NURS 8201 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: USE OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Walden University NURS 8201 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: USE OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 8201 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: USE OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8201 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: USE OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 8201 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: USE OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8201 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: USE OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

The introduction for the Walden University NURS 8201 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: USE OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NURS 8201 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: USE OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 8201 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: USE OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 8201 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: USE OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NURS 8201 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: USE OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8201 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: USE OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NURS 8201 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: USE OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

De Groot, K., De Veer, A. J., Paans, W., & Francke, A. L. (2020). Use of electronic health

records and standardized terminologies.

Nursing documentation can raise the bar for nursing care because it is an essential source of information on patient’s needs and nursing interventions. Two examples of standardized terminology that should increase the accuracy of nursing documentation are the Omaha System and NANDA International. The introduction of electronic health records with standardized terminology may help nursing staff feel more assisted in providing nursing care, however, this is still up for debate. A cross-sectional survey with 667 Dutch registered nurses and certified nursing assistants was carried out using an electronic health record with the following objectives: to examine the standardized terminology used by nurses in electronic health records; to ascertain the extent to which they consider the use of electronic health records to be supportive; and to ascertain whether the standardized terminology used by nursing staff in electronic health records is associated with their sense of support. According to De Groot et al. (2020), the respondents were employed by hospitals, nursing homes, or mental health facilities.

Logistic or Linear Regression

The dependent variable in multiple linear regression analysis was the experienced support provided by electronic health records, while the independent variables were the use of standardized terminology (0=no, 1=yes) and sociodemographic characteristics (gender, age, educational attainment, healthcare setting). An analysis using multiple linear regression was then carried out to see whether there was a difference between different standardized terminology. The experienced support provided by electronic health records was the dependent variable in this analysis, while certain standardized terminologies and sociodemographic characteristics were the independent factors (Chi et al., 2017).

Statistical and Quantitative Techniques

Descriptive statistics were employed to characterize the characteristics of the respondents and provide an answer to the first and second research questions. The possible relationships between the use of standardized terminology and the respondent’s healthcare environment were also examined using Pearson’s chi-square test. A one-way ANOVA test was used to investigate if there was a difference in the degree to which respondents felt supported by the use of electronic health records between the respondents’ healthcare settings (Coughlan et al., 2007).

Strength and Weaknesses

A non-validated questionnaire was used because there isn’t one for the experiences of support nurses utilizing electronic health records. Nonetheless, questions were developed in consultation with subject-matter experts and based on the relevant literature.

A preliminary test of the questionnaire was conducted by nursing staff to ensure readability. As such, it is predicted that the questionnaire will demonstrate content validity. Notwithstanding these limitations, our work adds some intriguing knowledge to a nursing practice and research area that is still mostly uncharted territory. One of the study’s strengths is that it was the first to examine the experiences of nursing staff members who all worked in the four primary healthcare settings and had direct patient contact. Our study’s focus on the usage of several standardized terminologies rather than just one and its comparison of their applications is another benefit (De Groot et al., 2020).

Possible Remedies

According to a survey, nursing staff members regularly expressed dissatisfaction with the use of their electronic health data. A different survey study with similar findings also showed that the inadequate usage of electronic health records places a great deal of time pressure on registered nurses. However, there is a lack of understanding of the relationship between the ease of use of electronic health records and the time restrictions related to nursing documentation (Tsai et al., 2020).

References

Chi, C.-Y., Wu, H.-H., Huang, C.-H., & Lee, Y.-C. (2017). Using linear regression to identify critical demographic variables affecting patient safety culture from the viewpoints of physicians and nurses.Hospital Practices and Research,2(2), 47-53.https://doi.org/10.15171/hpr.2017.12

Coughlan, M., Cronin, P., & Ryan, F. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. part 1: Quantitative research. British Journal of Nursing,16(11), 658-663.https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2007.16.11.23681

De Groot, K., De Veer, A. J., Paans, W., & Francke, A. L. (2020). Use of electronic health records and standardized terminologies: A nationwide survey of nursing staff experiences.International Journal of Nursing Studies,104, 103523.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103523

Tsai, C., Eghdam, A., Davoody, N., Wright, G., Flowerday, S., & Koch, S. (2020). Effects of electronic health record implementation and barriers to adoption and use: A scoping review and qualitative analysis of the content.Life,10(12),327.https://doi.org/10.3390/life10120327

Sample Answer 2 for NURS 8201 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: USE OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Week 7/ifeanuli

.Analyze the importance of this study to evidence-based practice,

Using this article: Strengthening Moral Courage Among Nurse Leaders.

