NURS 8502 Week 5 Discussion Exploration of Sources of Evidence

Walden University NURS 8502 Week 5 Discussion Exploration of Sources of Evidence-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 8502 Week 5 Discussion Exploration of Sources of Evidence assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8502 Week 5 Discussion Exploration of Sources of Evidence                           

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 8502 Week 5 Discussion Exploration of Sources of Evidence depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8502 Week 5 Discussion Exploration of Sources of Evidence                         

The introduction for the Walden University NURS 8502 Week 5 Discussion Exploration of Sources of Evidence is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NURS 8502 Week 5 Discussion Exploration of Sources of Evidence                         

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 8502 Week 5 Discussion Exploration of Sources of Evidence assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 8502 Week 5 Discussion Exploration of Sources of Evidence                         

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NURS 8502 Week 5 Discussion Exploration of Sources of Evidence                           

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8502 Week 5 Discussion Exploration of Sources of Evidence assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NURS 8502 Week 5 Discussion Exploration of Sources of Evidence

In nursing practice, the provision of healthcare is based on evidence-based practice. By description, evidence-based practice (EBP) is a problem-solving strategy to deliver health care that incorporates the best evidence from studies and patient care data. Applying evidence-based practice (EBP) also considers the clinician’s expertise, patient preferences, and values.   In my practice problem identified in the week one discussion, I have pointed out that pressure ulcers among those in assisted living facility workshops are a problem. The data indicates that over 3 million adults worldwide are affected by pressure ulcers (Guzman, McClanahan & Vaughn, 2018). There are various interventions have been proposed to help curb pressure ulcers. However, there is still a gap to support for the implementation of the proposed interventions. Consequently, the proposed solutions still need to be backed up by the sources of pieces of evidence. In this discussion, I will explore multiple sources of evidence for the above practice problem.

Sources of Evidence

To support the evidence of interventions to reduce pressure ulcers, I would employ several sources of evidence to support the practice. The first source I would use is peer-reviewed journal articles. Peer-reviewed journal articles are scholarly sources written by experts in a particular field and by several other experts before the article is published in the journal, thus ensuring the article’s quality (Neilson, 2021). The second source I would consider for the identified practice problem is journals that contain articles written by professionals and academics. Examples of such journals include the American Journal of Critical Care, the American Journal of Public Health, and the Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing.

The third source I would use is scientific and reputable databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, and Clinical Key. These databases provide indexing for consumer health, nursing, allied health, and biomedical journals. These databases also include standards of practice that would support the practice problem identified. The fourth source of evidence I would include is the organizations that produce practice guidelines. Example of these organizations is the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the American College of Physicians are made up of several institutes that conduct and support medical research and thus, guarantee the quality of the evidence (Jones, Brennan & Davis, 2020).

The Impact of not Including Resources

Failure to include evidence from scholarly articles means that the evidence is less likely to be scientifically valid in terms of providing reasonable conclusions. Databases such as PubMed provide supportive resources, including biomedical and life sciences literature, with the key objective of improving health–both globally and personally. These databased provide huge,  up to date, reliable and authoritative resources, and thus, failure to include resources  would mean insufficient evidence to support the practice problem (Hickey & Giardino, 2021)

Overall, deciding which sources of evidence to use for a practice problem depends on various factors. These factors include accessibility of the resource, search, and time available. However, it is important to use reliable sources (Hickey & Giardino, 2021). Such sources are not limited to selected websites and databases, peer-reviewed journal articles, and organizations that publish guidelines.

References

Guzman, J. L., McClanahan, R., & Vaughn, S. (2018). Development of guidelines for pressure ulcer prevention. Wounds International, 9, 4, 34-38.

Hickey, J. V., & Giardino, E. R. (Eds.). (2021). Evaluation of quality in health care for DNPs (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing.

Jones, E. P., Brennan, E. A., & Davis, A. (2020). Evaluation of literature searching and article selection skills of an evidence-based practice team. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 108(3), 487–493.

Neilson, C. J. (2021). Adoption of peer review of literature search strategies in knowledge synthesis from 2009 to 2018: An overview. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 38, 3, 160-171.

Sample Answer 2 for NURS 8502 Week 5 Discussion Exploration of Sources of Evidence

I did a stakeholder analysis and organizational readiness to change form for this practice problem. A unique way to gather evidence was through social media. On Facebook, I joined the doctoral peer mentoring group, and the posts I saw there led me to look at a repository of DNP projects. The doctoral project repository had a search bar that only showed one result on the topic I was looking at exploring, but it was a starting point for me. I believe that I do not have enough time in the day to reinvent the wheel, so I thought exploring completed projects would allow me to understand what was included in completing a project of this scope with the time I have available. Having a formula in place that has already been tested will guide me to complete the project.

