NURS 8114 Week 8: SEARCH-BASED QUESTIONS

Walden University NURS 8114 Week 8: SEARCH-BASED QUESTIONS– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 8114 Week 8: SEARCH-BASED QUESTIONS assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8114 Week 8: SEARCH-BASED QUESTIONS

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 8114 Week 8: SEARCH-BASED QUESTIONS depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8114 Week 8: SEARCH-BASED QUESTIONS

The introduction for the Walden University NURS 8114 Week 8: SEARCH-BASED QUESTIONS is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NURS 8114 Week 8: SEARCH-BASED QUESTIONS

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 8114 Week 8: SEARCH-BASED QUESTIONS assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 8114 Week 8: SEARCH-BASED QUESTIONS

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NURS 8114 Week 8: SEARCH-BASED QUESTIONS

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8114 Week 8: SEARCH-BASED QUESTIONS assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NURS 8114 Week 8: SEARCH-BASED QUESTIONS

Evaluation of Literature Research

There are numerous techniques to conduct a literature search, and the optimal method depends on the topic and the available resources. Nonetheless, I’ve outlined my strategy for reviewing research articles below:

I’ve always begun a literature search by selecting a study topic within a specific subject, developing keywords, and then using those keywords to find articles in the library and online databases. I begin with a generalized search, as this can be useful for developing a thorough search strategy. This will assist me in gaining an overview of the existing literature and focusing my research.

• Use keywords and subject terms pertinent to my topic when seeking relevant articles. I typically use databases that provide full-text publications from academic institutions, the Internet, or for a fee to save time when searching for my writing.

• After discovering numerous pertinent articles, I refined my search by adding additional keywords, restricting it to specific databases, or limiting it by date. I composed a report after conducting a literature evaluation. Typically, I start with the most recent issues of the periodicals to find research on my topic, then I progress backwards and follow the references at the conclusion of the articles to find additional study materials.

Once you have discovered a good search strategy, you should save it so that you can easily replicate it in the future. Lastly, I double-checked the articles’ accuracy and caliber. The library’s assistance resources, which I highly recommend to other researchers who might struggle with conducting a literature review search, made all of this possible. As I conduct my literature search, I keep note of the articles I discover and compile a list or spreadsheet of them, including the citation information and a summary of each. I am extremely appreciative of the Walden support resources.

Plan or search strategy for finding relevant, current literature.

In developing a search strategy for finding relevant literature, it is essential to identify key concepts or keywords associated with the topic of interest. These concepts can be used to search for relevant literature in various databases or sources, such as peer-reviewed journal articles or gray literature. The literature search should be conducted systematically, considering the quality and relevance of the literature to the research question or problem.Evaluate the literature identified, considering its quality and relevance to the research question or problem. Synthesize the literature identified, including a summary, analysis, and discussion of its implications for the research question or problem.

Developing a plan for further research based on the reviewed literature should include a discussion of the following steps to advance the research on the topic of interest: To address these issues, online school libraries should have a dedicated librarian or staff member responsible for the search, ensuring proper usage and access to necessary resources. Additionally, updated search engines should be invested in to filter inappropriate content and provide accurate results. Finally, training students and staff on using the library’s search engine is crucial for obtaining the necessary information.

Sample Answer 2 for NURS 8114 Week 8: SEARCH-BASED QUESTIONS

Thank you for your thoughtful insights into the process of literature review and the related search strategies. I can tell from your post that you’ve invested significant time and effort into refining this process, and it’s evident you have a strong understanding of the importance and complexity of this task. The process you’ve laid out—starting with a broad search, gradually narrowing it down, and finally organizing the data—is an excellent methodology, showcasing your ability to think critically and strategically about this fundamental research activity.

Your approach of starting with a broader search is particularly effective. When you first delve into a new topic, a wider lens can indeed give a comprehensive overview of the existing literature, from which you can start to discern patterns, trends, and gaps. This can then allow for a more focused, keyword-specific search that targets areas of particular interest or need.

I also highly commend your methodical documentation of discovered articles. Maintaining a record of all discovered articles, complete with citation information and summaries, is an excellent habit. It not only saves time and reduces the risk of duplication but also provides an organized repository of information to refer back to throughout your research.

That being said, the use of systematic review tools could significantly enhance your process. They can help manage and organize your search results, and offer features for removing duplicates, extracting data, and conducting quality assessments. Software such as Endnote, Mendeley, or Covidence, designed specifically for systematic reviews, could be instrumental in managing these various stages of your literature review. By automating some of these tasks, you can focus more on the actual analysis and interpretation of the literature, enhancing the depth and quality of your reviews.

