NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
Capella University NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal – Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Capella University NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Capella University NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
The introduction for the Capella University NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NURS-FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
Medication errors are prevalent in the healthcare system. The adverse events occur when prescribing drugs, feeding information into a computer system, preparing and dispensing drugs, or giving the drug to a patient (Tong et al., 2017). The current paper covers a proposal to reduce medication errors within general medical units at the Optimal Health Center. The proposed solution is an interdisciplinary medication-reconciliation intervention to curtail medical errors between preadmission, admission, and patient discharge. The intervention will use a Web application called preadmission medication list (PAML) builder and a processes redesign that will restructure the way physicians, nurses, and pharmacists feed patient medication notes into charts.
Objective
The objective of the undertaking is to adopt a medication reconciliation intervention in the medical-surgical ward to reduce medication errors and promote patient safety. The objective aligns with the hospital’s goal of providing safe, secure, and high-quality medical care. Medication reconciliation will ensure that the team creates an accurate list possible of all medications a patient will be taken and compare it against the physician admission, transfer, or discharge orders (Liu et al., 2019). The process will also ensure that a patient gets correct medications at all transition points within the ward.
Questions and Predictions
- What are the challenges of obtaining an accurate medication list?
A challenge that may arise is incomplete patient medication histories. The team will have to be vigilant to ensure that medication histories are complete to get accurate information about patient medication.
- What is the impact of an inaccurate medication list?
Although a medication error may have no notable effects, an inaccurate, medication list may result in severe patient injury or death. Measures are essential to enhance accuracy and reconciliation is an effective approach.
- Which healthcare disciplines are involved in obtaining patient medication lists?
The disciplines that handle medication lists are physicians, nursing, and pharmacy. The planned interdisciplinary team will comprise physicians, nurses, and pharmacists.
- What is the goal of performing an accurate medication reconciliation?
Accurate medication reconciliation aids in the reduction of negative patient outcomes linked to medication errors.
- How much workload will the new intervention add to the interdisciplinary team?
The workload will increase by 5to10% but as the team acclimatizes with the reconciliation process, they will be able to perform their duties efficiently.
ALSO READ:
NURS FPX4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation
Change Theory and Leadership Strategy
Change Theory
The program will follow the Lippits Seven-Step Change Theory. The initial steps will be diagnosing medical reconciliation issues and assessing motivation and capacity for change (Grol & Wensing, 2020). The steps will improve the readiness and willingness of the hospital to change. It will also make the interdisciplinary team aware of the need for change and improve their motivation for adopting the new medical reconciliation intervention. After sensitization, the hospital systems’ problem will be diagnosed by the whole team and alternative routes established. At this juncture, the team will roll out the reconciliation program as they transform intentions into actual efforts. After rolling out the program, the evaluation will be done to stabilize it as the program gets adopted across different hospital wards and the relationship terminated.
Leadership Strategy
The hospital requires strong leadership to adopt measures that will reduce medication errors and enhance interdisciplinary teams. A leadership strategy that addresses the issue at hand is a patient-centered approach to medication errors. It will ensure that services are tailored to suit individual patient wants and needs. It will help the team treat patients with dignity, compassion, and respect as well as offer coordinated care, support, and treatment (Lee et al., 2018). Providers will record patient medication-related issues in their care plan and share them with other caregivers to facilitate a holistic view of the patient and limit the occurrence of medication errors.
Team Collaboration Strategy
The program will use a Web application called preadmission medication list (PAML) builder and a processes redesign. On admission, the ordering physician will take a comprehensive medication history, input the first PAML, and develop a strategic plan for the patient’s medication during hospitalization. The nurse will then assess the plan and confirm its accuracy and inform the physicians of any errors. The pharmacists will reconcile the PAML in line with the physician’s admission orders and check for errors. Once the patient is admitted, the physician, nurse, and pharmacists will work together as a team to update the orders as needed. During discharge, the physician, nurse, and pharmacist will review the PAML and current medications and come up with a set of discharge orders. To evaluate the impact of the program, an independent pharmacist will take “gold standard” medication histories and compare the results with the PAML and the admission and discharge orders. The pharmacist will then seek answers for any discrepancies found. Lastly, two blinded physician adjudicators will evaluate the errors and potential for harm.