This research involves nurse managers and interim managers in the practice that work in large non-profit hospital. The total of 27 nurse leaders received an invitation, 16manager, one supervisor and three nurse directors. 16 nurse mangers qualified for the research.

Th goals and purposes of the research study that the article describes the organizations and healthcare systems today and how they are in great need of moral leadership. Organizations and healthcare systems today are in great need of moral leadership. The influence of morally courageous nurses, regardless of position, is critically needed to transform healthcare and the future of Nursing report has called for more nurses to advance their education, the potential for nurse leaders to demonstrate increased moral courage is exciting. As nurse leaders in the healthcare system and in specific facilities, we need to demonstrate moral courage and create environments that promote morally courageous acts so as to keep us centered on the very thing that drew us into healthcare, namely the patient, the families, and the communities we serve.

How is linear or logistic regression used in the study? What are the results of its use? 

Sixteen nurse managers from various acute care and post acute care services participated in the project. Their mean age was 43.1 (SD = 8.2) years; the mean years of nursing management experience was 6.4 (SD = 7.5); and the mean years of nursing experience was 18.3 (SD =8.4). Most of the participants were women (94%). Overall, nurses’ responses were positive both before the class (scores ranged from 4.7 to 7.0) and after the class (scores ranged from 5.0 to 7.0). Table 1 presents the five themes that were assessed using the PMCS and compares the pre-and post-class results of PMCS scores. The ‘Going Beyond Compliance’ theme showed statistically significant improvement from 6.0 before the class to 6.4 after the class (p < 0.05) with a t = 2.26. There were positive trends in responses to other themes (ranging from 0.1 to 0.3). Overall PMCS showed marginal improvement from 6.1 in the pre class to 6.2 in the post class (p = 0.050) with a t = 2.13.

What other quantitative and statistical methods could be used to address the research issue discussed in the article? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the study?

This research intervention was designed to increase the acts of moral courage in nurse leaders, to decrease or alleviate moral distress, and ultimately to prevent moral residue. It emerged through evidence translation from the literature describing direct-care nurses’ experiences with moral distress and the most effective interventions to relieve this distress.

Reference

Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2020). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). Elsevier.

Edmonson, C. (2015). Strengthening Moral Courage Among Nurse Leaders. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 20(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol20No02PPT01

Sample Answer 3 for NURS 8201 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: USE OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

I enjoyed your discussion and arguments in this week’s discussion post. The selected article sought to examine and investigate the standardized terminologies used by nursing personnel in electronic health records. The article followed a nationwide survey of the experiences of nursing staff with regards to the use of different standardized terminologies in electronic health. As you have pointed out, the use of standardized nursing terminologies has been closely associated with a significant improvement and prediction power in patient outcomes as well as in organizational outcomes (De Groot et al., 2020).

The study described in your selected article relied on linear regression to evaluate and examine the existing relationships between the independent and dependent variables. The dependent variables in the study were specific standardized terminologies and socio-demographic data while the independent variable was the experienced support offered by electronic health records. The results of the linear regression conducted in the study indicated that there were no statistically significant disparities in the perceived support offered by electronic health records among nurses who utilized standardized terminologies and those who did not. There was also no statistically significant disparity on the perceived support offered by electronic health records and the demographics datasets of age, gender and educational level (De Groot et al., 2020).

In addition to linear regression, an alternative statistical method that could have been used to address the research issue discussed in your selected article is the Pearson correlational coefficient. The Pearson correlational coefficient provides an effective framework for researchers to measure and examine the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables (Grey & Grove, 2020). A Pearson correlational coefficient value of 1 or -1 would indicate a very strong correlation between two variables. A positive correlation would indicate that an increase in one variable would lead to an increase in the other variable while a negative correlation would indicate that an increase in one variable would lead to a decrease in the other variable.

