NURS 8201 WEEK 11 DISCUSSION: USING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS TO INFORM EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE

Walden University NURS 8201 WEEK 11 DISCUSSION: USING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS TO INFORM EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 8201 WEEK 11 DISCUSSION: USING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS TO INFORM EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8201 WEEK 11 DISCUSSION: USING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS TO INFORM EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 8201 WEEK 11 DISCUSSION: USING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS TO INFORM EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8201 WEEK 11 DISCUSSION: USING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS TO INFORM EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE

The introduction for the Walden University NURS 8201 WEEK 11 DISCUSSION: USING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS TO INFORM EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NURS 8201 WEEK 11 DISCUSSION: USING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS TO INFORM EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 8201 WEEK 11 DISCUSSION: USING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS TO INFORM EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 8201 WEEK 11 DISCUSSION: USING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS TO INFORM EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NURS 8201 WEEK 11 DISCUSSION: USING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS TO INFORM EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8201 WEEK 11 DISCUSSION: USING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS TO INFORM EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NURS 8201 WEEK 11 DISCUSSION: USING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS TO INFORM EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE

Introduction

Due to their improved ability to evaluate a wide range of health conditions, both quantitative and qualitative approaches have become more relevant in clinical practice. The amalgamation of these research approaches has facilitated the attainment of a satisfactory compromise between the limitations of one approach and the advantages of another. This technique combines multiple methods of problem analysis and assessment, enabling a deeper understanding of the underlying health issues (Gray & Grove, 2020). For the purpose of treating chronic pain, for instance, a quantitative method can be employed to gauge pain severity. On the other hand, a qualitative method can shed light on how the patient’s everyday life is impacted by the pain. It is possible to undertake a quantitative assessment of pain by employing the pertinent patient profile measurements. Similarly, the qualitative method would be more trustworthy to determine the degree to which the patient’s discomfort interferes with their daily activities due to its emphasis on descriptive details (Santos et al., 2022). Techniques that can sufficiently explain the seeming irregularities and peculiarities of pain are included in the qualitative method. In order to obtain the most appropriate and successful evidence-based therapies for managing and lowering pain and its related problems, a mixed method approach would be recommended.

Qualitative and quantitative to comprehend chronic pain

The Institute of Medicine recommends using treatments supported by scientific data to address a variety of medical conditions and improve overall management. To offer patient care that is high quality, sustainable over time, and highly effective, interventions that are supported by the best available evidence must be implemented in order to attain best practice (Santos et al., 2022). For instance, managing chronic pain in healthcare settings is one of the health issues in nursing practice that requires the integration of qualitative and quantitative solutions. In most medical conditions, especially long-term ones, pain is a major side effect. Rutberg and Bouikidis (2018) state that while determining and obtaining the best evidence-based treatments to address this health concern, nurses and other practitioners employ a mixed approach. In order to decide the best course of action, medical professionals use these tactics to build and unearth novel pain treatment outcomes. These results are then integrated with the body of existing knowledge.

Research Review: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods

Selecting, locating, and providing an analysis of the pertinent research necessitates the use of well-organized, repeatable techniques in systematic reviews. In addition, data collection and analysis from the selected studies are part of systematic reviews. A combination of quantitative and qualitative methodologies can be employed in mixed methods systematic reviews to promote evidence-based practice. This method offers a more thorough and nuanced knowledge of the research subject by combining the advantages of qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Both quantitative and qualitative research are  included in mixed methods systematic reviews, and the results are combined to present a more comprehensive image of the problem at hand (Shorten & Smith, 2017). Generally speaking, systematic reviews gather information from multiple sources in a consistent style to create a thorough and impartial summary of the results (Gray & Grove, 2020). These assessments have been carefully written with the intention of addressing urgent issues and providing solutions to important nursing difficulties. Systematic reviews employ both qualitative and quantitative research methods to achieve this aim. This guarantees the application of evidence-based nursing practices.

Mixed Methods Approach

In order to arrive at current and freshly recommended practices, nursing professionals and other decision-makers heavily rely on the application of mixed methodologies. Healthcare practitioners can combine quantitative harm and benefit estimations with a more in-depth grasp of the patient’s perspective by using mixed approaches (Shorten & Smith, 2017). For example, quantitative techniques like statistical analysis, surveys, and randomized controlled trials can yield information on the prevalence, severity, and efficacy of various interventions for chronic pain. This can provide an accurate view of the scope of the issue and the viable fixes with the strongest supporting data.