Google scholar (2022) was another database that I had forgotten about but was reminded about in this course. I like google scholar because it has meta-analysis, peer-reviewed, scientific research that encompasses the content of many research areas. The fact that I could search for data that is up to date within the past few years was a bonus.

The last source of evidence I looked at was exploring the website for the American sleep association. The American sleep association (2022) has information on screening processes for specific sleep disorders. That will benefit the practice as I will be using relevant content that will hopefully enhance the learner’s experience and boost the learner’s confidence in independently implementing the screenings post-project.

Flaws of noninclusion

The impact of not including information from the national and social resources that are available could impact my research by providing irrelevant data or have me looking through overwhelming content. If I did not explore all the resources available, I might be missing out on an intervention that could make a difference in the educational change that I would like to pursue the practice problem. I look forward to reading classmates’ thought processes on how they collect evidence to grow as a scholar that is outside of the nursing journal realm.

References

American Sleep Association: Insomnia, Sleep Apnea & Snoring. (2022)

https://www.sleepassociation.org

Doctoral Project Repository- Doctors of Nursing Practice, Inc. and the DNP online community. www.doctorsofnursingpractice.org/project-repository/

Google Scholar.(2022) https://scholar.google.com

NURS 8502 Week 5 Assignment Assignment 4 Identify Search Strategy Sample

Assignment 4: Identify Search Strategy 

After identifying practice problems, nurses need evidence to support practice change. Such evidence is sourced from scientific, scholarly literature, primarily from peer-reviewed journal articles. Sources should also be current to be relevant in practice change and health practice. To get adequate and appropriate evidence, change proponents should have a search strategy. The purpose of this paper is to explain the search strategy, rationale, and decision-making as a leader. 

The Search Strategy 

Search strategies vary depending on the clinical question. In this case, the entire process will start with formulating a clinical question through the PICOT framework. The problem is nursing shortage, and the suggested interventions include building nurse resilience and training nurses to recognize and report burnout. Resilience building is a coping strategy to help nurses cope with stressful work environments (Janzarik et al., 2022). The expected outcome is high nurse retention, which is critical in preventing the organization spend massive resources on recruiting and training new staff (Dewanto & Wardhani, 2018). The problem, intervention, and the expected outcome will form the phrases that will help search peer-reviewed articles with adequate, current, and relevant information. Hence, the search will be primarily through phrasal search. To get the desired articles, phrases will be combined with the relevant Boolean articles. For instance, “and” is used to find articles that mention both of the searched topics (University of Leeds, 2022). It will help get the articles needed for evidence to guide practice change. 

Reasons for Selection and Benefits to the Identified Problem 

Evidence for practice change should be extensive. Searching using phrases is a highly effective strategy since it will provide articles exploring the problem from different dimensions and relevant solutions. To address the nursing shortage, scholarly articles that explore the suitability of the proposed interventions are the most appropriate. As a result, using phrases in the PICOT will help get evidence for the nursing shortage from both the problem and solution dimensions. 

Decision-Making as a Leader 

Nurses play a critical role in leading practice change. As a leader, it is crucial to explore a practice problem, including causes, manifestations, and effects, before proposing evidence-based interventions. I selected searching through phrases since it will provide adequate information to support practice change. As leaders, nurses should not merely identify solutions. Instead, they should find the best based on evidence hence the search strategy. 

Conclusion 

Nurses play a critical role in identifying practice problems and recommending evidence-based solutions. Nursing shortage is a severe problem that hampers care quality and patient safety. It is also a leading cause of nurse turnover. Evidence to address nursing shortage should be sourced from current, scholarly sources. To get appropriate literature, a search strategy is important. The entire process should start with formulating a PICOT question to guide the search process through phrases. The search phrases will be combined using appropriate Boolean articles to get adequate and appropriate information. 

References 

Dewanto, A., & Wardhani, V. (2018). Nurse turnover and perceived causes and consequences: a preliminary study at private hospitals in Indonesia. BMC Nursing, 17(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-018-0317-8 

Janzarik, G., Wollschläger, D., Wessa, M., & Lieb, K. (2022). A group intervention to promote resilience in nursing professionals: a randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), 649. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020649 

University of Leeds. (2022). Literature searching explained. https://library.leeds.ac.uk/info/1404/literature_searching/14/literature_searching_explained/4