal ulcer disease is made if the patient reports epigastric pain 2-3 hours after a meal (Malik et al., 2023; Sverdén et al., 2019). The additional symptoms that patients with peptic ulcer disease experience include bloating, abdominal fullness, nausea and vomiting, hematemesis, melena, and changes in body weight.  

Gastritis is the last differential diagnosis that should be considered for JR. Gastritis develops from the inflammation of the gastric mucosa. Factors such as infections, smoking, taking too much alcohol, prolonged use of aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and immune-mediated reactions might cause gastritis. Patients who are affected by gastritis experience a range of symptoms. They include stomach pain or upset, hiccups, belching, abdominal bleeding, nausea and vomiting, feeling of fullness, loss of appetite, and blood in stool or vomitus (Maret-Ouda et al., 2020; Rugge et al., 2020). Therefore, additional investigations should be performed to develop JR’s accurate diagnosis and treatment plan.  

Conclusion 

In summary, JR’s subjective and objective data is inadequate. Additional subjective and objective data should be obtained to guide the treatment plan. Subjective and objective data supports JR’s assessment. I accept the current diagnosis of left lower quadrant pain and gastroenteritis.. Different diagnostic investigations should be performed to rule in and out different differential diagnoses in the case study. The three differential diagnoses that should be considered for JR include gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, and diverticulitis.  

References 

Chen, P. H., Anderson, L., Zhang, K., & Weiss, G. A. (2021). Eosinophilic Gastritis/Gastroenteritis. Current Gastroenterology Reports, 23(8), 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-021-00809-2 

Haque, K., & Bhargava, P. (2022). Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. American Family Physician, 106(2), 165–172. 

Katz, P. O., Dunbar, K. B., Schnoll-Sussman, F. H., Greer, K. B., Yadlapati, R., & Spechler, S. J. (2022). ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 117(1), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001538 

Malik, T. F., Gnanapandithan, K., & Singh, K. (2023). Peptic Ulcer Disease. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534792/ 

Maret-Ouda, J., Markar, S. R., & Lagergren, J. (2020). Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Review. JAMA, 324(24), 2536–2547. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.21360 

Rugge, M., Sugano, K., Sacchi, D., Sbaraglia, M., & Malfertheiner, P. (2020). Gastritis: An Update in 2020. Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, 18(3), 488–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-020-00298-8 

Sugi, M. D., Sun, D. C., Menias, C. O., Prabhu, V., & Choi, H. H. (2020). Acute diverticulitis: Key features for guiding clinical management. European Journal of Radiology, 128, 109026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109026 

Sverdén, E., Agréus, L., Dunn, J. M., & Lagergren, J. (2019). Peptic ulcer disease. BMJ, 367, l5495. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5495