PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 3 Should We Without Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case

Capella University PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 3 Should We Without Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case – Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Capella University  PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 3 Should We Without Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case?  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 3 Should We Without Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case? 

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Capella University  PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 3 Should We Without Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case?   depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for  PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 3 Should We Without Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case?  

The introduction for the Capella University  PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 3 Should We Without Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case?   is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for  PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 3 Should We Without Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case? 

After the introduction, move into the main part of the  PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 3 Should We Without Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case?   assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for  PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 3 Should We Without Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case?  

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for  PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 3 Should We Without Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case?  

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the  PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 3 Should We Without Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case?  assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 3 Should We Without Life Support? The Mr. Martinez Case

End-of-life directives and issues are complex situations that providers encounter in their efforts to offer care while also maintaining ethical requirements as providers. Patient’s directives like Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) for cases that require cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) places providers in ethical dilemmas on whether to offer life support treatment or not (Dar et al., 2021). As such, patient’s and family directives, the principle of autonomy and the need to uphold ethical principles affect the provision of such care. The purpose of this paper is to explore the case of Mr. Martinez and determine the most ethical decision in providing care based on the surrounding issues.

Transferring Mr. Martinez to the ICU

The decision on if the medical team should take Mr. Martinez to the intensive care unit (ICU) and conduct cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) requires determining if the treatment will offer any benefits to the patients and the family decisions on the same.  In this case, the patient and his wife or family have made a determination that physicians should not conduct any resuscitation, including CPR. Based on the case, the treatment may not be effective, implying that it may no longer realize the aims of the pharmacological interventions. The intervention may not have significant effects on the quality of life for Mr. Martinez. A majority of states and Washington D.C. allow terminally ill patients to reject treatment when it may have limited effects on their quality of life, especially those who have less than six months to live.

Patient’s Directives

Mr. Martinez needs an ICU transfer yet his family cannot be reached and neither can he make the decision on whether or not to accept the treatment intervention. However, in his earlier decision, the patient and his family were categorical that no resuscitation including CPR should be conducted on him. Mr. Martinez was competent at this time while making the decision. As such, while the provider may feel the need to withhold life, they should uphold patient autonomy and the decisions he made with his family about any interventions, including being transferred to the ICU and conducting a CPR.

Ethical values and even the law are categorical that life is precious and should be preserved. Health care providers like physicians have the duty to preserve and protect life (Di Paolo et al., 2019). The decision to take Mr. Martinez to the ICU is a complex one as it entails considering the moral position of the physician and against the family’s and patient’s autonomy to have advanced directives, DNR. In this case, transferring the patient to the ICU and ensuring his stability is not a priority since they made it clear that such interventions should not be implemented. Withholding life support in this case is the most effective decision based on the directives from the patients and principle of autonomy since Mr. Martinez was competent when making the choice.

ALSO READ:

PHI FPX 3200 Assessment 1 Matrix of Ethical Theories

Family’s stated Preferences

In this case, the physician requires support from the family, especially Mrs. Martinez and explain the intervention as well as the chances of attaining a positive outcome. While the physician can advise the family about the benefits of CPR and transfer to ICU, it is the family has the final determination. In most cases, CPR patients rarely survive and this is what informed the family’s decision, DNR. Withholding or withdrawing life support is legally justified based on the provisions of assisted suicide and euthanasia. The principles of informed consent and autonomy are fundamental ethical and even legal considerations in this case (Vergallo, 2020). Imperatively, the ethical, moral, and legal components of the decision by the family and physician’s professional conduct are critical in this instance. The physician has no legal implications by withholding treatment for the patient based on the advance directives offered, DNR. Again, no conflict of interest arises in the case since the physician and the medical team will be adhering to ethical and legal requirements concerning the issue at hand.

Conclusion

Ethical dilemmas in healthcare implore providers to consider patient values and principles as well as legal provisions that guide such processes. In this case, the physician must adhere to the principle of autonomy and informed consent to make any decisions on giving the patient life support or not. The case demonstrates the legal and ethical as well as moral dilemmas that healthcare providers encounter in their practice environment.

References

Dar, M., Swamy, L., Gavin, D., & Theodore, A. (2021). Mechanical-ventilation supply and

options for the COVID-19 pandemic. Leveraging all available resources for a limited resource in a crisis. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 18(3), 408-416. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202004-317CME

Di Paolo, M., Gori, F., Papi, L., & Turillazzi, E. (2019). A review and analysis of new Italian law

219/2017: ‘provisions for informed consent and advance directives treatment’. BMC medical ethics, 20, 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0353-2

Vergallo, G. M. (2020). Advance healthcare directives: binding or informational value?

            Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 29(1), 98-109.

DOI: 10.1017/S0963180119000823.