PHI 413V Topic 2 Assignment Case Study on Moral Status (Fetal Abnormality)

Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Topic 2 Assignment Case Study on Moral Status (Fetal Abnormality)– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University  PHI 413V Topic 2 Assignment Case Study on Moral Status (Fetal Abnormality)   assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for PHI 413V Topic 2 Assignment Case Study on Moral Status (Fetal Abnormality)                            

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University  PHI 413V Topic 2 Assignment Case Study on Moral Status (Fetal Abnormality) depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for PHI 413V Topic 2 Assignment Case Study on Moral Status (Fetal Abnormality)                            

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University  PHI 413V Topic 2 Assignment Case Study on Moral Status (Fetal Abnormality)   is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for PHI 413V Topic 2 Assignment Case Study on Moral Status (Fetal Abnormality)                            

After the introduction, move into the main part of the PHI 413V Topic 2 Assignment Case Study on Moral Status (Fetal Abnormality)   assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for PHI 413V Topic 2 Assignment Case Study on Moral Status (Fetal Abnormality)                            

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for PHI 413V Topic 2 Assignment Case Study on Moral Status (Fetal Abnormality)                            

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the PHI 413V Topic 2 Assignment Case Study on Moral Status (Fetal Abnormality)  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for PHI 413V Topic 2 Assignment Case Study on Moral Status (Fetal Abnormality)

Christian View of the Nature of Human Persons 

Christians perceive human as a special creature of God. In other words, the power of God is reflected on the nature of human. Human portray the attributes of God in different aspects. Influenced by Plato’s philosophical perspectives, Christians often identify the image of God in human beings only in their faculty of perception and intellectual capability and not in their physical body. According to Christianity, human have soul that connects them with their supernatural powers. Unlike other creatures, human was created in the image of God and that all their characteristics reflects the true nature of God. From the case study, terminating human life because of physical abnormality is not in line with the Christian view since life is based on the intellectual capability and faculty of perception. The real image of God as a personal being is freedom. During creation, God created human being according to His own image and likeness, He also provided them with the mark of nobility which is freedom; this constitutes the presupposition of Love. In other words, God loves everyone despite their condition.  

From the Christian perspectives, it is only through the above freedom that human beings become partner of God in all aspects of life. Also, it is only through the above freedom that God’s love be answered through free love in return. Christian perception of nature of human persons is compatible with the sentience theory of moral status. Sentience theory of moral status suggest that human beings intrinsically deserve protection. The Christian view of the human nature and its compatibility with the sentience theory of moral status directly relates to the intrinsic human dignity and value. There is the need to protection human irrespective of their physical status as they are only connected to God through soul, intellectual capability, and the faculty of perception.  

Theories Used By Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson To 

Determine the Moral Status of the Fetus 

Jessica applies blended theories as well as the modern western worldview on the moral status of the fetus. Partly, Jessica appears to have similar thoughts and perspectives to Marco which aligns with the materialism worldview. On other words, Jessica believes that disabilities portrayed by the fetus may hinder their progress socially and economically. On the other hand Jessica believes that life is sacred and that God’ power is portrayed in human life. Her thoughts aligns to the Christian worldview which suggest that human being is a special creature who directly reflect the power of God (Shelly & Miller, 2016). The above scenario means that Jessica believed in sentience theory of moral status. Marco employs the theory of materialism in worldview to determine the moral status of the fetus. In other words, Marcos has a materialistic perception on the moral status of the fetus. Marcos is more concerned with the economic status and financial difficulties that they will to face when the child is born with the abnormalities. Marco sees the possibility of having a disabled child who will create a burden and a barrier to their future life. The perception of materialism ignores religion, spirituality, and what happens to human beyond death. The theory of materialism relates events such as realities and life expectancies to the matters within the laws of nature. 