References

De Groot, K., De Veer, A. J. E., Paans, W., & Francke, A. L. (2020). Use of electronic health records and standardized terminologies: A nationwide survey of nursing staff experiences. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 104(104), 103523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103523

Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2020). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). Elsevier

Sample Answer 4 for NURS 8201 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: USE OF REGRESSION ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

What are the goals and purposes of the research study that the article describes?

 The article for this discussion is Predictors of transformational leadership of nurse managers. The purpose of this research study was to examine the relationship among education, leadership experience, and emotional intelligence and if these factors are predictors of transformational leadership in nurse managers (Echevarria et al,  (2017). The goal of the study is to highlight effective leadership practices and prove that transformational leadership has been identified as a desirable leadership style that is a great contributor to effective outcomes in healthcare.

How is linear or logistic regression used in the study? What are the results of its use?
           

Linear regression is a procedure used to estimate the value of an outcome and explain the association between two variables (Gray & Grove 2020). A predictive correlational design was used to explore the relationship among the variables identified. The design compared the relationship between education and transformational leadership, leadership experience and transformational leadership, emotional intelligence and transformational leadership, and the relationship among education, leadership experience, emotional intelligence, and transformational leadership of nurse managers (Echevarria et al., 2017). The results showed the linear combination of the predictor variables education, leadership experience, and emotional intelligence predicted transformational leadership of nurse managers better than any other alone.

What other quantitative and statistical methods could be used to address the research issue discussed in the article?

The descriptive correlational design examines the presence and strength of relationships between and among variables (Gray & Grove K. 2020). By using this design, you would be able to examine the presence and strength of each variable between and among the variable being described which is transformational leadership of nurse managers.  
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the study? Remedies to address weakness. 
The strength of the study shows the variables that predicted transformational leadership in nurse managers found that emotional intelligence produced a significant correlation between the two variables. The study’s findings support the ANA position statement on the importance of emotional intelligence as a skill for nurse managers.  The report is well-written, organized, and well laid out. The purpose of the study was identified (examining the relationship among the variables), The framework used in the study was identified (descriptive correlation design), the statistical analysis was completed, the hypothesis was accepted, and the research hypothesis was rejected), the findings are linked back to the literature and recommendations for further research to be done with a random sampling method (Coughlan et al., 2007).  

The weaknesses of the study are the sample came from one organization (AONE) instead of multiple areas, the gender imbalance (more females than males), the differences in the education level of the group, and the location or primary work settings of the participants were unknown. Also, the type of instrument used to measure emotional intelligence and transformational leadership where bias is an issue. To address the study’s weakness, broaden the sample to other organizations or hospitals, separate the females and males, or recruit more males. In most hospitals the educational level for nurse managers is a bachelor’s degree, removing other degrees in the study to only include a bachelor’s degree.

Analyze the importance of this study to evidence-based practice, the nursing profession, or society. Be specific and provide examples.

This study is important to evidence-based practice because IOM (Institute of Medicine) reports regarding issues and the need for improvement and change in how leaders respond to healthcare issues and transform healthcare (Echevarria et al., 2017). According to the study a transformational leader is linked to leader effectiveness, and this is the desirable leadership style that is needed.

In my work place managers are pushed into positions without training, mentor, or development, most time this is revealed in how some managers lead their staff doing times of difficult conversations, staff speaking up for the safety of the patient and risky behaviors in caring for the patient. Not having a leader/manager with appropriate leadership development, and leader assessment programs with affect patient safety, health outcomes, nurse turnover, and many other factors in healthcare.

Reference:

Coughlan Michael, Cronin Patricia, & Ryan Frances. (2007). Step-by step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research. British Journal of Nursing , 16(11), 658-663. doi:10.12968/bjon.2007.1611.23681.
Echevarria Ilia M., Patterson Barbara J., and Krouse Anne. (2017). Predictors of transformational leadership of nurse managers. Journal of Nursing Management, 25, 167-175-DOI:10.111/jonm.12452.
Gray R. Jennifer, and Grove K. Susan. (2020). Burns & Grove’s The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of evidence (9th ed.). Elsevier.