PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis

Grand Canyon University PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis – Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University  PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis                             

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University  PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis                             

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University  PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis    is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis                             

After the introduction, move into the main part of the PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis    assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis                             

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis                             

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis

Religion and spirituality are essential factors for most people seeking medical care and interventions. Unfortunately, health care providers and professionals do not consider the religious beliefs and spiritual needs of patients when dealing with complex medical decisions. As professional service providers and experts, health professionals must consider patients’ spiritual needs as such will enable them to develop responsive interventions to deal with any ethical dilemmas (Isaac, Hay, & Lubetkin, 2016). This paper explores the need for a spiritual needs analysis by health care providers based on a case study analysis that involves parental postponement of medically required intervention based on religious beliefs in prayers and miracles. 

Allowing Mike to Continue Making Decisions 

The physician is a professional guided by professional ethics and biomedical ethical principles that include beneficence, autonomy, non-maleficence, and justice. Imperatively, the physician has a responsibility to confer benefits to a patient through better life-saving interventions (Katz & Webb, 2016). Therefore, he should not allow Mike to make decisions that look irrational and detrimental to his son’s health. Although health care professionals should respect parental decisions based on the autonomy principle as they exercise this because James is a minor, the doctor has a legal and ethical responsibility to intervene in the situation that seems harmful to the child (Isaac et al., 2016). Mike is declining and postponing James medically required therapy or intervention because of his faith and religious beliefs. Mike believes that James will be healed through a miracle, as witnessed by one of his church members. Postponing James’ treatment is detrimental to his health and overall quality of life. Mike’s irrational decisions have led to the deterioration of James’ health to the point of having permanent dialysis and need for a kidney transplant. 

Health professionals and providers have a responsibility to protect vulnerable children from potential medical negligence. When health providers encounter minors who face increasing health risks that can be detrimental to their life due to their parent’s inaction or poor decision, they are obligated by law and professional standards to intervene in such situations (Katz & Webb, 2016). again, health care professionals have an ethical responsibility to implement life-saving interventions over parental objection, especially when the minor’s life is in danger. Pediatricians have legal and ethical obligations to make sound decisions and offer care beneficial to pediatric patients. 

Also Read

PHI 413V Applying the Four Principles: Case Study

PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study

PHI-413V Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

Christian Perspective on Health & Sickness, Medical Interventions and What Mike Should Do 

Healing is a core influence on individuals’ health care behaviors and beliefs because of the perceived role of religion and spirituality in health. Christianity is composed of different denominations, and it is challenging to have a common approach to the perception of health and sickness and medical interventions. However, the general perception is that good health is a gift and blessing from God for good deeds and having faith and trust in Him (Isaac et al., 2016). Christians are supposed to live in good health without sickness because the illness signifies the devil taking control of God’s people. Illness or sickness is a reprisal form for sinning or doing bad things that do not please God. Further, Christians perceive sickness as a form of temptation or trials that they encounter to strengthen their faith and increase their belief in God and the healing power that He possesses. For instance, Mike wonders if his faith is not sufficient or if God is punishing him because of his son’s deteriorating condition.  

It is common for religious people to question their faith when faced with sickness and why it occurs. Faith leads to good health, and sickness is a lack of devotion to one’s faith. Christians advance that when one is dedicated to their faith and believe in God, they are healed from illnesses and diseases that may impair their ability to practice their faith (Isaac et al., 2016). For instance, Mike considers his inability to demonstrate faith as the reason his son cannot be healed through prayers.  

Medical intervention is a core aspect of the vocation of those called to care for others. Christians believe that medical interventions are miracles from God through physicians and other health care providers whose vocation is to treat and care for others. Christians should view medical interventions as a way of respecting God’s command for people to seek medical treatment and not a lack of faith. For instance, Jesus in Mathew 9:12 talks about those who are sick seeking medical treatment by looking for a physician as opposed to the healthy who do not need medical care. The implication is that God does not command Christians to keep away from medicine or refuse surgical interventions or procedures. Medical knowledge is a gift from God for people’s benefits. Therefore, Christians should seek medical care and view medical interventions as biblical and a way of honoring God with their bodies and respecting them as God’s dwelling (1 Corinthians 6:19-20). 

