NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

Capella University NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Capella University  NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Capella University  NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for  NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources 

The introduction for the Capella University  NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources  is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for  NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

After the introduction, move into the main part of the  NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for  NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources 

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for  NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources 

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the  NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

Ensuring the investigated information’s accuracy, currency, and reliability is essential in nursing research. The healthcare landscape undergoes continuous changes with the emergence of new research and evidence. When nurses encounter an unfamiliar diagnosis or condition, they must collect the requisite information to ensure the patient’s safe treatment (Nazanin Alipourfard et al., 2021). It is crucial to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources to optimize patient outcomes. The provision of high-quality evidence is essential and can be achieved through the utilization of reliable information resources. A nurse at Vila Health encounters a patient with preeclampsia, a diagnosis that she is unfamiliar with. This paper aims to elucidate the criteria for assessing the credibility of journal articles and websites on preeclampsia.

Also Read

BHA-FPX4006 Assessment 1: Compliance Program Implementation and Ethical Decision Making

Preeclampsia

The presence of established standards for the management of preeclampsia in hospitals is not universal. According to recent findings by the World Health Organization (WHO), preeclampsia is estimated to be responsible for around 70,000 maternal fatalities yearly worldwide (EL sebaey Soliman et al., 2021). Preeclampsia and high blood pressure are significant medical concerns that need prompt and proper intervention. Preeclampsia may be characterized by systolic blood pressure (SBP) equal to or more than 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) equal to or greater than 90 mmHg, accompanied by proteinuria, with or without signs or symptoms. Alternatively, preeclampsia may also manifest via the appearance of signs, symptoms, or laboratory abnormalities, even in the absence of proteinuria. Blood pressure control measures are the most effective strategy in mitigating the risk of stroke-related mortality in women diagnosed with preeclampsia. The expeditious initiation of therapy to reduce blood pressure levels can significantly reduce maternal morbidity and fatality rates.

Criteria of Resources

When conducting research, it is essential to identify the most reliable sources of information. Selecting appropriate resources from the vast array of journals and scientific publications available online and in databases can be overwhelming. However, it is essential to prioritize peer-reviewed, relevant, and reliable sources.National organizations, government entities, and medical institutions publish the most reliable sources of evidence (Nazanin Alipourfard et al., 2021). When conducting research, it is crucial to prioritize articles that have undergone peer review in the past five years. Peer review is a widely used approach to guarantee and evaluate the excellence of academic research. When conducting research, it is crucial to utilize a database that facilitates the discovery of relevant articles. Capella University utilizes various search engines, including Summon, PubMed, and Medline.

Analysis of the Credibility and Relevance

Evidence-based practice strives to deliver safe and effective care by identifying hazards and providing current information on treatments and regimens. Numerous studies and research have been conducted to determine the optimal approach to managing patients with preeclampsia. Maternal mortality is the second leading cause of death among women, and implementing evidence-based treatments can reduce the risk or severity of health outcomes for both mothers and newborns (Portney, 2019). Credible and relevant sources will be identified based on the Nursing Research Pyramid. The Pyramid is a hierarchical representation of visual evidence, wherein the credibility of information increases as one moves up from the bottom to the top. Case-control studies, cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, critically appraised articles, critically assessed individuals, and systematic reviews positioned at the apex of the hierarchy represent the most dependable sources.

A study by Alnuaimi et al. (2020) discovered a reputable and relevant source that examined the effects of an interventional program on the knowledge of high-risk preeclampsia among Jordanian women and its impact on pregnancy outcomes. A randomized controlled study was conducted in a publicly funded healthcare facility in Jordan. The findings demonstrated a statistically significant disparity in average scores about knowledge of preeclampsia between the group that received the intervention and the control group after the educational program implementation. The researchers have concluded that implementing a Preeclampsia educational program has positive results in enhancing awareness of preeclampsia and improving specific outcomes related to pregnancy. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that educators in midwifery and nursing focus on providing comprehensive training to midwives and nurses to enhance their effectiveness as healthcare practitioners. 