Maria believes in Christian perspectives. In other words she believes in sentience theory of moral status. She believes that life is special and that human represents the true nature of God including power and love. Maria strongly believe that abortion wrong and that Jessica should keep the pregnancy despite the possible disabilities (Gash, 2016). Maria advices Jessica to keep pregnancy and to follow the plans of God. According to Christianity, God has power over life and that His are unique and beyond the human understanding. Also, Christian believes that God is the giver of life and He has plans for everyone. As a result, Jessica should follow Gods plan and keep the pregnancy (Gaunt et al., 2016). Christina worldview often looks into God and the importance of faith, prayer, and a personal approach to healthcare processes. From the Christian perspectives, technology and science are only the gifts from God to provide benefit to the creation. Dr. Wilson believes in the theory of scientism; his personal worldview is determined science. He provides the decision to terminate fetus in line with the healthcare policies and requirements (Gash, 2016). He does not consider religion or spirituality when making decision on abortion. From the scientific tests, Dr. Wilson affirms that there is high likelihood that the fetus will develop Down syndrome upon the delivery in addition to the physical disabilities. Dr. Wilson uses scientism to determine the moral status of the fetus. 

Also Read

PHI 413 Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative: Case Analysis

PHI-413V Case Study on Death and Dying

PHI 413 Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis 

PHI 413V Applying the Four Principles: Case Study

PHI-413V Healing and Autonomy Case Study

PHI-413V Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

How the Theories Determine or Influence Each of 

Their Recommendations for Action 

Jessica and Marcos theory of materialistic worldview impacts the recommendation for abortion citing the possible social and economic problems. Dr. Wilson’s scientism theory justifies the recommendation for abortion given the fact the when the baby is born there would be a high possibility of continuous infections characterized by Down syndrome. Also, Dr.  Wilson suggests that the possible physical disabilities may hinder the life expectation of the unborn. Mari’s Christian perception justifies the spiritual perception of life; her thoughts on keeping the pregnancy is in line with the Christian view of life preservation (Gash, 2016).  

From the analysis of the situation, I tend to agree with Dr. Wilsons scientism theory. From nature, the fittest organism often survive while those with unfavorable characteristics die. From the cases study, there is low chances of survival for the fetus after birth. Terminating the pregnancy in this case is medically allowed. Dr. Wilson’s scientism theory justifies recommendation for abortion.      

References 

Gash, L. J. (2016). Would you like genes with that?: Romanticism and the debate over genetically modified food (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tasmania). 

Gaunt, T. R., Shihab, H. A., Hemani, G., Min, J. L., Woodward, G., Lyttleton, O., … & Ring, S. M. (2016). Systematic identification of genetic influences on methylation across the human life course. Genome biology, 17(1), 1-14. 

Shelly, J.A., & Miller, A.B. (2016). Called to Care: A Christian Worldview for Nursing (2^nd ed.). Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic/InterVarsity Press Case Study: Fetal Abnormality (Moral Status Essay). 

PHI-413V Case Study on Death and Dying Sample Answer

Case Study on Death and Dying 

Healthcare professionals, especially nurses, encounter difficult yet inevitable situations in life during a patient’s lifespan. One of these events is death and the dying process which despite the reality that it is inevitable, causes anguish, confusion, and deep emotional distress. The nature of death involves deep philosophical and religious views and opinions. The dying experience is scary for persons who may appear close to death and have anticipated it but this terrifies those not ready (Saybey, 2016). Aspects of death and dying like euthanasia and assisted suicide remain controversial with Christian worldview opposed to such occurrences (Meilaender, 2013). In this case study, a similar situation occurs when George, a successful attorney in his fifties is diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a degenerative condition that affects the nervous system due to its impact on the brain and spinal cord. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a terminal illness that leads to lose of all muscular functions. The diagnosis causes George to worry and begin thinking of all possibilities of getting assisted suicide. The case presents ethical issues for healthcare providers because of personal values and religious beliefs. The paper examines the Christian worldview concerning George’s interpretation of the diagnosis in different ways that include suffering, his thoughts on the condition and value of life as a person.  

George’s Interpretation of His Suffering Based on the Christian Narrative Emphasizing Hope of Resurrection 

Christians believe that suffering and the fall of the world point to the hope of resurrection. The fall of mankind happened in the Garden of Eden when Adam and Eve disobeyed God and ate from the forbidden tree. Consequently, God chased the first man from the garden and this marked the start of the fall of man. According to the Christian narrative, the fallenness of the world was the start of man’s suffering as God pronounce a curse on Eve and Adam and told them that they will always toil to get what they need (Saybey, 2016). As such, Christians interpret suffering as God’s curse for disobedience.  