As a Christian, Mike needs to allow James to undergo the prescribed medical intervention to believe that God will use the health care professionals to heal his son. By permitting his son to undertake medical treatment, it will imply that God will not heal James by prayers but means that He can and, at times, selects to cure the sick through medical interventions. 

In honoring the beneficence principle, Mike needs to reflect on his son’s condition and understand that a kidney transplant will save his life. Mike should view beneficence as the physician’s conventional purpose as the good Samaritan who comes to help the sick and relives their pain and suffering. Secondly, Mike should honor the principle of non-maleficence by accepting a kidney transplant for his son with the aim of not harming him but healing (Brown, 2019). He needs to uphold his trust in God through the medical procedures, and James will get healed. 

Importance of a Spiritual Needs Assessment 

A spiritual needs assessment or analysis is a critical aspect of effective care delivery. A spiritual assessment allows health care providers to collect information or data on the patient’s wishes and how they base their decisions. Secondly, the assessment will enable the physician and other providers to understand the connection between the treatment interventions and what Mike believes about these approaches to cure his son (Isaac et al., 2016). When a spiritual assessment is done compassionately and culturally sensitively, it can help relieve patients’ suffering.   

In this case, the assessment would help the physician help Mike determine suitable interventions for his son and his family members and others involved in the James’ care by identifying the spiritual needs concerning the medical care. The physician will also know the type of interventions that would be responsive and respectful to the family based on their spiritual beliefs (Evans & Devlin, 2016). A spiritual assessment provides a context for those involved to discuss patient experiences and their families to help them cope with diseases and beliefs that may contradict medical decisions. 

The parameters needed for spiritual assessment of patients or clients include supporting spiritual beliefs, organizational resources, and spiritual activities (Meilaender, 2013). However, the physician can only use a spiritual assessment to identify the spiritual needs, but their role is not to offer spiritual guidance. A physician can refer the patient to a facility’s chaplain or the patient’s religious minister to help them develop an effective spiritual perceptive and address the underlying spiritual needs. 

Conclusion 

James’s case study demonstrates the need for nurse practitioners and other health care providers to develop effective mechanisms that will allow them to seek health care interventions and avoid detrimental outcomes, as evidenced in the case of Mike and his son James. Christians should perceive sickness and health as all-important and require medical interventions. Sickness may have negative connotations but also important in helping one seek medical care.  

References 

Brown, C. G. (2019). Theologies of medicine and miracles. Society, 56(2), 141-146. 

Evans, S., & Devlin, G. (2016). Client-led spiritual interventions: Faith-integrated  

professionalism in the context of a Christian faith-based organization. Australian Social Work, 69(3), 360-372. 

Isaac, K., Hay, J., & Lubetkin, E.  (2016). Incorporating spirituality in primary care. Journal of  

Religion and Health, 55(3), 1065-1077. 

Katz, A. & Webb, S. (2016). Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice.  

Pediatrics, 138(2), e20161485.  

Meilaender, G. (2013). Bioethics: A Primer for Christians (3rd ed.). Grand Rapids.  

Sample Answer 2 for PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs Case Analysis

Patients autonomy allows patients to make own decisions without outside influence. With patient autonomy, the physician or nurse can educate but cannot make decisions for the patient. There are some cases when spiritual beliefs mislead patients to make decisions that are not beneficial (Butts & Rich, 2019). Health providers often face challenging situations when the patient’s spiritual beliefs contradict available medical interventions. To avoid such instances, the care provider should assess the patient’s spiritual needs so as to advise the patient appropriately. This paper uses the presented case study to answer particular questions regarding the patient’s autonomy and spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview.