Evidence-Based Model

Numerous frameworks and models have been devised to augment nurses’ comprehension ofadopting evidence-based practice (EBP). Using frameworks and models is paramount in advancing secure and exemplary nursing practice. The Iowa model will guide the application process to facilitate the incorporation of preeclampsia management ideas into clinical practice (Portney, 2019). The model selection was based on its problem-solving technique, which emphasizesusing well-organized processes to facilitate the effective execution of evidence-based practice. The methodology comprises succinct and lucid stages that assist nurses in discerning concerns and choosing dependable sources to ascertain the suggested alteration. The objective of the approach is to effectively address preeclampsia byidentifying underlying causes, evaluating relevant sources, strategic planning for implementing necessary changes, and promoting long-term sustainability.

Conclusion

Nurses can enhance their support for pre-eclampsia patients by acquiring the skills to find and utilize peer-reviewed information from the past five years, using suitable search engines and databases. Using Evidence-Based Practice models, such as the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice, can assist nurses in providing appropriate care for pre-eclampsia patients. A comprehensive care plan can be achieved for the patient by utilizing these tools for success.

References

Alnuaimi, K., Abuidhail, J., & Ismail, H. (2020). The effects of an educational program about preeclampsia on women’s awareness: a randomized control trial. International Nursing Review, 67(4), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12626

EL sebaey Soliman, D., Abd El hakeem Hasneen, S., Ouda AbdElmoniem, S., & Kamal Ali, F. (2021). Assessment of Nurse’s Knowledge and Practices Regarding The Use of Evidence-based for Pregnant Women with Pre-eclampsia. Journal of Nursing Science Benha University, 2(2), 498–513. https://doi.org/10.21608/jnsbu.2021.194587

Nazanin Alipourfard, Arendt, B., Benjamin, D. J., Noam Benkler, Bishop, M., Burstein, M., Bush, M., Caverlee, J., Chen, Y.-L., & Clark, C. G. (2021). Systematizing Confidence in Open Research and Evidence (SCORE). SocArXiv (OSF Preprints). https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/46mnb

Portney, L. G. (2019). Foundations of Clinical Research: applications to practice. (4th ed.). F.A. Davis Company.

Sample Answer 2 for NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

Healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, ought to emphasize the credibility and quality of sources of information when implementing evidence-based practice to enhance patient care quality and safety (Zheng et al., 2023). It is crucial to prioritize research supported by scholarly publications over internet-based sources, once the gravity of the healthcare issue has been established. This paper aims to emphasize the utilization of credible journal articles to support evidence-based practice in the appropriate management of stroke in the emergency department.

Quality or Safety Issue

Stroke is a critical medical condition associated with a mortality rate that surpasses that of many types of cancer. According to Zheng et al. (2023), it is the second leading cause of mortality in developed nations and the primary cause of significant and enduring disability among adults. Besides affecting patients and their families, there are significant economic repercussions. Moreover, the prevalence of stroke is rising due to the aging of populations, posing a significant challenge for health planners. According to Liu et al. (2022), using an evidence-based guideline may optimize post-stroke patient outcomes and emergency nursing treatment for acute stroke patients. Since the Emergency Department is where the continuum of stroke treatment begins, multidisciplinary standards for acute stroke therapy must include evidence-based urgent nursing care recommendations (Rababah et al., 2021).

Criteria for Determining Credibility of Resources

Certain criteria should be taken into account while assessing the reliability of resources. The Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose (CRAAP) test allows healthcare providers to assess the purpose, authority, relevance, accuracy, and currency of a source. First, a source’s currency should be considered while evaluating its trustworthiness. The currency test ensures that the reference is up-to-date and has been used within the last five years. Considering the author’s qualifications, publication date, and indexing when analyzing a journal or website’s reliability. Hence each of the sources I looked at not only did well on the CRAAP tests but also addressed issues that were pertinent to the safety concerns I had (Rababah et al., 2021). 

Analysis of the Credibility and Relevance of the Evidence and Resources

Middleton et al. (2019) conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of an intervention aimed at enhancing triage, therapy, and transfer processes for individuals with acute stroke in the emergency department. This study is current and relevant to the research topic, as it is authored by medical professionals who provide credibility to the information presented. The purpose statement is also clearly defined. In their study, Liu et al. (2022) conducted a quality improvement project to assess the efficacy of a standard care bundle intervention in preventing stroke-associated pneumonia. This study is also current and relevant to the research topic, as it is authored by medical professionals who provide credibility to the information presented. The purpose statement is also clearly defined.

Zheng et al. (2023) used the acute ischemic stroke-associated pneumonia scoring scale in quasi-intervention pilot research to examine the effects of nurse-led hierarchical management care on patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study is also current and relevant to the research topic, as it is authored by medical professionals who provide credibility to the information presented. The purpose statement is also clearly defined. In a recent research, Rababah et al. (2021) evaluated the effect of an evidence-based training program on healthcare workers’ general knowledge of stroke by using a randomized block design with a post-test-only approach. Rababah et al. (2021) provided the most valuable evidence among the four sources, suggesting that Stroke education should be a mandatory component of professional development for all healthcare professionals in emergency settings.

Evidence-Based Model

            Several models and frameworks have been created to help nurses better understand the process of implementing evidence-based practice. Frameworks and models are essential in facilitating the promotion of safe and outstanding nursing practice. The EBP implementation process will be guided by the Iowa model, which will facilitate the incorporation of principles related to stroke prevention and treatment into real clinical practice within the emergency department. The model was chosen for its problem-solving approach that emphasizes structured procedures to facilitate the effective implementation of evidence-based practice (Rababah et al., 2021). The method is broken down into manageable steps that help nurses see problems and choose trustworthy sources to figure out the best course of action. The model’s objective is to effectively address stroke by identifying its causes, evaluating various sources, planning the execution of necessary changes, and promoting long-term sustainability.

Conclusion

Stroke is a global issue that necessitates an increased number of skilled healthcare professionals and enhanced collaboration among them. Improving healthcare providers’ understanding and proficiency in stroke management is crucial in mitigating the significant consequences of stroke on individuals, their families, and the healthcare system. Healthcare providers should have access to evidence-based resources and ongoing educational opportunities for acute stroke care.        

References

Liu, Z.-Y., Wei, L., Ye, R.-C., Chen, J., Nie, D., Zhang, G., & Zhang, X.-P. (2022). Reducing the incidence of stroke-associated pneumonia: an evidence-based practice. BMC Neurology, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02826-8

Middleton, S., Dale, S., Cheung, N. W., Cadilhac, D. A., Grimshaw, J. M., Levi, C., McInnes, E., Considine, J., McElduff, P., Gerraty, R., Craig, L. E., Schadewaldt, V., Fitzgerald, M., Quinn, C., Cadigan, G., Denisenko, S., Longworth, M., Ward, J., D’Este, C., & Grimley, R. (2019). Nurse-initiated acute Stroke Care in Emergency Departments. Stroke, 50(6), 1346–1355. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.118.020701

Rababah, J. A., Al-Hammouri, M. M., & AlNsour, E. (2021). Effectiveness of an educational program on improving healthcare providers’ knowledge of acute stroke: A randomized block design study. World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 12(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2021.02.002

Zheng, D., Li, S., Ding, Y., Chen, H., Wang, D., Wang, H., Xie, Y., Li, C., & Luo, J. (2023). Effects of nurse-led hierarchical management care on acute stroke patients: A pilot study to promote stroke-associated pneumonia management. Frontiers in Neurology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1121836