George understand that his suffering is due to the terminal condition that he has and which will lead to his degenerative death. George is grieving and shows fear and dismay when he realizes that his will lose his body functions due to ALS. George will have to depend on others to execute basic and routine duties and activities that he used to do before the diagnosis. Imperatively, he will lose his dignity and autonomy as a person. George is depressed and experiencing grief. The stages of grief include denial and isolation, anger, bargaining, depression and eventual acceptance. George is experiencing bargaining and depression as he contemplates euthanasia to escape further degeneration. George looks like a fallen man whose world is coming to an abrupt end.  

George can associate his suffering with sin and consider himself a sinner as the bible is categorical that sins bring suffering. Humans keep sinning and fall short of God’s will which can be compared to George’s case. George may justify his suffering from ALS to the sinful nature of man. Human beings do not like being subjected to God’s curse yet they rejected God’s command in the Garden of Eden (Boheng, 2020).  The Christian worldview advances that suffering comes due to human beings serving God’s judgment. Imperatively, George can console himself due to his condition that every person has sinned and fallen short of God’s glory and suffering through illnesses is a form of God’s punishment.  

George’s Explanation of Suffering on the Hope of Resurrection 

Christian teachings are associated strongly with the fall if death and resurrection hope through Jesus Christ’s death on the cross. All have sinned because of the sin of the first man, Adam and Eve. The original sin is the foundation of all sins and because of it, death came in life. Therefore, illness, suffering, and death are costs of sin and due to the fall from God’s plan and glory (Saybey, 2016). Therefore, George should interpret his case as a form of suffering based on the will of God. As a Christian, he should understand that God is in control of everything, including sickness. Jesus’s death on the cross and his resurrection create hope for through Him God forgives man’s sins and provides both redemption and restoration.  

George should understand that the suffering based on his diagnosis is meant to make him stronger and bring him back to God. Through his suffering, George should know that there is hope of resurrection as Jesus Christ suffered to the point of death on the cross but triumphed over death. The Christian teaching on Christ’s death alters the views and experiences of death. Death is an evil and tragedy but Jesus conquered it on the cross. Imperatively, death is a defeated enemy and human beings, like George, have the power to defeat it through hope of resurrection (Boheng, 2020). Therefore, George should live according to Christian teachings knowing that he shall defeat death on the day of resurrection. By perceiving suffering as God’s will, Christians remain steadfast in their beliefs and faith which strengthen their relationship with God.   

George should interpret his condition as God’s test about his faith so that he can strengthen it. George should interpret his illness as not a consequence and just God’s will. George has lost hope and contemplates euthanasia as a possible solution from his suffering. Christian worldview abhors any attempts to take life away, either through euthanasia or suicide (Hesslein, 2019). Christians consider all these as forms of murder. George should repent and have a firm belief in God because He wills the suffering and has a plan for him. He should not contemplate euthanasia but have hope of resurrecting even if he dies.  

Value of Life According to Christian View 

The Christian perspective is that every person irrespective of their situations has value before God. Even those who are considered as sinful have the inherent human value and dignity before God. Christians believe that God’s love is beyond judgment as demonstrated through his son Jesus Christ. Humans are created in God’s image and this makes it possible to have value before him. Therefore, Christians believe that life is a gift from God irrespective of the illness and suffering that one may face or encounter. George should interpret his life as a gift from God and he does not have a right to end it even with the degenerative illness that he faces. Each life is sacred and precious and humans are expected to treat their bodies as God’s temples (Saybey, 2016). Because God gives out life, He is the only one to take it away. Imperatively, George needs to value his life and understand that he has no power to end it through euthanasia.  

George should accept his diagnosis and understand it and then repair his relationship with God. Every person deserves their dignity and respect and each human life matter and has value. Christians advance that individuals must have the goal of attaining eternal life in heaven with God (Hesslein, 2019). Therefore, they should allow the natural course based on God’s plan to take place. George must value his life even when it will get to a time when he shall depend on others for support due to his condition. He must keep life’s dignity as a believer in God and fight for his condition. He should not give up on hope because od has a reason for allowing him to experience amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). George need to attempt to understand what God is trying to teach him through the disease and utilize his present condition and life for His glory (Boheng, 2020). Therefore, George should continue persevering the suffering in the virtue of respecting life and Christian beliefs and teachings on the sacredness of life and God’s precious gift to humanity.  

Christian Worldview on the Values and Considerations in Regards to Euthanasia 

God loves each person irrespective of their condition and socioeconomic background. The Christian perspective is that God created each person in his image to believe in him and have faith. Christians believe that suffering is part of life and just as Jesus suffered, humans should accept it as part of their living. Christians value and consider Christ’s suffering as the ultimate way to demonstrate the immense love that God has for humanity. Jesus died on the cross and before His death, He experienced immense and embarrassing suffering. However, he remained steadfast and only asked for God’s will to transcend his wishes. Therefore, Christian values of being steadfast in faith and believing in God’s plan should inform the decision that George takes regarding his life. George’s suffering is God’s will and he should accept it instead of contemplating euthanasia (Boheng, 2020). The value of grace is sufficient and George should seek God’s grace to get the strength to endure the current situation.  

Christians also believe that God uses suffering to bring humanity closer to Him and make them repent their sins. In this case, George needs to understand that through suffering, he will be closer to God and receive sufficient grace that will enable him to deal with his current condition. By contemplating euthanasia, George is showing that he does not believe in God’s ability to cure him from the degenerating condition of ALS. He must understand that his life is still purposeful in this world.  

Christian View concerning Moral Options for George 

Different options are acceptable based on George’s condition according to the Christian view. Firstly, George should value his life and continue living until God takes his life away. Imperatively, euthanasia is not an option for him based on the Christian view. Human life is sacred and precious and a gift from God (Choundry et al., 2018). Therefore, taking human life is interfering with God’s process and is not acceptable and morally justified. Again, Christians consider suffering as part and parcel of life and God’s plan. It is morally wrong to interfere with the process and Christians should accept suffering from terminal illness as God’s plan.  

Secondly, George should reach out for pastoral teaching and spiritual help to be strong and have the ability to face his suffering. Through this option, he shall develop stronger ties with God. Being aware that you can only live for certain time is hard and devastating. However, each person should fight to live each day at a time. George has just received the bad news and should understand that he may not be alone. Probably there are other individuals with the condition and their families (Hesslein, 2019). Therefore, George should seek treatment interventions and ask for guidance on how he can get support through ALS support groups where there are individuals suffering from the disease. this would allow him to understand the condition and know that he is not alone. George would make friendship on survivorship and understand that his thoughts on death may be premature.  

Personal Perspective on George’s Condition 

George’s condition is complex and difficult for any individual, even with strong Christian foundation, to make effective decisions. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a degenerative condition that devastates and takes the hops away. It would be difficult to understand why someone should not consider taking their life. No one needs to go through this condition because it is dilapidating and severe for individuals (Fortuin et al., 2019). As a Christian, I would try to learn from my church and family at home. I would try to reach out to God and attempt to understand this condition. I would not want to go for euthanasia and would try to find support groups and medical interventions to lessen the pain. I would try to be close to my family and allow them to be a critical part of my care plan and friends so that I can create awareness about the condition which many do not know its existence and devastating effects on the body.  

Conclusion 

George’s case study demonstrates the many cases that individuals and families endure and experience due to terminal illnesses. George’s diagnosis is terrible but he needs to accept it and find God’s grace to endure its devastating effects on his body. George should value himself even in his condition and the eventuality that glares at him. However, he must understand that God’s plan remains the most important. He needs to understand that God will only him us what we can handle in our lives.  

References 

Boheng, I. (2020). The Doctrine of Imago Dei and the Challenge of Euthanasia. E-Journal of  

Religious and Theological Studies (EJRATS), 6(3): 158-168. DOI: 10.38159/erats.2020062 

Choundry, M, Latif, A. & Warburton, K. W (2018). An overview of the spiritual importance of  

end-of-life care among the five major faiths of the United Kingdom. Clinical Medicine (London), 18(1):23-31. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-1-23 

Fortuin, N. P. M., Schilderman, J. B. A. M. & Venbrux, E. (2019). Determining the end of life: a  

qualitative study of religion and euthanasia among older Dutch adults. Mortality: Promoting the interdisciplinary study of death and dying, 25(2): 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2019.1584165 

Hesslein, K. D. (2019). Free to Die: A Lutheran-Relational Approach to Medical Assistance in 

 Dying. Religions, 11(213). doi:10.3390/rel11040213 

Meilaender G. (2013). Bioethics: A Primer for Christians, 3rd Edition. Michigan: Eerdmans. 

Saybey B. (2016). Definitions of death: brain death and what matters in a person. Journal of Law  

Biosciences, 3(3), 743–752. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsw054