NURS 8302 CLINICAL ASSIGNMENT 2: ORGANIZATION MEETING SUMMARY

Walden University NURS 8302 CLINICAL ASSIGNMENT 2: ORGANIZATION MEETING SUMMARY– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 8302 CLINICAL ASSIGNMENT 2: ORGANIZATION MEETING SUMMARY assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8302 CLINICAL ASSIGNMENT 2: ORGANIZATION MEETING SUMMARY

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 8302 CLINICAL ASSIGNMENT 2: ORGANIZATION MEETING SUMMARY depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8302 CLINICAL ASSIGNMENT 2: ORGANIZATION MEETING SUMMARY

The introduction for the Walden University NURS 8302 CLINICAL ASSIGNMENT 2: ORGANIZATION MEETING SUMMARY is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NURS 8302 CLINICAL ASSIGNMENT 2: ORGANIZATION MEETING SUMMARY

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 8302 CLINICAL ASSIGNMENT 2: ORGANIZATION MEETING SUMMARY assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 8302 CLINICAL ASSIGNMENT 2: ORGANIZATION MEETING SUMMARY

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NURS 8302 CLINICAL ASSIGNMENT 2: ORGANIZATION MEETING SUMMARY

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8302 CLINICAL ASSIGNMENT 2: ORGANIZATION MEETING SUMMARY assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NURS 8302 CLINICAL ASSIGNMENT 2: ORGANIZATION MEETING SUMMARY

It is important to identify an organization where the proposed quality improvement initiative is to be implemented. Therefore, the organization is a big healthcare center. The organization offers preventive, curative and disease management services. The facility also serves the community around it. The first step entailed holding a meeting with the organization’s leaders, including, the nurse managers, critical care nurses, and nurse leaders. The individuals were chosen with the focus on each playing a critical role in relation to the proposed quality improvement initiative on sepsis (Choy et al.,2021). The nurse managers let the group know about cases of sepsis and some of the challenges that nurses face when handling such cases. The nurse leader also explained the negative impacts of the problems and some of the strategies the organization has tried in the past to help manage the problem better for better outcomes. The critical care nurses and those who work in various admission wards also shared their experience with sepsis and some of the barriers to effective management. As such, the purpose of this assignment is to offer the summary of the meeting held with the organization.

The organization was approached by writing an official letter, which was addressed to the organization’s leader, who then approved a meeting together with the identified hospital officials. The manager was willing to help and allow the proposed project to be carried out in the facility. The organization was selected due to its location size and the healthcare services it provides to patients. It is important to note that the chosen organization has key individuals who oversee the students undertaking DNP projects in the facility. The importance of research in the organization has made the organization develop a framework where the DNP students are offered help by the professional nurses in the organization. They help the DNP students access important information and inform them what they need to ensure that they adhere to the organization’s rules.

Description of the DNP Project

It was important to succinctly explain the DNP project process at Walden University. Therefore, as a starting point I first explained the project by highlighting the gap that was identified at the facility. The problem or gap was the need to timeously identify the symptoms of sepsis (Husabø et al.,2020). I explained that there is a need to conduct a teaching program to educate nurses on the assessment and identification of sepsis symptoms to prevent the chances of sepsis or sepsis shock occurring. I explained that the nurses need to develop confidence in dealing with the problem.

The participants were eager to know more about the identified gap and the proposed solution. As such, one of the questions they asked was the extent of the identified problem and whether it is worth formulating a quality improvement initiative. As a response, I indicated that the problem was identified, and the nurses working in the admission units agreed that the problem needs to be addressed since the problem is usually identified late, which then leads to serious problems or issues. The possible gap to be addressed by the DNP project was identified by checking the organization’s records and data regarding cases of sepsis, which was compared to the benchmark data. As such, it was agreed that there is a need for improvement.

The identified gap was nurses’ lack of sufficient knowledge and confidence in identifying sepsis and assessing patients for early sepsis symptoms. The need to identify sepsis symptoms in clinical settings is a problem well documented in the literature. For example, a recent study by Kim and Park (2019) demonstrated the existence of the problem and the need for early recognition for optimized treatment. In addition, Moore et al. (2019) also conducted a study on sepsis and revealed its negative impacts. They showed that using a three-hour sepsis bundled care can improve outcomes. The proposed approach for this quality improvement project is the use of staff education, where the nurses will be educated on how to identify early sepsis symptoms and the relevant actions to take. The organization’s representative also had various questions regarding the proposed project. One of them is how to obtain the resources needed for the project. The answer was that the available resources would largely be used and integrated with acquired resources. Therefore, the staff education would be cost-effective. The proposed practice change supports positive social change, diversity, equity, and inclusion in various ways. The training would help nurses identify symptoms early enough. Therefore, it will promote health equity by reducing disparities in sepsis outcomes among people from different demographic groups.

