NURS-FPX6218 Assessment 1 Proposing Evidence-Based Change

Capella University NURS-FPX6218 Assessment 1 Proposing Evidence-Based Change  – Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Capella University NURS-FPX6218 Assessment 1 Proposing Evidence-Based Change  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS-FPX6218 Assessment 1 Proposing Evidence-Based Change                   

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Capella University NURS-FPX6218 Assessment 1 Proposing Evidence-Based Change  depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS-FPX6218 Assessment 1 Proposing Evidence-Based Change                   

The introduction for the Capella University NURS-FPX6218 Assessment 1 Proposing Evidence-Based Change is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NURS-FPX6218 Assessment 1 Proposing Evidence-Based Change                   

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS-FPX6218 Assessment 1 Proposing Evidence-Based Change assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS-FPX6218 Assessment 1 Proposing Evidence-Based Change                   

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NURS-FPX6218 Assessment 1 Proposing Evidence-Based Change                   

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS-FPX6218 Assessment 1 Proposing Evidence-Based Change  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NURS-FPX6218 Assessment 1 Proposing Evidence-Based Change

Change Proposal Summary Report 

The healthcare model used by a particular country determines how patient care services are offered; hence is a need to have an adequate understanding of the healthcare model applied in the country. Healthcare leaders also need to be familiar with various models and approaches to healthcare to enable them to identify aspects that are effective and that are not effective, hence forming the basis of a proposed change. Such proposals for change can be effected in local or regional healthcare systems to help improve patient outcomes (Smith-Bindman et al.,2019). Therefore, the purpose of this assignment is to propose a change to an aspect of the local or regional healthcare system. In addition, this assignment will focus on a comparative analysis of other non-U.S. healthcare systems focusing on the proposed change.  

Executive Summary 

Proposed Change 

This paper will focus on the U.S. regional healthcare system and, specifically, U.S. healthcare insurance. The USA healthcare insurance has been a topic of debate for several years, with a substantial number of U.S. citizens not having insurance. The implication is that such a large number of individuals, therefore, may find it hard and complicated to access healthcare services due to their inability to pay the needed cash for the healthcare services. As such, they can even succumb to treatable diseases which could have otherwise been treated if they had health insurance. Currently, the U.S. health insurance system is, to a bigger percentage, a private insurance system that is supplemented by Medicaid and Medicare (Berchik et al.,2019). The proposed change is a modification of the current healthcare system to lean towards a universal health insurance coverage system. Therefore, it is expected that such a change would lead to a majority of the population accessing healthcare services. The evidence that supports my position regarding the change is that a substantial number of U.S. citizens remain uninsured even though the Affordable Care Act has improved the number of insured individuals. 

Desired Outcomes 

As pointed out earlier, the proposed change is to reform the USA healthcare insurance system; as such, one of the desirable outcomes of the proposed change is a change to a universal healthcare insurance system to offer coverage for every U.S. citizen so that each and every person can access the patient care services that they may need (Keisler-Starkey & Bunch, 2020). The implication is that every U.S. citizen would be able to access healthcare services since the costs will be reimbursed from the new initiative. The health coverage would include several basic healthcare needs and just leave out a handful of services that can be decided once a suitable framework has been put in place. 

The new proposed universal healthcare insurance system will need to be funded, and so, as part of the proposal, the new system is to be paid for by every USA taxpayer. The payment rates for every those who pay will have to be regulated by suitable enacted laws. For example, every citizen would be required to contribute a part of their income to support the new health insurance system. Appropriate calculation of the percentages would ensure that the payments are fair to support the system as appropriate and that the payment system would ensure that everyone gets healthcare services. 

The proposal of the universal healthcare system can help solve the problem of inadequate access to healthcare services which has seen a substantial number of American citizens not being in a position to obtain the needed healthcare services. Nonetheless, there could be various limiting factors that can hinder the implementation and acceptance of the proposed universal healthcare insurance system. One such factor is the lack of political goodwill from the political class who make and implement laws. There is still a belief that the universal health instance is associated with socialist ideology and should not be accepted in countries that believe in capitalism as the USA. The other potential limiting factor is the strong presence and influence of the private insurance companies that have been engaging in offering coverage and have an influence on politics and government policies. 

Health Care System Comparative Analysis 

It is important for healthcare leaders to have appreciable knowledge regarding the healthcare systems of other nations so that they can make informed decisions regarding any potential changes to the existing system. As such, the Canadian and French healthcare insurance systems have been chosen for the comparative analysis. These two systems have substantial differences from the U.S. healthcare system, which is largely privatized. In the two counties, the health insurance systems put in place by each government offers health insurance coverage to almost all their citizens. Healthcare insurance in both Canada and France advocates for solidarity and equality in how healthcare should be obtained (Ranabhat et al.,2019). The two countries have their universal healthcare system hinged on the respect for human dignity principles. Hence individuals are able to seek healthcare services even though the costs may be high. 

The universal healthcare systems offered by France and Canada give universal coverage to their citizens for better patient outcomes. However, they both have limits on health insurance coverage. For example, the French universal healthcare system excludes dental and eye care from coverage, implying that individuals have to use supplementary insurance when accessing such services (Ranabhat et al.,2019). Comparatively, the Canadian universal healthcare system excludes home healthcare and drugs from the coverage (Smith-Bindman et al.,2019). 

In most cases, the Canadian and French universal healthcare systems have for a long time been viewed as superior to the healthcare system in the U.S. in terms of accessibility and focus on quality care. In various rankings, the two nations have always been ahead of the U.S. healthcare system and health insurance (Smith-Bindman et al.,2019). Such rankings are usually based on various outcomes. As such, the Canadian and French healthcare systems both support more access to healthcare. They also support healthcare equity as compared to the U.S. through the universal healthcare system. 

Also Read

NURS-FPX6218 Assessment 2 Assessing Community Health Care Needs

NURS-FPX6218 Assessment 3 Planning for Community and Organizational Change

The rationale for the Proposed Change 

As discussed earlier, the current U.S. healthcare system is largely private and supported by Medicaid and Medicare. Therefore a proposal is here given for change to a universal healthcare system where American citizens will pay for the insurance using calculated percentages to help support a universal healthcare system (Berchick et al.,2019). Therefore, the rationale for choosing this change or approach is to ensure that all citizens have access to the needed healthcare service. The other rationale is to improve the quality of care offered to patients across all economic classes without the fear of having to pay extremely high bills. 

Financial and Health Implications 

The proposed universal healthcare system has great potential to improve access to care and the quality of patient care services offered to patients. However, the proposal has financial and health implications. One of the financial implications is that the working class paying taxes will have to pay to help the system work. For example, the new system may work as a tax system where individuals contribute depending on the value of their salary in the form of tax revenue (Berchick et al.,2019). The federal and state government will also have to sponsor part of the health care insurance. However, private medical insurance will also need to be in existence to cover the services not covered in the proposed universal healthcare system. In case no change is made, then then a notable number of citizens will continue not having adequate access to the healthcare services as they should. 

Conclusion 

This paper has focused on a change proposal to the U.S. healthcare system, focusing on healthcare insurance.   The nature of the current healthcare care system, where the insurance is largely managed privately, has locked many individuals from getting adequate access to healthcare. As such, a proposed change to a universal healthcare system that will improve access to care and quality of care has been explored. The rationale for change is to increase health insurance coverage for American citizens. Increased insurance coverage may impact the quality of care positively and lead to better population health. 

Appendix 

Table 1: Health Care System Comparative Analysis 

Table directions: 

1. Add the names of the two non-U.S. healthcare systems and the local or regional U.S. healthcare system to the applicable column headings. 

2. In the first column, list each outcome. Add rows to your table as needed. 

3. Add the relevant information pertaining to each outcome for each healthcare system in the second, third, and fourth columns. 

(Papanicolas et al.,2018), (Smith-Bindman et al.,2019) 

References 

Berchick, E. R., Barnett, J. C., & Upton, R. D. (2019). Health Insurance Coverage in the United States, 2018 (pp. 60–267). U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. 

Keisler-Starkey, K., & Bunch, L. N. (2020). Health insurance coverage in the United States: 2019. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. 

Papanicolas, I., Woskie, L. R., & Jha, A. K. (2018). Health care spending in the United States and other high-income countries. Jama, 319(10), 1024-1039. Doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1150 

Ranabhat, C. L., Kim, C. B., Singh, A., Acharya, D., Pathak, K., Sharma, B., & Mishra, S. R. (2019). Challenges and opportunities towards the road of universal health coverage (UHC) in Nepal: a systematic review. Archives of Public Health, 77(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-019-0331-7 

Smith-Bindman, R., Kwan, M. L., Marlow, E. C., Theis, M. K., Bolch, W., Cheng, S. Y., … & Miglioretti, D. L. (2019). Trends in the use of medical imaging in U.S. health care systems and in Ontario, Canada, 2000-2016. Jama, 322(9), 843-856. Doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.11456