PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study
Grand Canyon University PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study – Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Need a high-quality paper urgently?
We can deliver within hours.
How to Write the Body for PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study
After the introduction, move into the main part of the PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study
Part 1: Chart (60 points)
Based on the “Healing and Autonomy” case study, fill out all the relevant boxes below. Provide the information by means of bullet points or a well-structured paragraph in the box. Gather as much data as possible.
| Medical Indications Beneficence and Nonmaleficence | Patient Preferences Autonomy |
| Medical indications are opinions and assessments as well as facts about a patient that lead to a diagnosis. Medical indications also show the extent of severity related to a medical problem and determining the treatment choices. Beneficence requires health care providers to act in the best interest and intentions of a patient. Non-maleficence emphasizes on not harming a patient (Orr, 2015). The goals of care provision are to enhance health and wellness of patients. James’ parents acted in his best interest even though his condition was getting complex if not treated. Further, they did not have any intention to harm him and brought him back when his condition deteriorated. James requires a dialysis for now and a kidney transplant in the long-term as observed and determined by the physician who is acting based on the medical indications and following the two principles of beneficence and non-maleficence. | Autonomy is the right of a patient to make decision concerning their care and the type of treatment interventions that can help them. Autonomy allows a patient to have freedom of self-determination. Health providers obtain consent from patient before they administer any health intervention (Beever & Brightman, 2016). Further, they need to offer necessary information and details about all the available treatment options and their side effects or consequences of not having the treatment. The principle of autonomy protects the dignity of patients and enhances knowledge on the conditions affecting patients leading to adherence to therapeutic plans. Patient preferences entail the expressed choices of the patient or their substitute decision maker. In this case, James is a minor and his autonomy and preferences are exercised by his parents, Mike and Joanne. James requires treatment interventions for the kidney problem and it is only the preference of his parents, especially the decision on whether to allow Samuel, James’ twin brother, to donate the matching kidney to save his life. The physician cannot make any decision since autonomy is a principle exercised by a patient based on their preferences. In this case, James’ parents are exercising autonomy on his behalf since he is a minor. |
| Quality of Life Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy | Contextual Features Justice and Fairness |
| Quality of life entails the relevant medical features of a patient’s life before and after treatment interventions. When health providers offer treatment interventions, their aim is to enhance quality of life (Beever & Brightman, 2016). Imperatively, the follow the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence and autonomy. Therefore, to attain these three principles, health care providers should avoid potential errors while ensuring that a patient safety is a priority. They must also provide necessary information and details about a patient overall long-term condition. In this case study, James quality of life will depend on the treatment interventions that he gets, especially a long-term solution like the kidney transplant. Currently, his quality of life has disintegrated after the parents had withdrawn him from the hospital and taken him to church for healing. The decision of the parents was based on their faith and best interest of their child but led to a deterioration of his health condition necessitating the need for medical services. The parents should now follow the medical advice and make decisions in the best interest of their son as opposed to their interests based on their Christian or religious beliefs. They need to allow James to undergo a transplant if necessary for long-term better quality life. | Contextual features determine the legal, social, and familial settings that impact one’s medical interventions and decisions (Carr & Winslow, 2017). For instance, James’s parents’ faith that he can be healed through prayers affected their medical decisions and the kind of treatment interventions that he should get. They wanted to depend on their faith instead of allowing James to get treatment leading to a deterioration of his condition. Again, they are worried about the long-term health consequences of a transplant and the fact that it is only through a donation from James’s brother’s kidney that he can survive. The complex health situation is affecting their familial ties and situation. Justice and fairness emphasizes equality (Gillon, 2018). The parents are facing an ethical dilemma and conflict of interest because the ideal tissue match for James’s transplant is his twin brother, Samuel. The parents are willing to allow other people donate a kidney, including them, but not Samuel as they fear that they could lose both children. The implication is that they must be fair and just to James and try to save his life. Given their faith in God, they should allow Samuel to donate a kidney so that both can survive. |
Also Read
PHI-413V Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory
Sample Answer 2 for PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study
The given case study is about Mike and Joanne. They are Samuel and James parents. James has been diagnosed with acute glomerulonephritis, kidney failure. According to James’s physician, James requires to undergo dialysis as a way of maintaining his kidney functions. However, James’s parents are of the opinion that he seeks religious healings from his pastor. The physician agrees to their decision only for James to be brought back two days later with worsening health status. He was started on dialysis and requires urgent kidney transplant. Therefore, this research paper examines the case study with a focus on the various aspects that should be considered for the health and wellbeing of James.
Should the Physician Allow Mike to Continue Making Decisions that Seem to him to be Irrational and Harmful to James?
The physician should not allow Mike to make decisions that irrational and harmful to James. Firstly, healthcare providers have the obligation of ensuring that the safety of the patient is protected. They make decisions that aim at optimizing the wellbeing, health, and recovery of the patients from their conditions (Scott, 2017). Healthcare providers also play the role of patient advocates. This implies that they fight for their patients in situations where their health and lives are at risk. An example is the case study where it is evident that Mike’s decisions are causing more harm to James than promoting his recovery.
The physician also has knowledge on issues that cause ethical dilemmas in his practice. An example of such issue is the conflict between respecting the autonomy of the caregivers and taking decisions that promote the health and wellbeing of the patient. In such situations, healthcare providers are expected to make ethical decisions that will not only protect the health of the vulnerable but also demonstrate prioritization of the health issues affecting the population. Consequently, the physician should not allow Mike to make decisions in a way that facilitates the understanding of the family. This includes explaining to the family about the prognosis of their son and possible outcomes if immediate interventions are not adopted.
The decision of not allowing Mike to make decisions concerning James’s health is not a violation of the autonomy of the patient. The physician will instead be promoting his autonomy by ensuring that the best interventions are used to promote his health. Healthcare providers often experiences ethical dilemmas in their practice. In such situations, they are expected to prioritize the needs of the patient, hence, the soundness of the decision made.
How Ought Christians Think about Sickness and Health? How should a Christian Think about Medical Intervention? What Should Mike as a Christian do? How should he Reason about Trusting God and Treating James?
There exist significant differences in the way in which Christians and physicians view or understand a disease. For healthcare providers, a disease arises from a change in the normal physiological processes in the body. However, this view might be different according to religion. For example, it can be seen from the case study that Mike and Joanne are strong believers of Christianity. They believe that everything that happens in their lives is attributed to God. According to some Christians, a disease is a symbol of God’s test of their faith or believes. They consider that a disease is something that God sent to them to know if they have strong faith in him. The best approach to an illness to such Christians is holding to a belief that the disease will heal by itself once God is through testing them. God is therefore the healer. Some Christians also perceive a disease to be God’s punishment. According to them, God sends a disease to human beings as a way of showing his dissatisfaction with their behaviors. As a result, they must live in ways that align with God’s teachings for the disease to be healed. The last group of Christians perceives physicians or healthcare providers to be sent by God to help them manage their diseases. In this case, the healthcare providers assist God in promoting the health and wellbeing of his creations. Mike’s family perceives James’s condition as God’s test of his faith in him. Therefore, the strongly believe that God will heal him once he has finished testing their faith.
It is therefore important that Christians consider medical interventions as part of the ways in which God’s efforts to promoting health and wellbeing are promoted. They should believe that medical interventions would enable them to see the doings of God through their recovery from the disease. Based on this, Mike should allow medical interventions to be utilized for the recovery and wellbeing of his son. He should have faith in God that the dialysis and kidney transplant will restore his son’s health. He should also consider the physician and other healthcare providers as part of the angels of God. Therefore, he should hold on the belief that God’s intentions will manifest through their medical interventions. Through this, Mike will be promoting beneficence and non-maleficence by ensuring that the safest care is given to his son. Furthermore, the decision will eliminate any future blames if medical interventions prove ineffective in promoting James’s recovery.
How Would Spiritual Needs Assessment Help the Physician Assist Mike Determine Interventions for James and for his Family or Others involved in his Care
Spiritual assessment is an important component in the provision of holistic care to the patients. Spiritual assessment would have benefited the effective management of James’s condition in a number of ways. Firstly, the physician could have learned about the spiritual needs of the family and their relationship with the care needed by the patient. It would have enabled him to explore the manner in which medical interventions can be used in a manner that does not conflict with the interests and expectations of the family. Spiritual assessment could have also enabled the physician to identify the teams that should be involved in making decisions on the care needed by the patient (Doreen, 2016). For example, he would have considered the need for incorporating the efforts of the family’s spiritual leader in deciding on the best treatment approach for the patient.
Spiritual needs assessment would have also enabled the physician to identify the family’s values, beliefs, and practices that are needed to ensure the adoption and sustainability of the adopted interventions. He could have also learned about the ways in which his values, beliefs, and practices are likely to influence the treatment decisions for the patient. For example, being medical personnel, he would have used biblical examples to increase the understanding of the family about the need for medical interventions (Doreen, 2016). Through it, he could have made them understand the interrelationship between medicine and religion.
Conclusion
In summary, the case study has shown the manner in which religion can influence the uptake of health interventions. It has revealed the manner in which the religious beliefs of the patients need to be incorporated into care for optimum health to be achieved. Therefore, it is important that healthcare providers incorporate spiritual assessment into their plans of care. This will enable them to provide care that promotes optimum health, wellbeing, and recovery of their patients.
References
Doreen, A. W. (2016). Spirituality in nursing practice: The basics and beyond. Springer Publishing Company.
Scott, P. A. (Ed.). (2017). Key concepts and issues in nursing ethics. Springer.