Your suggestion of employing dedicated librarians to aid online literature searches is indeed an excellent one. Their specialized knowledge of resources and searching techniques could greatly benefit researchers. A dedicated library staff can provide personalized guidance and ensure that users are not just finding information but finding the most relevant and high-quality information. They can also help researchers navigate through complex databases and introduce them to resources they may not have discovered on their own.

Moreover, your insights on the need for improved search engine technology are spot-on. Enhancing search engine capabilities could significantly refine the results obtained during literature searches. Better filtering mechanisms would indeed increase the accuracy of search results, eliminating irrelevant or low-quality sources and thereby saving researchers’ valuable time.

Lastly, the point you raised about training students and staff to use library search engines effectively is vital. While investing in high-quality resources and technology is important, it is equally crucial to ensure that users understand how to effectively leverage these tools. Providing training can help users understand the full capabilities of these resources, enabling them to carry out more efficient and successful literature searches.

In conclusion, your reflections and suggestions are highly valuable. They have the potential to enhance not only your literature search processes but also those of anyone reading your post. Your commitment to the robustness and quality of your research is a model for all researchers. I believe your dedication will result in significant contributions to your field of study and look forward to hearing more about your research journey.

Sample Answer 3 for NURS 8114 Week 8: SEARCH-BASED QUESTIONS

My Literature Search

My literature search is an organized method used to locate already published data to identify a range of good quality references on a specific topic. The reasons for me performing a literature search is to draw information for making evidence-based guidelines. This is my research method and academic assessment. My literature search helps me formulate my research question by evaluating the literature. My literature search is done to locate the appropriate method and design of the study.  Performing a literature search helps me determine population sampled, sampling methods, methods of measuring concepts and techniques of analysis. It also helps me determine variables affecting the outcome and identifying faults that could be avoided.

What working for me is utilizing the Walden University Library. There is endless information available for one to review. There are multiple tips that will fit any research idea. There is numerous way to receive help with research, project formulation, project ideas, writing papers, and review of your information. Walden University provide the help needed when you have questions and when you need guidance.

Sample Answer 4 for NURS 8114 Week 8: SEARCH-BASED QUESTIONS

Scholars recommend using a systematic method of conducting a literature search (Littlewood & Kloukos, 2019). This paper describes the use of the 15-step process recommended by Bramer et al. (2018). This 15-step process has ensured relevant, recent, and scholarly articles.

In line with the framework provided by Bramer et al. (2018), the first step of conducting the literature search entailed determining a clear and focused question. The clinical question of interest is the impact of Hand Hygiene on Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs). The second step featured describing the articles that could answer the question (Bramer et al., 2018). The focus of the literature search was on systematic reviews and random controlled studies published in the last 5 years. Equally important was describing the key concepts addressing different elements of the question (Bramer et al., 2018). This step focused on hand hygiene practices in healthcare settings. The desired outcome, on the other hand, was the occurrence, prevalence, and incidence of healthcare-associated infections. Closely related was deciding the elements to use for best results (Bramer et al., 2018). This step focused on hand hygiene and healthcare-associated infections. Focusing on the two elements prevented bias and overlapping elements (Bramer et al., 2018). This step was followed by choosing an appropriate database (Bramer et al., 2018). The database that was chosen to start with is EBSCOhost. The search process was then documented in a log document to make the search accountable and reproducible (Bramer et al., 2018). Equally important was the process of identifying appropriate index terms in the database (Bramer et al., 2018). The focus here was on infection control, healthcare-associated infections, and preventing healthcare-associated infections. The next step focused on identifying synonyms (Bramer et al., 2018). For hand hygiene, the search also focused on handwashing. For healthcare-associated infections, on the other hand, the focus was also on healthcare-acquired infections, hospital-acquired infections, and hospital-associated infections. The next step entailed adding truncations, spelling differences, and abbreviations (Bramer et al., 2018). The search process, therefore, also included hyphens and abbreviations: HAIs, HH, hand-washing, hand washing, hospital acquired infections, health-care associated infections, and healthcare acquired infections. Equally important was adding Boolean operators and parentheses such as AND and OR. The search was then optimized using the aforementioned criterion. This step was followed by an evaluation of initial results (Bramer et al., 2018). This step entailed increasing sensitivity and specificity by deleting less relevant terms, adding new terms, and broadening proximity. These were the main issues of concern when conducting the literature search. Additional focus was on checking for any errors, including confirming the date of publishing and availability. This process was then replicated in the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases. It is worth noting that Goossen et al. (2020) recommend combining databases to ensure a broader picture of evidence.

In conclusion, scholars recommend applying a systematic process of conducting a literature search. The stepwise process recommended by Bramer et al. (2018) is fast, exhaustive, precise, and systematic. This approach is especially ideal for answering clinical questions.

References

Bramer, W., Jonge, G., Rethlefsen, M., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018). A systematic approach to searching: An efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 531-541. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.283

Goossen, K., Hess, S., Lunny, C., & Pieper, D. (2020). Database combinations to retrieve systematic reviews in overviews of reviews: A methodological study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00983-3

Littlewood, A., & Kloukos, D. (2019). Searching the literature for studies for a systematic review. Part 2: Resources for searching the medical literature. Statistics and Research Design, 155(3), 445-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.12.005

Sample Answer 5 for NURS 8114 Week 8: SEARCH-BASED QUESTIONS

Evaluation of Literature Research 

As cited in Discussion seven, I conducted a literature search formulated from the PICO model mentioned in Dang et al. (2021). The critical question is: For adult patients diagnosed with a severe mental illness (SMI) encountered by social determinants of health, does inter-professional collaboration improve accessibility to outpatient treatments and better health outcomes?  I utilized Walden’s Library via the academic portal to begin my research process. After analyzing the critical question, I found that Walden’s library via the academic portal is one of the most helpful tools made available for researching peer-reviewed articles. I began my literature review search through the nursing database using CINAHL (CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature) and MEDLINE combined search, which allowed me to gain access to thousands of peer-reviewed articles. CINAHL and MEDLINE are familiar search engines used in previous classes and my MSN degree program. I also utilized credible information obtained directly from the World Health Organization website and the most current publication, dated 2023. I am spending more time researching, reading, comparing, and discarding irrelevant articles that are not of high critical appraisal. 

Search Strategies and Finding Relevant, Current Research 

One article I researched under the CINAHL search tool was too broad, generating 25,167 findings for access to mental health. I added the word services; less than half of the articles specific to these keywords generated 10,301 articles. Narrowing the literature review to information supporting the critical claim was done by selecting health services under the subject heading and then selecting mental health services which generated 4,214 resources. After narrowing my search compared to utilizing CINAHL & MEDLINE Combined, 1754 articles were generated. The number of articles generated was not all relevant to my critical question.

Most of the time, I narrowed my search to peer-reviewed articles and rarely used book citations other than those offered in the course study. After narrowing my search for these peer-reviewed articles, I allocated 213 articles relevant to my practice question. Searching for the best articles relevant to my practice issue became daunting and disorganized. I also had to use the Boolean navigation to filter and apply more keywords relevant to my practice question. I had to create a system that would allow me to keep my literature review findings by categorizing them as the highest to lowest levels of evidence. I found 9 research articles ranging from level I to level V, of which four various ranges were used for discussion seven. Utilizing a more narrow search relevant to keywords worked best for me.

I purposefully synthesized a level V research article so that I could understand and compare the difference to highly rigorous literature relevant to my practice question. I also narrowed the expansion of the search engine for literature publications dated within the last five years, which allowed me to provide current knowledge. I became a little frustrated attempting to condense the amount of literature findings. However, three search fields are automatically populated, and I needed to narrow the research more by clicking on the plus sign located to the right of the last populated fields. After I figured out this simple task, allocating more relevant literature was easier, resulting in five populated fields. According to the readings of Dang et al. (2021), they suggested that the highest levels of research would provide the best critical appraisal when presenting the evidence-based practice (EBP) quality initiative (QI) research project. 

Specifications of the Search Process, Concerns, and Question(s)

Overall, I have had positive experiences except for two articles not being accessible due to a broken link. When working within time constraints, my concern is the turnaround time that it takes for a librarian to answer questions or assist students in locating similar articles. Ask the Librarian is a great resource, but it requires me to work ahead of schedule to be able to use this service. Walden’s general search library database did not work best in my literature review search. One search engine requires the individual to enter the exact name of the titles of articles, books, and other pieces of work. However, there was an article that I wavered on the level of rigorous evidence being too low. I should have written the author’s name or subject header down, and that specific search engine would have saved time in allocating the article.  

The other concern with using a general search and not using the filter options will exclude EBP case studies and some systematic reviews that would have been effective information to support my critical practice question. Utilizing the general research navigation and not keeping a proper ledger at the beginning of my articles and citations exhausted productive time that could have been used for other literature review findings. It was challenging trying to categorize the levels of the research articles when compared to Appendix H of the Synthesis Process and Recommendation Tool.  Question: My question is not about researching literature but trying to find additional resources or methods that will assist me with categorizing the literature review level of evidence. I may be overlooking a more specific way to approach Appendix H when it comes to categorizing the levels of evidence. 

References not needed 

Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Walen, M. (Eds.). (2021). Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice: Model and guidelines (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.