PHI-413V Case Study on Death and Dying
Grand Canyon University PHI-413V Case Study on Death and Dying – Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University PHI-413V Case Study on Death and Dying assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for PHI-413V Case Study on Death and Dying
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University PHI-413V Case Study on Death and Dying depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for PHI-413V Case Study on Death and Dying
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University PHI-413V Case Study on Death and Dying is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for PHI-413V Case Study on Death and Dying
After the introduction, move into the main part of the PHI-413V Case Study on Death and Dying assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for PHI-413V Case Study on Death and Dying
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for PHI-413V Case Study on Death and Dying
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the PHI-413V Case Study on Death and Dying assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for PHI-413V Case Study on Death and Dying
Abstract
Based on the Christian narrative for the PHI-413V Case Study on Death and Dying assignment, George should believe that all humanity disobeyed God when a man allowed the devil to entice him, leading to the original sin. Humanity became enslaved to evil, and suffering and death are the ultimate results of the original sin and the world’s subsequent fallenness. However, the Christian worldview seeks a motivational approach to ethics and Godly thinking that gives man hope and confidence for an eternal future where there will be no suffering. The Christian worldview is based on an overall structure that shapes religion, social and natural science, and humanities and art that apply to life. In this case, the study on George shows the need for Christian to link all their suffering and pain to past sins but hope that through redemption and resurrection of Christ, they will get eternal life. Those with terminal conditions like George need to hope in God and not take away their lives due to suffering.
End of Life Decisions
Health care services providers require cultural competence to help them navigate the spiritual, religious, cultural, and social needs of patients and their families. Death and dying are some of the cultural and social issues that health care providers, especially nurses, must deal with in their clinical practice. The nature of death entails deep religious and philosophical questions. Euthanasia is a controversial matter in bioethics. Christians and different cultures view death, and issues like euthanasia differently (Saybey, 2016). While the increased rate of interfaith and intercultural marriage demonstrates that individuals have learned to accommodate some cultural beliefs, death and dying remain delicate matters that require careful balancing of health care ethics and biomedical decisions and need to comply with cultural needs (Freitas & Zhang, 2019). Given these issues, the following paper analyzes George’s case study, a patient diagnosed with the degenerative amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) that leads to loss of the ability to speak, eat, move, and breathe before one dies. The paper analyzes George’s imminent death and the ethical perspective of euthanasia based on the Christian worldview.
Also Read:
PHI 413 Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis
PHI 413V Applying the Four Principles: Case Study
PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study
PHI-413V Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory
George’s Interpretation of his Suffering in Christian Narrative with Emphasis on Fallenness of the World
When people decide to get a medical intervention to health care problems they have, they may lose their beliefs based on the issues’ nature. Patients may not conform blindly to their diagnoses and treatment interventions selected by the health care providers. Some may decline the kinds of treatment interventions recommended because their faith may not advocate for such methods. In this case study, George has amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), which a degenerative condition that is slowly but surely killing him. Unfortunately, George understands the situation and the things that will happen to him before his eventual demise by succumbing to this condition. George decides to seek voluntary euthanasia, which is against the Christian worldview.
As a Christian, George needs to interpret his suffering based on man’s fallenness based on the Christian narrative. The fall of man happened in the Garden of Eden when Adam and Eve disobeyed God by eating the forbidden fruit. Before that happened, man lived without suffering, but after eating the forbidden fruit, the world’s fallenness began, and God separated Himself from the sinful man. The world’s fallenness was the starting point of human suffering. God cursed the earth and snake and pronounced suffering on man forever. Therefore, the world’s fallenness was the beginning of all nightmares, including incurable and chronic conditions like the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis that George is suffering from in this case study.
George should interpret his suffering as the culmination of the original sin where man must suffer from different things, including sicknesses and death. Human beings keep sinning and felling short of God’s will. George may justify his suffering to the sinful nature of human beings. Human beings do not like being subjected to the curse as God pronounced in the Garden of Eden. Human beings have corrupt everything God has given to them and continue to suffer His judgment and pain associated with it. Imperatively, George should console himself that every person has sinned against God and therefore, suffering, including having incurable diseases, is part of human life and experience.
George’s Interpretation of His Suffering with Emphasis on Hope of Resurrection
Christians believe that God creates everything that exists in the world. Further, God sent his Son, Jesus Christ, to redeem men from their sins on condition that they repent. Imperatively, a Christian would view whatever is happening to George as God’s will. Suffering, such as George’s, is intended to bring humanity close to God and make human beings aware that Christ suffered for their sake and redemption. Christian teaching that Jesus died alters the view and experience of death (De Villiers, 2016). Christians acknowledge that death is a tragedy and evil, but Jesus overcame death on the cross by resurrecting on the third day. Therefore, Christians advance that death is a defeated enemy, and through Christ, human beings have the hope of defeating it and rising again on the second coming of Jesus. According to the Christian narrative, God continually redeems the broken and will save human beings from death. As such, Christians and human beings should be close to God and live according to His will.
Perceiving suffering as God’s will help Christians remain steadfast in their beliefs, faith, and trust in God (Saybey, 2016). The implication is that they become more assertive in their faith. When Christians believe that suffering may be a result of past sins, they have an opportunity to go before God and repent their sins and mend their relationship. The implication is that God is an orderly being as He allows suffering to make human beings turn back to Him from their sinful ways and experience His abundant love.
While some people may consider suffering as punishment, George needs to look at it from a repentance perspective and know that he can repent his sins, seek forgiveness, and understand God’s will and plan. Suffering because of the disease may not be a punishment but an opportunity for George to hope for resurrection after death (De Villiers, 2016). God has a great love for humanity, and these reasons should help George increase his belief in God that his sins will be forgiven, and his suffering will end after death. George has the hope that he will rise again on the second coming of Jesus Christ.
Christian Worldview on Value of His Life as a Person
According to the Christian worldview, life is a precious gift from God, and no one, irrespective of their health condition, should devalue their life (Freitas & Zhang, 2019). George should view his life as precious and gift from God even amid the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The implication is that George and even those close to him should not think of taking life away. According to the Christian worldview, even with the severe disease, George should endure the pain and experiences linked to the condition. A painful encounter like the one he has should not make an individual decide to end their life (De Villiers, 2016). The Christian narrative advances that human beings should hold on to their faith even during painful moments, and suffering should be taken positive despite its destabilizing nature (Boaheng, 2020).
George needs to understand that he is still a valuable person even as he battles a disabling and devastating condition like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Life is a gift from God, and due to the entry of sin into the world, suffering is a component of each person’s life. Therefore, George needs to know that life is still valuable to God, and in Him who has a reason to allow George to experience and endure the disease. George should try to figure out what God is teaching him through his diagnosis and utilize his present condition and life to give God glory. George needs to persevere in his painful suffering and respect the gift of life and value as a person. He must uphold the Christian value of life as God’s gift that is invaluable and cannot be taken away.
Values and Considerations from a Christian Worldview on Euthanasia
The question about euthanasia is whether the practice is right or wrong. What is clear is that George has ALS, and no chances exist for him to return to his everyday life. His life may end anytime between now and anywhere in the next ten years. While this is the reality and he opts for euthanasia, the Christian worldview cannot let George go for his decision. Christians believe that human life bears the image of God, and no person, irrespective of their amount of suffering and humiliation from a condition or disease, have the right to terminate their life (Boaheng, 2020). The intrinsic value of life, autonomy, and community relatedness should be considered positively and allow human beings to lead and sustain life. Christians follow God’s ten commandments, and the Sixth Commandment is explicit that one should not kill. Therefore, committing suicide or assisting an individual to commit suicide would be going against God’s commandment.
George should not be afraid of death since Jesus Christ died on the cross and underwent severe suffering and humiliation. Jesus asked if it is God’s will to take away the cup of suffering. However, God did not because it was His plan. Therefore, George needs to understand that God allows people to suffer like Job, who lost everything, including his health, except his soul that God instructed the devil not to touch. George may suffer physical and emotional pain, but he needs to know that his soul is protected from suffering by God, just like he protected Job and Jesus Christ. Suffering allows man to develop a close and intimate relationship with God, and in this case, God wants George to get closer to Him.
According to Meilaender (2013), anticipations concerning life and death significantly determine how individuals accept the possibility of death. Suppose Christians perceive that everything, particularly suffering and death, is according to God’s will and the final hope of life through Jesus’s death and resurrection. In that case, they can be assured of God’s protection and love (Choundry et al., 2018). As such, George should consider his life and sickness as based on God’s working and will. Moreover, God has a purpose and reason for our lives, irrespective of the dilapidating conditions that one may encounter or experience, right from disease to death.
Morally Justified Option for George from the Christian Worldview
George needs to understand that Christianity does not support euthanasia and even certain cultures and religions like Buddhism and Islam. The morally justified choices or options for George from a Christian perspective are broad and encouraging. Firstly, Christianity supports the idea of offering George natural care that would allow him to lead a quality life in his last days. Christianity endorses the use of conventional medical and health care interventions and drugs (De Villiers, 2016). For instance, George can seek palliative or hospice care to allow him to manage the pain and any devastating effects of the condition that may impair his abilities from the early beginning. The use of medical intervention would help George to concentrate on his life and carry out certain activities. The moral option is to allow medications to help him manage his condition’s pain and suffering.
George should continue living and never contemplates euthanasia since Christianity does not support it. Christianity values human life, and euthanasia interferes with God’s process and purpose of living and human destiny (Boaheng, 2020). Suffering is part and parcel of ordinary Christian living, and George should accept the pain that he is enduring and will continue to face due to his condition. Christ took his suffering and pain during his crucifixion. Therefore, terminally ill individuals should accept their requirements and make moral decisions that are sound and not influenced by other worldviews.
My Decision if in George’s Condition
George’s diagnosis is threatening and complex to understand, especially its degenerative nature. However, it is emotional to watch a person wreath in pain due to an incurable medical condition with no known remedies. In this case, one can lose hope and seek quick solutions. I believe that it would be a difficult decision for anyone to make if in George’s situation. The implication is that deciding life and death is emotionally draining and requires a robust attitude. Based on the disease’s degenerative nature, I would opt for palliative care or hospice with the hope that God always intervenes and corrects situations. Miracles are bound, and it is not acceptable to condemn oneself because of a medical condition. Therefore, as a Christian, I would not opt for euthanasia or assisted suicide but go for medical interventions and hope that God will intervene.
Conclusion
The Christian worldview considers life as a precious gift from God, and He alone has the power to take it away. Suffering and pain are part of God’s plan to bring human beings close to Him. Human beings should accept suffering and hurt as part of God’s plan. George needs to get his condition and seek morally justified solutions or medical interventions instead of euthanasia. George needs to know that diseases and conditions are not permanent but can be cured through miracles and placing one’s hope in God. Besides, there is life after death through the second coming of Jesus. Therefore, nurses and other healthcare providers need to understand different worldviews to resolve any ethical and cultural dilemmas they may face in providing care to patients.
References
Boaheng, I. (2020). The Doctrine of Imago Dei and the challenge of euthanasia. E-Journal of
Religious and Theological Studies (ERATS), 6(3): 158-168.
Choundry, M., Latif, A. & Warburton, K. G. (2018). An overview of the spiritual importance of
end-of-life care among the five major faiths of the United Kingdom. Clinical Medicine, 18(1): 23-31.
De Villiers, E. D. (2016). May Christians request medically assisted suicide and euthanasia?
HTS Theological Studies, 72 (4).
Freitas, E. & Zhang, G. (2019). Exploration of Patients’ Spiritual/Religious Beliefs and
Resuscitation Decisions. Hawaii Journal of Health & Social Welfare, 78(7): 216-222. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31475249/
Meilaender, G. (2013). Bioethics: A Primer for Christians, 3rd Edition. Michigan: Eerdmans.
Saybey, B. (2016). Definitions of death: brain death and what matters in a person. Journal of
Law & Bioscience, 3(3), 743–752.
Sample Answer 2 for PHI-413V Case Study on Death and Dying
Abstract
Individuals suffering from terminal illnesses may contemplate end or life decisions that present complexities and difficulties to make. The case study on death and dying presents a chance for healthcare providers to understand the Christian worldview and how it can influence the overall decisions that one makes. George is diagnosed with a degenerative condition, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis that will eventually incapacitate him because it attacks the nervous system and the nerves in the body. George will soon lose his ability to take care of himself and may have to depend on his family to help him execute different tasks of daily living. The condition will also impact his social skills before he eventually becomes a vegetable. As such, many individuals may contemplate euthanasia to avoid the suffering and incapacitation associated with the condition. Based on the Christian worldview, this analysis focuses on the diverse aspects of decision-making that George may encounter and needs to make. The analysis asserts that George should consider a host of aspects before making the decision. This includes the biblical narrative that entails the fallenness of the world, the hope of resurrection through Jesus Christ, and values as well as considerations that George should make before he decides to opt for euthanasia. The analysis focuses on diverse aspects that would impact the decisions that George makes and the morally justified ones to ensure that he lives comfortably despite his current situation. The paper concludes that despite the terminal condition, George should not contemplate suicide but be resilient to move to the next level of his life based on the Christian narrative.
Case Study on Death and Dying
As frontline care providers, nurses should understand different worldviews and what they advance when patients face the end of life decisions due to terminal conditions like amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Religious beliefs and cultural practices impact how people feel about death and the dying experience (Benedic, 2019. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the case study on end-of-life decisions depicting George, who was recently diagnosed with ALS condition and is contemplating physician-assisted suicide. The analysis uses the Christian worldview based on the Christian biblical narrative to analyze the case and offer a personal perspective on George’s situation,
Suffering and Fallenness of the World
The Christian biblical narrative asserts that the fall of man occurred in the Garden of Eden because of disobedience as Adam disobeyed God. The disobedience caused the Original Sin that brought suffering and its culmination was death. Christians believe that the fallenness of the world is manifested by suffering, diseases, especially terminal illnesses, hunger, and violence through wars and conflicts in the world. Therefore, man must suffer in different ways through disease affliction, and death. God pronounced His wrath and punishment to man, woman, and even the animal that lied to them. The implication is that suffering is viewed negatively as a demonstration of one’s evil ways and disobedience based on the first sin. However, Christians also believe that suffering is not entirely negative but aimed at strengthening one’s faith in God and resilience in life (Benedic, 2019). Imperatively, Christians give the example of Job who suffered in the Bible, and Jesus Christ; God’s son, who suffered for the salvation of mankind.
Christians believe that suffering is not entirely bad or negative but a necessary part of life aimed at strengthening the believe and trust in God. Therefore, George should interpret his current condition; ALS, as part of the ordinary suffering that God pronounced on man because of the original sin of Adam and Eve (Hoehner, 2020). George should also interpret his suffering as part of being human and facing challenges; Jesus Christ suffered and all people at some point in life face challenges, including terminal conditions and the prospect of untimely and immature deaths. George should consider his situation as part of life; whether as original sin or not, but aimed at enhancing his trust and faith in God. It will also place him close to God as he seeks divine intervention.
Suffering and the Hope of Resurrection
The passion, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ provide Christians with the ultimate importance of death. The Christian narrative is emphatic that the redemption of the human kind happened through the death and eventual resurrection of Jesus Christ. Therefore, through resurrection, Jesus conquered death. Christians believe that on the second coming of Christ or the judgment day, all those dead will be resurrected because all human beings share in God’s kingdom (White, 2020). The concept of Imago Dei advances that God created man in his image and this implies that he shares in God’s plan of resurrection since Jesus Christ resurrected from the dead. The narrative emphasizes that Jesus’s resurrection brings hope that even those who die, will resurrect and live again on judgment day. Therefore, George should interpret his suffering as part of his passion to prepare for his eventual resurrection.
George should consider his diagnosis as God’s will (Hoehner, 2020). Jesus’s death and eventual resurrection provide the hope that even though man will die, he shall resurrect from the dead. Because of his diagnosis, George may feel that he is helpless and despaired. However, he should turn to Christianity to realize that his pain can lead to rebirth beyond death. Furthermore, death is an inevitable part of everyone’s life because humans live on a fallen planet. Just like one man brought sin to the world, one man will also deliver it, and that is Jesus Christ through his resurrection. George should interpret his suffering with the hope that it will be over if God intervenes or even if he dies, he shall resurrect and live again on the second coming of Jesus Christ.
Value of Life
The Christian worldview asserts that life begins at conception and that all people, irrespective of their disability or illnesses, have inherent dignity and respect. Christians also believe that man is born with inherent freedom and God gives him the free will to choose and live based on what he believes is right. However, life is valuable because it is a sacred gift from God and only He has the right to take it away. Despite his terminal diagnosis and condition, George should know that his life is valuable and a sacred gift from God. Consequently, he has no power to terminate it (Hoehner, 2020). Based on the concept of Imago Dei, George needs to know that his life is beyond the physical form of his body but entails the spirit of God.
As he contemplates euthanasia, George needs to understand that Christianity through the Ten Commandments does not allow killing or murder. Euthanasia or mercy killing as well as physician-assisted suicide amount to the murder or killing that Christianity outlaws. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a degenerative condition and George needs to know that even when he will be incapacitated, the value of his life will not diminish because he is created in God’s image.
Euthanasia: Values and Considerations
The Christian worldview and teachings prohibit any form of euthanasia. Christians believe that God has ultimate control over life and death and every individual is valuable as He created them in his image. Christians have a strong moral objection and rejection of euthanasia and any aspects that may lead to the loss of life (Kurtén, 2018). The critical values that George should consider in life of his condition and decisions include the sacredness of life, the love and respect that he has for his family and God as well as the kind of legacy that he shall live if he accepts not to fight on but seek an easy way to death. George should consider how his family will think and take him, especially when he is gone. Euthanasia may not offer the common good for his family as they still need him, irrespective of his condition (Vasylieva et al., 2021). George should also consider his contribution to society and the kind of encouragement that he can provide to different people, irrespective of his condition. Based on these values and considerations, George should opt or not for euthanasia as it means that he does not value all those who love him, especially his family.
Morally Justified Options
The Christian worldview advocates increased trust and belief in God through prayers and other religious activities. George should seek prayers and repentance, especially because he contemplates euthanasia. George should continue to live his life despite the misery brought about by the unfortunate diagnosis. He should accept his situation and demonstrate humility by not contemplating suicide because he is not the author of his life or his inevitable death. George needs to understand that death is part of the human experience and living. He cannot avoid it and can only seek ways to lessen his suffering.
The morally justified solution or option for George is to live his life and seek ways to reduce the pain and symptoms of the condition. While it is difficult to make decisions in such situations, George should focus on his life and seek palliative care instead of considering an easy way out of the situation. George should get palliative care to strengthen him and ensure that he gets good care to prolong his life comfortably. He needs to understand that his family still needs him.
Personal Decision
George’s situation is complex and hard for one to contemplate being in such circumstances. However, it is possible and can occur. As such, I would choose to live as long as those around me provide essential support. A disability should not cause one to despair and seek ways to die as many people are born with such conditions yet they live happily and seek ways to improve their lives. The Christian worldview shows that life is equally valuable and that no life is more equal than another. Therefore, I would seek ways to live a quality life through palliative care until the last breath that I will take.
Conclusion
The case study on “end-of-life decisions” demonstrates the need for providers to have sufficient knowledge about diverse worldviews and interpretations of health conditions and situations. The Christian narrative is emphatic that life is precious and a sacred gift from God. Therefore, Christians believe that irrespective of one’s condition, they should not take their life but believe in Jesus Christ. George’s ALS diagnosis is complex and demoralizing. However, he should not contemplate nor commit euthanasia.
References
Benedic,t F. (2019). The euthanasia debate: Importance of spiritual care in end of life.
Philosophy Study, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2019.12.001
Case Study: Grand Canyon University, (2020). Case Study: End-of-Life Decisions.
Hoehner, P. J. (2020). Death, Dying, and Grief. In Practicing dignity: An introduction to
Christian values and decision making in health care (1st Edition). Grand Canyon
University. https://lc.gcumedia.com/phi413v/practicing-dignity-an-introduction-to-
Christian-values-and-decision-making-in-health-care/v1.1/#/chapter/4
Kurtén, T. (2018). Euthanasia: Does eschatology matter? In Eschatology as Imagining the End
(pp. 61-87). Routledge.
Vasylieva, I., Hololobova, K., Nechushkina, O., Kobrzhytskyi, V., Kiriienko, S., & Laputko, A.
(2021). Attitudes of medical students towards artificial termination of pregnancy and euthanasia in the context of Christian ethics. Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe, 41(1), 8. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol41/iss1/8
White, N. H. (2020). God, humanity, and human dignity. (Ed). Practicing dignity: An
introduction to Christian values and decision making in health care.
https://lc.gcumedia.com/phi413v/practicing-dignity-an-introduction-to-christian-values-
and-decision-making-in-health-care/v1.1/#/home