The team will optimize their success through a collaborative culture. They will have to overlook their failures and achievements, level of training and scope of expertise, and work jointly. In the current project, the roles will be clear and based on team members’ strengths to ensure that any medication issues that arise can be resolved (Morley & Cashell, 2017). The interdisciplinary team handling the project should also understand the “big picture” to enhance their bond and make the daily work easier. Trust and open communication are also essential. Trust will allow the team members to follow the goals outlined while open communication will facilitate positive feedback and make the team feel they can communicate freely. In adopting these collaborative measures, the team will be able to discuss patients’ concerns on medications and clarify discrepancies, utilize the prescription databases, work with IT professionals to develop technological solutions, research best practices, and collaborate well.
Required Organizational Resources
The program introduces a preadmission medication list builder. As indicated above, five staff will be in charge of the program. The staff are a physician, nurse, and pharmacist. An independent pharmacist and two blinded physician adjudicators are also needed for the evaluation of the program. A PAML builder is needed for the success of the program as well as portable tablets for the involved staff to make it easy for them to reconcile medication. The PAML builder will be embedded in the existing electronic health record system. Installing, training, and aligning the PAML with the clinical workflow will cost $500,000. Access to the data in the ward will be free but the involved staff will be compensated at $300,000. The overall financial budget should be $800,000 to cover staff time, resource acquisition, and resource use. The project is expected to reduce readmission rates and adverse events. Specifically, it should reduce the Ades by 75% per year. Current ADEs stands at 543 and should reduce to 136. Each averted drug event is expected to cost about $4000 which will save a total of $1.6million annually (Manias, 2018). The hospital expects a similar loss if it fails to adopt the current project.
References
Grol, R., & Wensing, M. (2020). Effective implementation of change in healthcare: a systematic approach. Improving Patient Care: The implementation of change in health care, 45-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119488620.ch3
Lee, J. L., Dy, S. M., Gurses, A. P., Kim, J. M., Suarez-Cuervo, C., Berger, Z. D., … & Xiao, Y. (2018). Towards a more patient-centered approach to medication safety. Journal of Patient Experience, 5(2), 83-87. doi: 10.1177/2374373517727532
Liu, V. C., Mohammad, I., Deol, B. B., Balarezo, A., Deng, L., & Garwood, C. L. (2019). Post-discharge medication reconciliation: Reduction in readmissions in a geriatric primary care clinic. Journal of aging and health, 31(10), 1790-1805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264318795571
Manias, E. (2018). Effects of interdisciplinary collaboration in hospitals on medication errors: an integrative review. Expert opinion on drug safety, 17(3), 259-275. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2018.1424830
Morley, L., & Cashell, A. (2017). Collaboration in health care. Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences, 48(2), 207-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2017.02.071
Tong, E. Y., Roman, C. P., Mitra, B., Yip, G. S., Gibbs, H., Newnham, H. H., … & Dooley, M. J. (2017). Reducing medication errors in hospital discharge summaries: a randomized controlled trial. Medical Journal of Australia, 206(1), 36-39. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00628
References
Grol, R., & Wensing, M. (2020). Effective implementation of change in healthcare: a systematic approach. Improving Patient Care: The implementation of change in health care, 45-71.
Lee, J. L., Dy, S. M., Gurses, A. P., Kim, J. M., Suarez-Cuervo, C., Berger, Z. D., … & Xiao, Y. (2018). Towards a more patient-centered approach to medication safety. Journal of Patient Experience, 5(2), 83-87.
Manias, E. (2018). Effects of interdisciplinary collaboration in hospitals on medication errors: an integrative review. Expert opinion on drug safety, 17(3), 259-275.
Morley, L., & Cashell, A. (2017). Collaboration in health care. Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences, 48(2), 207-216.