NURS 8310 Week 8 Meta-Analyses
Walden University NURS 8310 Week 8 Meta-Analyses-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 8310 Week 8 Meta-Analyses assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8310 Week 8 Meta-Analyses
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 8310 Week 8 Meta-Analyses depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8310 Week 8 Meta-Analyses
The introduction for the Walden University NURS 8310 Week 8 Meta-Analyses is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for NURS 8310 Week 8 Meta-Analyses
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 8310 Week 8 Meta-Analyses assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 8310 Week 8 Meta-Analyses
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS 8310 Week 8 Meta-Analyses
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8310 Week 8 Meta-Analyses assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NURS 8310 Week 8 Meta-Analyses
Meta-analysis is a rigorous study design in epidemiology that systematically evaluates prior research findings to draw comprehensive conclusions (Ferreira et al., 2022). This research is grounded in rigorous, controlled clinical trials, allowing for more accurate assessments of treatment effectiveness and the impact of risk factors on disease. The Cochrane Collaboration has significantly contributed to the field by developing literature search protocols and new analytic and diagnostic methods (Vera, 2020). Meta-analyses have the potential to enhance precision, provide answers to questions, resolve controversies, and generate fresh hypotheses. This paper analyzes a meta-analysis article and explores the implications of this research design for nursing practice.
Selected Article
Lake, E. T., Sanders, J., Duan, R., Riman, K. A., Schoenauer, K. M., & Chen, Y. (2019). A Meta-Analysis of the associations between hospital nurse work environment and four sets of outcomes. Medical Care, 57(5), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000001109
A meta-analysis was carried out by Lake et al. (2019) to evaluate the relationship between the work environment for nurses and their jobs and health outcomes. The researchers examined a subset of 17 articles from a larger pool of 308 articles published until September 2018. The primary areas of interest were patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, safety and quality ratings, and nurse job outcomes. The results showed that all outcome categories and the work environment had substantial and statistically significant connections. Better work environments were associated with lower odds of poor patient outcomes, inadequate safety or quality ratings, and adverse nurse outcomes. Conversely, they were associated with an increased likelihood of patient satisfaction. The study found that it is crucial to prioritize the nurse work environment to enhance healthcare quality, safety, and the well-being of patients and clinicians.
Meta-Analysis Research
For a systematic review to exist, a meta-analysis must be performed as a statistical summary of its findings (Ng, 2020). It is typically performed once the review has been finalized, and a well-executed systematic review is essential for conducting a meta-analysis. All studies included in the meta-analysis must have consistent population, intervention, and comparison criteria. Additionally, the assessed measure or outcome should be measured uniformly and at consistent time intervals. The meta-analysis can maintain its validity and reliability by adhering to rigorous standards.
In their meta-analysis, Lake et al. (2019) utilized the PES-NWI to locate empirical studies about nurse practice environment scales. The researchers thoroughly searched electronic databases, such as PubMed and CINAHL, to identify relevant studies that utilized the PES-NWI. The studies were carefully reviewed to ensure they utilized PES-NWI data. Additionally, the strength and quality of the evidence were assessed using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-based Practice Rating Scale.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
The inclusion and exclusion criteria Lake et al. (2019) set were clearly defined. The study removed any duplicate entries and carefully examined the use of data from the PES-NWI composite. The main factor considered was using the PES-NWI data separately to forecast hospital health or job results. The specification of the independent variable was required from the PES-NWI composite, while the article needed to present odds ratios (ORs) or beta coefficients with SEs or confidence intervals (CIs) derived from a regression model. To be eligible for inclusion, it was necessary to have at least three observations for each variable to carry out a meta-analysis. The evidence’s strength and quality were evaluated using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-based Practice Rating Scale. The final selection included all nonoverlapping samples for each variable, requiring a minimum of 3 observations to estimate a model.
I support the research approach taken by Lake et al. (2019) as they utilized the PES-NWI and the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-based Practice Rating Scale to assess pertinent articles and gather data thoroughly. The study analyzed the adjusted odds of various outcomes, including patient satisfaction, work results for nurses, outcomes based on patient health records, and evaluations of quality and safety. In 16 papers, the PES-NWI was categorized as a variable, while one study treated it as a standardized continuous variable. The study also provided additional pertinent details such as the country where the data was collected, the size of the sample, the year when the nurse survey data was generated, and the variables included in the multivariate models.
Research Conclusion
A comprehensive analysis of sixteen years of evidence was conducted by Lake et al. (2019), which underscored the robust correlation between the work environment of nurses and both health and job outcomes. I wholeheartedly concur with the researchers’ conclusion, given that their evidence substantiates the work environment’s substantial influence on the welfare of healthcare providers and patients alike. Therefore, healthcare administrators should allocate their attention and resources towards enhancing the work environment, as it offers a substantial opportunity for progress (Niskala et al., 2020).
Implications to Nursing Practice
Lake et al. (2019) discovered strong connections between the work environment and various outcomes, indicating that improved settings may decrease adverse nurse outcomes, low safety ratings, and unfavorable patient outcomes while enhancing patient satisfaction. An optimal nursing work environment is essential for enhancing healthcare quality, safety, and the well-being of patients and clinicians. Nurses encounter physical, mental, emotional, and ethical problems, such as handling intricate patients, addressing social and moral dilemmas, and tackling health disparities (Chen & Meier, 2021). The pressures impact their health, increasing the likelihood of medical mistakes and jeopardizing patient safety. Nurses must prioritize their well-being to effectively tackle socioeconomic determinants of health and promote health and healthcare fairness. All stakeholders, including policymakers, employers, nursing schools, nurse leaders, professional organizations, and nurses, are responsible for safeguarding the welfare of the nursing workforce.
References
Chen, C., & Meier, S. T. (2021). Burnout and depression in nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 124, 104099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104099
Ferreira, R., Sousa, L., Nobre, C., Nunes, A. C., Fonseca, C., Ferreira, Ó., & Baixinho, C. L. (2022). The development of research skills in Nursing Postgraduate training. Education Sciences (Basel), 12(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020078
Lake, E. T., Sanders, J., Duan, R., Riman, K. A., Schoenauer, K. M., & Chen, Y. (2019). A Meta-Analysis of the associations between hospital nurse work environment and four sets of outcomes. Medical Care, 57(5), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000001109
Ng, L. K. (2020). The perceived importance of soft (service) skills in nursing care: A research study. Nurse Education Today, p. 85, 104302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104302
Niskala, J., Kanste, O., Tomietto, M., Miettunen, J., Tuomikoski, A., Kyngäs, H., & Mikkonen, K. (2020). Interventions to improve nurses’ job satisfaction: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(7), 1498–1508. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14342
Vera, F. (2020). Research skills in nursing undergraduate students: A case study at a Chilean private university. OSJ. Open Science Journal, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.23954/osj.v5i3.2487