NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 2 Factors That Impact Population Health
Walden University NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 2 Factors That Impact Population Health-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 2 Factors That Impact Population Health assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 2 Factors That Impact Population Health
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 2 Factors That Impact Population Health depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 2 Factors That Impact Population Health
The introduction for the Walden University NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 2 Factors That Impact Population Health is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 2 Factors That Impact Population Health
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 2 Factors That Impact Population Health assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 2 Factors That Impact Population Health
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 2 Factors That Impact Population Health
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 2 Factors That Impact Population Health assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 2 Factors That Impact Population Health
Summary of the Selected Public Health Initiative
My selected public health initiative is the national action plan (NAP) for combating multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). The United States (U.S.) initiated the NAP against the MDR-TB to expand global efforts to fight the disease, save lives, and prevent its spread both in the U.S. and worldwide. The NAP to combat the MDR-TB identifies a set of targeted interventions that address the core domestic and global challenges posed by MDR-TB (The United States Agency for International Development [USAID], 2020). The main goals of the NAP include strengthening domestic capacity to combat MDR-TB, improving the international capacity and collaboration against MDR-TB, and accelerating basic and applied research and development to combat MDR-TB (De Vries et al., 2017). For more information about NAP, click:
Analysis of the Selected Public Health Initiative
The rise in drug-resistant TB and the outbreaks of MDR-TB pose serious underlying problems in the health care infrastructure in the U.S. For instance, there is an increasing proportion of TB in people who were born in other countries or who are homeless, who have a mental illness or substance use, or other socioeconomic or medical problems, such as HIV, that make compliance with treatment difficult (De Vries et al., 2017; Nash et al., 2021). Thus, cultural concepts about illness causation and associated behaviors should be considered priorities to facilitate improvement in the initiative performance. Also, unethical exposure of TB patients to discriminative issues due to prejudice and bias from health care workers may negatively impact the initiative (Nash et al., 2021). Socioeconomic and patient factors such as behavior, demographic characteristics, and attitudes can lead to unfavorable MDR-TB treatment outcomes. Also, cases of unfavorable treatment outcomes may give rise to further transmission of MDR-TB, risking the development of extensive drug resistance (De Vries et al., 2017).
In the U.S., there is already political and regulatory support for the fight against MDR-TB. In collaboration with the world health organization (WHO), there has been a political will to enhance policy community cohesion (Sakamoto et al., 2019). Also, community health workers, including public health nurses, play a crucial role in reducing the MDR-TB burden globally. The contribution of public health workers in disease detection and management through regulation has resulted in a rapid decline in MDR-TB prevalence (Sakamoto et al., 2019; Nash et al., 2021).
Impact of the Current Health Care Legislation on the NAP Initiative
The current health care legislation necessitates the need for TB surveillance, reporting, and vaccination (Global Health Agency, 2021). The U.S. government’s global TB efforts have increased through funding having legal support. In 2021, for instance, the U.S government released 332 million dollars to enhance the global fight against TB. Currently, USAID serves as the lead implementing agency for the U.S. global TB efforts, reaching more than 50 countries worldwide (Global Health Agency, 2021). Additionally, the current health care legislation has enhanced bilateral TB programs in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia to accelerate detection, treatment, and scale-up prevention of MDR-TB (Global Health Agency, 2021). Thus, such U.S. involvement through regulation can enhance the fight against MDR-TB.
Conclusion
The U.S. government initiated the NAP program in the global effort to fight MDR-TB. Cultural and ethical issues such as patient behaviors and discrimination should be considered for the effective implementation of the NAP initiative. Also, the political and legal support of the MDR-TB initiative has enhanced its implementation through increased funding. Lastly, the current health care legislation on TB surveillance, testing, and vaccination has resulted in the decline of MDR-TB cases worldwide.
References
De Vries, G., Tsolova, S., Anderson, L. F., Gebhard, A. C., Heldal, E., Hollo, V., … & Van der Werf, M. J. (2017). Health system factors influencing the management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in four European Union countries-learning from country experiences. Bio-Med Central Public Health, 17(1), 1-12. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186%2Fs12889-017-4216-9
Global Health Agency (2021). The U.S. government and global tuberculosis efforts. https://www.kff.org/global-health-policy/fact-sheet/the-u-s-government-and-global-tuberculosis-efforts/
Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J. & Oglesby, W. H. (2021). Policy and advocacy. In population health: Creating a culture of wellness (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Sakamoto, H., Lee, S., Ishizuka, A., Hinoshita, E., Hori, H., Ishibashi, N., … & Shibuya, K. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for eliminating tuberculosis–Leveraging political momentum of the UN high-level meeting on tuberculosis. Bio-Med Central Public Health, 19(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6399-8
The United States Agency for International Development (2020). National action plan for combating multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. https://www.usaid.gov/global-health/health-areas/tuberculosis/national-action-plan-combating-mdr-tb
Sample Answer 2 for NURS 8310 Week 11 Discussion 2 Factors That Impact Population Health
Public Health Initiative
One of the public health initiatives by the Department of Public Health and Environment in Colorado is the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Reduction Roadmap. The project is aimed at reducing pollution. The state’s science-based climate targets of 26% by 2025, 50% by 2030, and 90% by 2050 are the goal (www.cdphe.colorado.gov ). Some of the strategies that will be used to achieve this are through a move towards zero-emission vehicles, reducing methane pollution, and working closely with oil and gas companies to reduce their carbon footprint. This is such a big deal from an epidemiology standpoint because of the negative impacts on individuals’ health who suffer from chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. We need to ensure an environment that facilitates normal daily living for these individuals with fewer flare-ups. We also need to consider the negative effects of those without COPD who can develop diseases like cancer from secondhand exposure. Pollution leads to climate change, climate change leads to wildfires, and fires lead to respiratory illnesses and diseases.
Culture legal and ethical considerations
One of the cultural considerations of this is the population who live in Colorado. Colorado is home to ranchers and oil and gas company residents. Especially in the Front Range areas. Oil and gas companies bring in lots of revenue to the state and ranchers in Colorado are in the top 10 for states with the most cattle. Trying to reduce oil and gas production or transition to plant-based meat analogues would not be very popular. The regulatory issues surrounding oil and gas have to do with how much a state allows an oil and gas company to do in their state. In Colorado, there is always controversy about oil and gas related to gas flaring, fracking, and the effects of oil on wildlife (www.epe.gov). Individuals who want to preserve natural lands and also influence global warming are in direct conflict or those who support the oil and gas industry. Ranching raises a different concern. According to the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO, 2020), livestock produce 14.5% of global greenhouse emissions. Generations of family businesses are based on ranching. Developing strategies to assist in less methane production from cows will be essential to the survival of that career path. Lobbyists and lawmakers will be intimately involved in passing bills that assist in cleaner air quality in Colorado in the future. The health of our vulnerable population and airway compromised patients need advocacy. If something does not change then epidemiologists will be faced with an epidemic of large proportion related to COPD and cancers associated with the lungs.
References:
Department of Public Health and Environment Colorado. (2022). GHG Pollution Reduction Roadmap. https://energyoffice.colorado.gov/climate-energy/ghg-pollution-reduction-roadmap
Environmental Protection Agency. (2012). Reducing Air Pollution from the Oil and Gas Industry
https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-09/documents/20120417presentation.pdf
(PDF) tackling climate change through livestock a global … (n.d.). Retrieved January 30, 2022, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289509969_Tackling_climate_change_through_livestock_A_global_assessment_of_emissions_and_mitigation_opportunities