The Project Team

It is important to identify the project team as they play a crucial role in the project. Therefore, key stakeholders and potential team members were identified to help address the gap in practice that has been identified (Candon et al.,2022). The identified individuals included critical care nurses, nurses working in the admission units, the finance manager, the nurse managers, the organization leader, and the project manager. The nurses working in critical care units and those working in the admission departments will be at the forefront of the project as they are the ones who are to get staff education to improve their skills and confidence regarding sepsis care. The nurse manager will play a critical role in coordinating the project from start to finish. They will also play an important role in offering feedback regarding the challenges, success, and what needs to be accomplished at various stages of the project. The financial manager will help in carrying out the cost-benefit analysis and the financial implications of the project. This role will be key to help support the early assertions that this project is feasible. The project mentor will play a crucial role in guiding the DNP student throughout the project.

Next Steps

It is important to explore the relevant steps that need to be followed next to ensure that the project is a success. The success of the project depends on various aspects such as stakeholder buy-in and ensuring that the required resources are availed and available. Therefore, as part of the plan, it is important to look at all the aspects of resources (Bernstein et al.,2020). The human resources needed for the success of the project include the nursing staff working in the organization, the nurse manager, and the organization’s financial manager or officer. One of the questions that dominated the session was the resources required for the project. As such, a rough budget was requested. It was agreed that a budget estimate be availed for further discussions and potential actions as appropriate. In addition, it is important to note that further meetings were planned to help refine the project goals, objectives, and activities which should be accomplished to ensure that the project is a success.

Evidence

Summary

The meeting was important in letting the relevant individuals know more about the project and answer questions as appropriate. Another strength is that the meeting was appropriately attended. One of the things I would do differently is have a document with complete statistics on the identified problem. It will be important to obtain relevant information before meeting the faculty advisor. For example, I need the agreement made with the organization to show that the organization has allowed the project to proceed.

References

Bernstein, S. L., Weiss, J., & Curry, L. (2020). Visualizing implementation: contextual and organizational support mapping of stakeholders (COSMOS). Implementation Science Communications, 1(1), 1-11. Doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00030-8

Candon, M., Williams, N., Zentgraf, K., Buttenheim, A., Bewtra, M., Beidas, R. S., & Stewart, R. E. (2022). Variation in stakeholder preferences for implementing evidence-based practices in behavioral health care. Psychiatric Services, 73(11), 1270-1273. Doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100453

Choy, C. L., Liaw, S. Y., Goh, E. L., See, K. C., & Chua, W. L. (2022). Impact of sepsis education for healthcare professionals and students on learning and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Journal of Hospital Infection, 122, 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2022.01.004

Husabø, G., Nilsen, R. M., Flaatten, H., Solligård, E., Frich, J. C., Bondevik, G. T., … & Hovlid, E. (2020). Early diagnosis of sepsis in emergency departments, time to treatment, and association with mortality: an observational study. PLoS One, 15(1), e0227652. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227652

Kim, H. I., & Park, S. (2019). Sepsis: Early recognition and optimized treatment. National center for biotechnology information https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304323/

Moore, W. R., Vermuelen, A., Taylor, R., Kihara, D., & Wahome, E. (2019). Improving 3-Hour Sepsis Bundled Care Outcomes: Implementation of a Nurse-Driven Sepsis Protocol in the Emergency Department. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 45(6), 690–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2019.05.005

Shakeel, S., Iffat, W., Nesar, S., Shayan, S., Ali, A., Gajdács, M., & Jamshed, S. (2022). Prompt Identification of Sepsis on Hospital Floors: Are Healthcare Professionals Ready for the Implementation of the Hour-1 Bundle?. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, 7(10), 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7100291 Semanco, M., Wright, S., & Rich, R. L. (2022). Improving initial sepsis management through a nurse-driven rapid response team protocol. Critical Care Nurse, 42(5), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2022608