Conclusion

Conversely, qualitative techniques like focus groups, interviews, and case studies can offer a more profound comprehension of the realities faced by people with persistent pain. From a patient-centered standpoint, they can shed light on the effects of chronic pain on day-to-day functioning, the obstacles to receiving care, and the efficacy of various interventions. Researchers can fully comprehend chronic pain, its causes, and potential remedies by integrating these two approaches (Shorten & Smith, 2017). For instance, by combining quantitative and qualitative approaches, researchers can determine the best ways to manage chronic pain while also learning how it impacts the quality of life and pain perception of those who experience it. This may result in more patient-centered and efficient treatments that cater to the unique requirements of people with chronic pain. As a result, the use of mixed techniques is crucial in nursing practice since it facilitates thorough comprehension of the problems and well-informed decision-making. It presents substantial scientific evidence specific to each person’s experiences while striking a balance between quantitative data and qualitative comprehension.

References

Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2020). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). Elsevier

Rutberg, S., & Bouikidis, C. D. (2018). Focusing on the fundamentals: A simplistic differentiation between qualitative and quantitative research. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 45(2),209-213https://www.proquest.com/openview/af62fd5b0442e59b2729d9fcf7348456/1

Shorten, A., & Smith, J. (2017). Mixed methods research: expanding the evidencebase. Evidence-based nursing, 20(3), 74-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/eb-2017-102699

Santos, F. D. R. P., Nascimento, I. T. M., Brito, L. B., Blascovich, H. B., Moço, J. D. S. T., & Silva, R. M. D. (2022). Profile, attitudes and beliefs of physiotherapists in themanagement of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Fisioterapia em Movimento, 35

Sample Answer 2 for NURS 8201 WEEK 11 DISCUSSION: USING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS TO INFORM EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE

Healthcare research is a systematic inquiry intended to generate robust evidence about important issues in the fields of medicine and healthcare. The challenge in chronic pain management is multifaceted, involving both proper diagnosis and management, as well as responsible use of pain medications amidst concerns about addiction and the opioid epidemic (Eccles et al., 2021). Qualitative methods, like focus groups or interviews, can provide insight into patients’ experiences and perspectives on living with chronic pain, while quantitative methods, such as surveys or randomized controlled trials, can offer data on treatment outcomes and effectiveness.

Qualitative research has ample possibilities within the arena of healthcare research (Renjith et al., 2021). A qualitative methods approach in research provides a deeper understanding of chronic pain challenges by exploring individuals’ experiences, perceptions, and meanings through open-ended data collection (interviews, focus groups, diaries) and analysis (thematic, content analysis). This approach uncovers contextual, nuanced insights into the complexities and subjective nature of chronic pain, its impact on daily life, and individual preferences for management and treatment (Renjith et al., 2021). For example, a 2020 qualitative study published in the Australian Journal of Primary Health explored the experiences of individuals with chronic non-cancer pain in primary care (Gilkes et al., 2023). The study revealed the importance of understanding pain’s emotional and social dimensions, participants’ frustration with healthcare services, and the need for individualized and holistic approaches to care.

A quantitative methods approach in research can provide a clearer understanding of the challenges associated with chronic pain and potential solutions by surveying large sample sizes to identify patterns and trends in chronic pain prevalence, impact, and management. Additionally, a quantitative methods approach could be used to conduct randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness of various interventions, such as medications, physical therapy, or mindfulness programs (Pei et al., 2021). By employing quantitative methods, researchers can generate robust and generalizable data that can inform evidence-based solutions for chronic pain management.

A mixed methods approach combines these strengths, offering a comprehensive understanding of the problem and potential solutions. In healthcare, mixed methods can help address complex issues like patient satisfaction, health disparities, and treatment efficacy (Irvine et al., 2020). By integrating qualitative and quantitative methods, researchers can develop a richer understanding of the problem and inform evidence-based practice. Additionally, according to a 2020 study published in the Journal of Patient Experience, mixed methods research can explore the experiences and perceptions of individuals with chronic pain (qualitative aspect) while also analyzing quantitative data on pain intensity and treatment outcomes (Hadi et al., 2019). This integrated approach can reveal nuanced insights into the challenges and potential solutions for chronic pain management.

References

Eccles, J. A., & Davies, K. A. (2021). The Challenges of Chronic Pain and Fatigue. Clinical medicine (London, England), 21(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2020-1009Links to an external site.

Gilkes, L., Bulsara, C., & Mavaddat, N. (2023). Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Management – Insights from Australian General Practitioners: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 29(4), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY22144

Hadi, M. A., McHugh, G. A., & Closs, S. J. (2019). Impact of Chronic Pain on Patients’ Quality of Life: A Comparative Mixed-Methods Study. Journal of Patient Experience, 6(2), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373518786013

Irvine, F. E., Clark, M. T., Efstathiou, N., Herber, O. R., Howroyd, F., Gratrix, L., Sammut, D., Trumm, A., Hanssen, T. A., Taylor, J., & Bradbury, J. C. (2020). The State of Mixed Methods Research in Nursing: A Focused Mapping Review and Synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 76(11), 2798–2809. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14479Links to an external site.