Physician’s Options Regarding Mike

In the case study, Mike is making decisions that may further cause serious harm to James. Mike is deep into spirituality and believes that God could health James without medical interventions. He has already failed in the first place when James condition got worse. He again wants to do it for the second time and this may put James life in even more risk than before. In that regard, the physician should not allow Mike to continue making decisions that do not help improve James health status. Patient autonomy is a very important aspect of care that should be considered (Butts & Rich, 2019). However, it might be disregarded when the decision made by the patient or the guardian may cause harm. In this case, the patient himself is still a child and may not make sound decisions, therefore, his parents are in a position to make decisions on his behalf (Butts & Rich, 2019). These decisions made by the father have no benefit at all. Stopping mike from making further decisions may conflict with the principle of patient autonomy, however, it would help save the life of the patient. Therefore, it is more ethical and beneficial to disregard the patient’s autonomy, in this particular case, to save the life of the patient.

Christianity’s Perspectives

Christianity has several denominations that teach differently concerning sickness and health. How a Christian will perceive sickness and good health depends on the beliefs that the denominations hold and their teachings. Some Christians believe that sickness is a punishment of sin by God. They think that one only becomes sick after sinning and now God is angry with them (O’brien, 2017). Others believe that God tests the faith of His people and that sickness is one of the ways that God uses to test their faith. For instance, Mike believes that God is testing his faith and he should be strong and trust more in God. As a result, he opted for spiritual healing instead of medical interventions. It is appropriate for Christians to view sickness as disruption of bodily functions that needs the interventions of a medical professional.

A Christian should think positively about medical intervention, as a remedy for sickness. Christians should perceive medical interventions as the act of interceding with the intent of improving the patient’s condition. Additionally, they should think of medication and medical interventions as supplements to spiritual healing that have no harm to Christian beliefs (O’brien, 2017). Mike as a Christian should allow the physician to perform a kidney transplant on James as per the treatment plan. However, he should maintain his spiritual belief as a Christian. He can combine medical treatment with spiritual healing to help James recover. For instance, mike can allow medical organ transplant while praying to God to make the process successful so than James can recover and continue with his normal life.

With regard to the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, Mike can reason up on the best decision to make. The principle of beneficence requires that the action decided upon brings benefits to the parents (Ellis, 2020). It assumes that decisions made within the hospital environment regarding a patient bring a positive impact to the patient. With this idea in mind, Mike can make decisions that only impact the life of James positively. On the other hand, the principle of non-maleficence requires that all decisions made do not cause harm to the patient. In this case, mike can make a decision that is both beneficial and causes no harm to James (Ellis, 2020). If his faith does not bring benefits and only leads to harm, then he should think otherwise. In this case, he should opt for a kidney transplant because that is what will help improve James health status.

Spiritual Needs Assessment

Spiritual assessment is an important aspect of care, especially when such beliefs might influence the type of care provided. According to O’brien (2017). Spiritual assessment is not only meant to determine one’s religion but also to identify spiritual and religious beliefs related to coping with illness. Spiritual needs assessment would enable the physician to help mike make good decisions to help James, after identifying spiritual needs, the physician can incorporate the results of the assessment to the decision making process. The physician will identify spiritual beliefs that negatively impact healthcare and find a way of informing mike about these beliefs.

Spiritual beliefs can also act as the basis for convincing mike to make better decisions. For instance, if he believes in going good to others, s, the physician might tell him about the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence (Ellis, 2020). This might make him believe that medical interventions achieve the same goal as those in spirituality. At least these similarities might make him change his mind.  Spiritual assessment will also make the physician understand the approach to use in order to convince him. Spiritual expressions such as love, compassion, and hope constitute the most basic universal approach in nursing care (O’brien, 2017). Therefore, spiritual assessment is important because it enables the physicians to figure out the dimensions of their client’s lives. 

Conclusion

Patient’s autonomy allows patients to make their own decisions without outside influence. In the case study, Mike is making decisions that may further cause serious harm to James. Mike should be stopped from making such decisions so as to improve James health status. How a Christian will perceive sickness and good health depends on the beliefs that the denominations hold and their teachings. It is appropriate for Christians to view sickness as disruption of bodily functions that needs the interventions of a medical professional. Spiritual assessment is an important aspect of care, especially when such beliefs might influence the type of care provided.

References

Butts, J. B., & Rich, K. L. (2019). Nursing ethics. Burlington, Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Ellis, P. (2020). Understanding ethics for nursing students. London: Learning Matters.

O’brien, M. E. (2017). Spirituality in nursing. Burlington, Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning.