PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study
Grand Canyon University PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study – Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study
After the introduction, move into the main part of the PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study
Part 1: Chart (60 points)
Based on the “Healing and Autonomy” case study, fill out all the relevant boxes below. Provide the information by means of bullet points or a well-structured paragraph in the box. Gather as much data as possible.
| Medical Indications Beneficence and Nonmaleficence | Patient Preferences Autonomy |
| Medical indications are opinions and assessments as well as facts about a patient that lead to a diagnosis. Medical indications also show the extent of severity related to a medical problem and determining the treatment choices. Beneficence requires health care providers to act in the best interest and intentions of a patient. Non-maleficence emphasizes on not harming a patient (Orr, 2015). The goals of care provision are to enhance health and wellness of patients. James’ parents acted in his best interest even though his condition was getting complex if not treated. Further, they did not have any intention to harm him and brought him back when his condition deteriorated. James requires a dialysis for now and a kidney transplant in the long-term as observed and determined by the physician who is acting based on the medical indications and following the two principles of beneficence and non-maleficence. | Autonomy is the right of a patient to make decision concerning their care and the type of treatment interventions that can help them. Autonomy allows a patient to have freedom of self-determination. Health providers obtain consent from patient before they administer any health intervention (Beever & Brightman, 2016). Further, they need to offer necessary information and details about all the available treatment options and their side effects or consequences of not having the treatment. The principle of autonomy protects the dignity of patients and enhances knowledge on the conditions affecting patients leading to adherence to therapeutic plans. Patient preferences entail the expressed choices of the patient or their substitute decision maker. In this case, James is a minor and his autonomy and preferences are exercised by his parents, Mike and Joanne. James requires treatment interventions for the kidney problem and it is only the preference of his parents, especially the decision on whether to allow Samuel, James’ twin brother, to donate the matching kidney to save his life. The physician cannot make any decision since autonomy is a principle exercised by a patient based on their preferences. In this case, James’ parents are exercising autonomy on his behalf since he is a minor. |
| Quality of Life Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy | Contextual Features Justice and Fairness |
| Quality of life entails the relevant medical features of a patient’s life before and after treatment interventions. When health providers offer treatment interventions, their aim is to enhance quality of life (Beever & Brightman, 2016). Imperatively, the follow the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence and autonomy. Therefore, to attain these three principles, health care providers should avoid potential errors while ensuring that a patient safety is a priority. They must also provide necessary information and details about a patient overall long-term condition. In this case study, James quality of life will depend on the treatment interventions that he gets, especially a long-term solution like the kidney transplant. Currently, his quality of life has disintegrated after the parents had withdrawn him from the hospital and taken him to church for healing. The decision of the parents was based on their faith and best interest of their child but led to a deterioration of his health condition necessitating the need for medical services. The parents should now follow the medical advice and make decisions in the best interest of their son as opposed to their interests based on their Christian or religious beliefs. They need to allow James to undergo a transplant if necessary for long-term better quality life. | Contextual features determine the legal, social, and familial settings that impact one’s medical interventions and decisions (Carr & Winslow, 2017). For instance, James’s parents’ faith that he can be healed through prayers affected their medical decisions and the kind of treatment interventions that he should get. They wanted to depend on their faith instead of allowing James to get treatment leading to a deterioration of his condition. Again, they are worried about the long-term health consequences of a transplant and the fact that it is only through a donation from James’s brother’s kidney that he can survive. The complex health situation is affecting their familial ties and situation. Justice and fairness emphasizes equality (Gillon, 2018). The parents are facing an ethical dilemma and conflict of interest because the ideal tissue match for James’s transplant is his twin brother, Samuel. The parents are willing to allow other people donate a kidney, including them, but not Samuel as they fear that they could lose both children. The implication is that they must be fair and just to James and try to save his life. Given their faith in God, they should allow Samuel to donate a kidney so that both can survive. |
Also Read
PHI-413V Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory
PHI-413V Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory Sample Answer
Christian Perspective of the Nature of Spirituality and Ethics
The Christian perspective on the nature of spirituality is that it is a set of beliefs, values, and way of life that reflect the teachings of the Bible. Spirituality entails our relationship to what we value and our commitment to live in a manner in line with what our love demands (Villegas, 2018). As per the Christian perspective, spirituality defines this ultimate love as God. Christian spirituality presupposes a commitment to live according to God, as mentioned by Jesus that God is the source and end of all love (Villegas, 2018). Christians perceive God as the one in whom everything else has meaning and worth.
To make spirituality the foundation of ethics and morality, it means that the person we become and the choices we make should reflect what we ultimately love. Ethics in Christianity are founded on the Ten Commandments, the Great Commandment, and the Golden Rule (Villegas, 2018). The Christian perspective on ethics is that they should also be grounded by personal character. This includes our stable identity, beliefs and attitudes, values and virtues deepest desires and ideals, loyalties and commitments, and our motivation and perspective.
Spirituality inspires and influences the commitment of religious communities to establish institutions that care for the sick (Orr, 2015). The practice of spiritual disciplines can have a positive medical impact and should be considered a significant variable in the overall well-being of the patient in health care (Orr, 2015). In patient care, spirituality is exhibited by providing holistic care to patients and treating them as human beings rather than objects. Besides, ethics are demonstrated in health care by upholding moral principles such as patient’s right to autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.
Scientism and Arguments against It
According to the article “10 Things You Should Know About Scientism,” by Moreland, Scientism is defined as a position in philosophy rather than in science. Scientism has claims that are assertions about science and not of science. Scientism is categorized as either strong or weak scientism (Moreland, 2018). Strong scientism is the perception that the only knowledge that exists about reality is the knowledge that has been properly tested in the hard sciences, particularly physics and chemistry (Moreland, 2018). According to strong scientism, all other claims such as theological, ethical, political, aesthetic, are meagre expressions of emotion and private opinions. On the other hand, weak scientism agrees that there may be modestly justified beliefs outside science (Moreland, 2018). However, the settled assertions of the hard sciences are much superior to claims outside science.
There are two main claims against Scientism. Firstly, there is a claim that scientism contributes to secularism and marginalizes Christianity and ethics (Moreland, 2018). Scientism contributes to the secularization of culture since it causes individuals to believe that no one can know anything about God, and right and wrong (Moreland, 2018). Consequently, claims in religion and ethics can be disregarded since no one can identify whether those claims are reasonable or irrational.
The second main claim is that Scientism is resulting in people abandoning Christianity. According to a survey by Barna, five of the six explanations of people quitting the church and abandoning Christianity is due to the suspicion that there is no good reason to believe in Christianity (Moreland, 2018). Besides, one of those six reasons was the fact that the church does not support the developments of modern science (Moreland, 2018). People also state that the church does not know how to relate to the developments from a biblical worldview.
Ultimate Reality
Ultimate reality is an expression that denotes to the most powerful being that is supreme and fundamental in all power. In my perspective and worldview, ultimate reality is God who is the Supreme Being and the creator of the universe and everything in it. There are several terms that I use to describe the ultimate reality, such as Yahweh, God, and Jehovah. My perspective is based on the Bible, which portrays God as the Eternal Ultimate Reality through whom all things exist. The Bible describes God as Omnipotent meaning that He is the all-powerful and God Almighty. God is also described as Omnipresent signifying that He is all present and is also omniscient meaning that God is all-knowing. Based on the Bible’s description of God, my perspective is that God is the ultimate reality, who surpasses all things and human beings. Besides, it is in God whom all things exist, and He depicts truthfulness and completeness.
The Nature of the Universe
I view the universe as the totality of existence and everything that will ever exist. In my view, the universe was created by God and everything in it. God is the creator of all things, and He created it by the word of his mouth. However, God did not create the world in a chaotic manner but with order and organization. The creation of the universe was in clarity, although God created it in an open system meaning that it was not programmed. I believe that human beings may never explore the entire universe and that God unfolds His creation daily.
Human beings have been given the mandate by God to make God’s creation and the universe a better place, and thus humans have a significant impact on the universe. Consequently, the choices human beings make about the environment are significant to God and have permanent consequences.
A Human Being
A human being is a supreme creature created by God and was given the power by God to take care of the universe. Human beings are created in the image of God and thus reflect, though indistinctly, the glory of God’s character. Based on this, humans are like God. Human beings were given the greatest power and knowledge capacity by God and given the responsibility to take care of God’s creation. I believe that a human being entails more than the physical aspect we see and comprises the body, mind, and soul. The human mind enables us to come up with creative ideas and invent things that ease our lives. The soul entails the internal being responsible for emotions, and it is what defines us.
Knowledge
I define knowledge as human knowing which we acquire from reading and God’s grace. As a human being, I have the capacity to know both God and the world around me. A human can acquire knowledge about God by reading the Bible and through God’s divine grace. We gain knowledge about the universe from the Holy Scripture as well as through reading literature and research. Nonetheless, humans should ascertain that the information they obtain is from a reliable source. I believe that God continues to reveal the universe to us, and we also increase our human knowing day by day. Because God is all-knowing and we are His creatures, human beings have been given the capacity by God to know the world and God. Human beings are God’s most supreme creatures and have the highest level of knowledge.
Basis of Ethics
My basis of ethics is that they are founded on God’s character. In regards to this, ethics should uphold absolute truth and absolute morality. Ethics, guided by God’s character, provide a clear and definite right and wrong because they are by God’s holy character. I believe that there should be an absolute standard by which all moral judgments are evaluated, and this should be in line with God’s character portrayed in the Bible as well as God’s commandments.
Purpose of My Existence
I believe that every human being comes to this world for a reason. There is a short period between when one is born and when one dies. In this period, I should try to identify my purpose in this world and strive to achieve it. In my worldview, I exist to make an impact on the universe by serving people to improve their lives and make the world a better place for future generations. By identifying our purpose in this world, we attain self-actualization, and we get a desire to be the best we can be.
References
Moreland, J. P. (2018). 10 things you should know about scientism. Crossway. https://www.crossway.org/articles/10-things-you-should-know-about-scientism/
Orr, R. D. (2015). Incorporating spirituality into patient care. AMA Journal of Ethics, 17(5), 409-415.
Villegas, D. L. (2018). Spirituality and belief: Implications for the study and practice of Christian spirituality. HTS Theological Studies, 74(3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v74i3.5037