Pei, J.-H., Ma, T., Nan, R.-L., Chen, H.-X., Zhang, Y.-B., Gou, L., & Dou, X.-M. (2021). Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treating Chronic Pain A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 26(3), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1849746

Renjith, V., Yesodharan, R., Noronha, J. A., Ladd, E., & George, A. (2021). Qualitative Methods in Health Care Research. International journal of preventive medicine, 12, 20. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_321_19

Sample Answer 3 for NURS 8201 WEEK 11 DISCUSSION: USING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS TO INFORM EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE

Mixed-Method

The mixed-method encompasses both qualitative and quantitative methods. The mixed-method has become common in recent times due to the growing complexity of nursing (Campbell, Tam-Tham, Dhaliwal, Manns, Hemmelgarn, Sanmartin, & King-Shier, 2017). An example of a mixed-method can be demonstrated by research conducted to determine the stress levels of nurses in a psychiatric ward. The research would first involve a quantitative approach, which will entail the collection of data based on the level of stress of the participants. A 5-point Likert scale could be deployed to measure the level of stress. The data could then be analyzed using quantitative statistical methods such as mean, mode, standard deviation, and t-test to determine whether the stress levels are normal. Once the quantitative study has been completed, a qualitative study could be carried out to assess nurses’ experiences in the psychiatric ward that could result in escalated stress levels. Data could be collected using interviews. The data analysis could involve determining topics and drawing relevant themes (Campbell et al., 2017).

The mixed method has several advantages in research. First, the research can quantify data and further explore other relevant themes that a quantitative study cannot determine. This results in better enrichment of evidence and a comprehensive understanding of the research question (Oliveira, Magalhães, & MisueMatsuda, 2018). The other advantage is that participants can give more details in a mixed-method hence more accurate research. The mixed method also has several limitations. The first limitation is its complexity. The method requires thorough training to ensure researchers conduct the exercise effectively. The other limitation is that it might require more resources. Additional personnel and lengthy research periods could be witnessed in the mixed method compared to the single methods. A multidisciplinary team might also be required to conduct the research. The multidisciplinary team might not be readily available.

References

Campbell, D. J., Tam-Tham, H., Dhaliwal, K. K., Manns, B. J., Hemmelgarn, B. R., Sanmartin, C., & King-Shier, K. (2017). Use of mixed methods research in research on coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension: a scoping review. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 10(1), e003310.

Oliveira, J. L. C. D., Magalhães, A. M. M. D., & MisueMatsuda, L. (2018). Métodos mistos na pesquisa em enfermagem: possibilidades de aplicação à luz de Creswell. Texto & Contexto-Enfermagem, 27(2).

Sample Answer 4 for NURS 8201 WEEK 11 DISCUSSION: USING QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS TO INFORM EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE

This is insightful. The use of mixed-methods in nursing is becoming more common than ever before. Nurses are faced with an increasingly complex world, but they still need to take care all their patients’ needs and wants; this means employing both qualitative research methods like observation or interviews on one side–as well quantitative approaches such A systematic review which can then lead into data collection(quant) (Oliveira et al., 2018). There are both advantages and disadvantages to using mixed qualitative and quantitative research methods in healthcare. On the one hand, using a mix of methods can help to provide a more complete picture of what is happening with patients and their care (Headley & Plano, 2020). On the other hand, there can be some disadvantages to using a mix of methods, including:

– Increased complexity: The use of multiple methods can make it more difficult to understand the data and draw conclusions from it.

– Increased time and effort: Using multiple methods can require more time and effort than using a single method (McCrudden & Marchand, 2020).

– Potential for bias: When different methods are used, it is possible for the results to be biased in favor of one method or another.

Question: How does the application of mixed methods, qualitative and quantitative study affect the quality of the research outcomes?

References

Headley, M. G., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2020). Multilevel mixed methods research designs: Advancing a refined definition. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(2), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819844417

McCrudden, M. T., & Marchand, G. (2020). Multilevel mixed methods research and educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 55(4), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1793156

Oliveira, J. L. C. D., Magalhães, A. M. M. D., & MisueMatsuda, L. (2018). Métodos mistos na pesquisa em enfermagem: possibilidades de aplicação à luz de Creswell. Texto & Contexto-Enfermagem, 27. https://www.scielo.br/j/tce/a/MgZqzF7DmdTKhJrZk7QDSJQ/abstract/?lang=pt